Category: China

  • Biden Signs Bill To Boost U.S. Support For Tibet

    Biden Signs Bill To Boost U.S. Support For Tibet

    The Resolve Tibet Act, also takes aim at China’s lies about Tibet, calling on China to stop propagating disinformation about Tibet’s history and giving the State Department a new mandate to directly counter these false claims.

    In a message for Beijing to peacefully resolve through negotiation, not repression, an agreement on Tibet that will support Tibet’s peaceful struggle for human rights and democratic freedom, US President Joe Biden on Friday signed the Resolve Tibet Act.

    The law states that it is American policy that the Tibet issue must be resolved in accordance with international law by peaceful means, through dialogue without preconditions.

    The Promoting a Resolution to the Tibet-China Dispute Act, popularly known as Resolve Tibet Act, also takes aim at China’s lies about Tibet, calling on China to stop propagating disinformation about Tibet’s history and giving the State Department a new mandate to directly counter these false claims.

    Responding to the signing of the Act, International Campaign for Tibet President Tencho Gyatso said: “The Resolve Tibet Act cuts to the heart of China’s brutal treatment of the Tibetan people.”

    “To Tibetans, it is a statement of hope. To other countries, it is a clarion call to support Tibet’s peaceful struggle for human rights and democratic freedoms. And to Beijing, it is a declaration that American support for Tibet does not come with an expiration date; China must resume dialogue and find a solution that supports the fundamental rights of the Tibetan people.”

    One key feature of the Act is defining the Tibetan people as a people with their own distinct religious, cultural, linguistic, and historical identity. It then states that Chinese policies are systematically suppressing the ability of the Tibetan people to preserve their way of life.

    The Dalai Lama has repeatedly called for China to grant genuine autonomy to the Tibetan people, and it is clear under international law that people are entitled to self-determination.

    When House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul (R-TX) spoke before it passed Congress, he expressed his hopes that the new law will help “put the people of Tibet in charge of their own future.”

    Secretary of State Antony Blinken frequently refers to support for self-determination as a core principle of American foreign policy.

    President Biden previously pledged to push Beijing to “return to direct dialogue with the representatives of the Tibetan people to achieve meaningful autonomy, respect for human rights, and the preservation of Tibet’s environment as well as its unique cultural, linguistic and religious traditions.”

    Now that the Resolve Tibet Act is law, the onus is on the State Department and the White House to vigorously champion genuine negotiation and overcome Beijing’s stalling tactics.

    “President Biden promised his administration would stand up for the people of Tibet,” said ICT President Tencho Gyatso. “There is not a moment to lose. Experienced State Department officials like Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues Uzra Zeya now have a valuable tool to elevate their calls for negotiations and fulfill the core objective of the Special Coordinator’s office: promoting substantive dialogue, without preconditions, between China and the Dalai Lama, his representatives, or democratically elected Tibetan leaders in support of a negotiated agreement on Tibet.”

    The Resolve Tibet Act became law after three years of effort by a select group of members of Congress backed by a broad range of Tibet supporters and Tibetan Americans.

    Senior leaders of the Central Tibetan Administration and the ICT board and staff met with Congressional leaders to brief them on the situation in Tibet and discuss how new initiatives could help.

    Representatives Jim McGovern (D-MA) and Michael McCaul (R-TX) took the lead in the House, while Senators Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Todd Young (R-IN) introduced the bill in the Senate. All four leads and their staff worked tirelessly to put this law in place.

    Advocates for Tibet helped at every step along the way. These efforts included testimony from international law scholars, grassroots advocacy by Tibetan Associations, waves of petitions from ICT members, record-breaking turnout at Tibet Lobby Day, and coordination between the Office of Tibet, the International Campaign for Tibet, Students for a Free Tibet, and other prominent Tibet groups.

    “It was inspiring to witness such a positive response to the Resolve Tibet Act from across the country and around the world,” said ICT President Gyatso. “It is clear how much can be accomplished when citizens, organisations, and dedicated decision-makers unite. Moving forward, I know we can build on today’s extraordinary accomplishment.”

    “As His Holiness the Dalai Lama says, change only takes place through action,” she added.

    Rep. Jim McGovern said: “I am thrilled. The United States once again affirms our strong support for the rights of the Tibetan people under international law, including their right to self-determination.”

    “With its bipartisan passage, we hope to restart dialogue between Tibet and China to resolve the decades-long dispute over Tibet’s autonomy and governance in keeping with US policy. The Tibetans are willing; the People’s Republic of China should come to the table.”

    Rep Michael McCaul, who led a high-level US congressional delegation and visited Dharamsala last month to apprise the Dalai Lama that how the Resolve Tibet Bill had been advancing closer to becoming law, said: “This bill makes it clear the United States believes Tibet has its own unique language, religion and culture, and has a right to self-determination. The bill also requires the State Department to aggressively challenge CCP propaganda about Tibet.”

    Representative of His Holiness the Dalai Lama and the Central Tibetan Administration to North America Namgyal Choedup said: “The bipartisan and bicameral passage of the Tibet bill and the signing of the bill into law by President Biden is a huge moral boost to the Tibetan people, who continues to suffer PRC’s systematic repression. This is a clear indication of the unwavering support of the US government and its people towards the just cause of the Tibetan people. This is a call to Beijing that the only solution to Tibet China dispute is through dialogue and negotiation in good faith.”

    The 14th Dalai Lama, an icon of ahimsa (non-violence) and karuna (compassion), who turned 89 on July 6, is presently in the US recovering from a knee surgery he underwent last month.

    ALSO READ: High Hopes Dashed In Bangladesh PM’s China Visit

  • High Hopes Dashed In Bangladesh PM’s China Visit

    High Hopes Dashed In Bangladesh PM’s China Visit

    The visit did not lead to any significant progress on economic issues

    Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s recent visit to China appears to fall short on both optics and substance with no major deliverables to show, despite the claims being made.

    Notwithstanding the hype surrounding the visit from July 8-10, 2024, Chinese President Xi Jinping did not give much time to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina during her visit. It is learnt that the meeting between the two leaders lasted for barely 30 minutes, from 4:00-4:30 pm (Beijing time), which includes the time taken for interpretation.

    The fact that the Bangladesh Prime Minister did not receive noteworthy protocol treatment during the visit has also raised eyebrows. According to sources, no Minister from the Chinese government called on her during her visit; even the Chinese Foreign Minister did not visit her hotel to discuss the Bangladesh-China bilateral relationship.

    In fact, the bilateral political interaction was only between Prime Minister Hasina and Chairman of the National Committee of Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, Wang Huning. It is worth pointing out that Wang is the fourth in hierarchy in the Chinese Communist Party.

    No Significant Progress on Economic Issues

    What was to be one of the high points of the Bangladesh Prime Minister’s visit to China ended up lacking substance. The Summit on Trade, Business and Investment Opportunities between China and Bangladesh was chaired by a bureaucrat from the Government of China, pompously called the Vice Minister, but in reality, merely a Permanent Secretary.

    No significant agreement or Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) for furthering the economic ties or guiding progress was signed during the visit.

    In this context, the 21 instruments which have been signed between both sides can be broken down into exchange letters, minutes of discussion, MoUs between media agencies, renewal of MoUs and re-hashing of existing agreements.

    What’s more, the much-hyped MoU on Provision of Hydrological Information of river Brahmaputra in the flood season is a renewed MoU with no new contours, sources pointed out. 

    When it comes to the bilateral trade front, Bangladesh seems to have sought some gains on exports of value-added products such as textiles to China whereas only a Protocol of Phyto-sanitary requirements for export of fresh mangoes from Bangladesh to China was signed as a single relevant document.

    It is being pointed out that this is hardly a gain for Bangladesh as the balance of trade is in favour of China with USD 21 billion of its exports to Bangladesh against Bangladeshi exports of USD 680 million to China. Agri exports can hardly balance this trade imbalance while a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), if signed, can only be in China’s favour further. There was agreement on a feasibility study concluded for an FTA between Bangladesh and China.

    Similarly, discussions between both sides for a concessional loan of USD 5 billion seem to have faltered without a meeting ground on the terms and conditions of the loan. There is no clarity in the media yet about loans or grants. However, it is quite clear that the talks of USD 20 billion in grants and loans were just meant to create hype around the visit.

    To sum up, the hype around the visit was created by the Chinese Ambassador to Dhaka. There was too much narrative building in the media without matching real gains to be made by Bangladesh during the visit.

    ALSO READ: Bay of Bengal Ministers Meet PM Modi

  • Taiwan-US ties would only get better, says President Lai 

    Taiwan-US ties would only get better, says President Lai 

    President Lai made the remarks as he met the career diplomat during their first official meeting on Wednesday….reports Asian Lite News

    Describing US official, Raymond Greene as an “old friend of Taiwan, President Lai Ching Te said that the nation will cooperate with the US and like-minded countries to promote regional prosperity, Taiwan News reported.

    President Lai made the remarks as he met the career diplomat during their first official meeting on Wednesday.

    In his first official meeting with Director Raymond Greene of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), President Lai Ching-te expressed his belief that relations between Taiwan and the United States would only improve in future.

    The American Institute in Taiwan is a de facto embassy of the United States of America in Taiwan.

    July 9, marked the professional diplomat’s official start of office as Sandra Oudkirk concluded her three-year term.

    Given that Greene had previously spent two terms at AIT, the president referred to him as an old friend of Taiwan.

    During his visit to the Presidential Office, Greene stated that the United States would continue to assist Taiwan’s attempts to protect itself because cross-strait peace and stability were essential to the Indo-Pacific area and the rest of the globe, reported Taiwan News.

    Lai declared that Taiwan would make every effort to thwart China’s attempts to alter the status quo of the self-governed island, Taiwan News reported citing Radio Taiwan International (RTI).

    Greene recalled that Lai, a lawmaker at the time, had received an invitation to participate in the US State Department’s International Visitor Leadership Programme when he first started working at AIT twenty years earlier.

    Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China, has long been a contentious issue in China’s foreign policy, with Beijing considering the island as a renegade province that must be reunified with the mainland, if necessary by force.

    As the situation in the Taiwan Strait continues to unfold, regional stability hangs in the balance, with any escalation posing significant risks not only to Taiwan and China but also to the broader Asia-Pacific region.

    Since September 2020, China has increased its use of gray zone tactics by incrementally increasing the number of military aircraft and naval ships operating around Taiwan.

    Gray zone tactics are defined as “an effort or series of efforts beyond steady-state deterrence and assurance that attempts to achieve one’s security objectives without resort to direct and sizable use of force.”

    This comes at a time when the tensions between China and Taiwan are at an all-time high. Despite never having governed Taiwan, China’s governing Communist Party considers it part of its territory and has threatened to conquer it by force if necessary. (ANI)

    ALSO READ: Anti-China protests erupt on sidelines of NATO summit

  • Anti-China protests erupt on sidelines of NATO summit

    Anti-China protests erupt on sidelines of NATO summit

    The move by the ETGE came on the sidelines of the NATO Summit being organized in Washington from July 9 to July 11 this year….reports Asian Lite News

    The representatives of the East Turkistan Government in Exile (ETGE) have urged the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) nations to raise the issue and stand against the atrocities inflicted by the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) upon the Uyghur community of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XUAR).

    The move by the ETGE came on the sidelines of the NATO Summit being organized in Washington from July 9 to July 11 this year.

    In a post on ‘X’, Salih Hudayar, Foreign Affairs and Security Minister of ETGE said, “As the NATO Summit convenes, we urge NATO to recognize and confront Chinese imperialism. We call on NATO to stand with East Turkistan in our fight for independence and justice.”

    “NATO must take decisive actions against Chinese Expansionism and China’s ongoing Uyghur Genocide,” Hudayar added.

    Hudayar, in a video message further urged the NATO to address the pressing challenges that threaten very principles of independence, justice, and collective security.

    “For 75 years, NATO has stood as a bastion against tyranny and oppression. It has been a beacon of hope for countless people around the world who seek to live with independence and dignity, we must turn NATO’s attention to one of the most urgent threats of our time, the expansionist and imperialist ambition of the Chinese state,” he added.

    Hudayar also noted, “On December 22, 1949, the independent East Turkestan Republic was forcibly overthrown by the PRC. Since then, our homeland has been the site of systematic colonization, genocide, crimes against humanity, and unimaginable suffering.”

    The Chinese government has forcibly detained millions of Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Turkic peoples in concentration camps, and prisons subjecting them to enslavement through forced labour and seeking to erase our language, our religion, our traditions, and our very existence, he said.

    Hudayar continued, “These actions of the Chinese imperialists are not isolated incidents but are part of a broader strategy of Chinese imperialism that threatens global security and undermines the international rules-based order.”

    Additionally, the ETGE leader in his statement also said, “We see it in their aggressive territorial claims in the Southeast Asia Sea and in the Pacific, their economic coercion through their multi-trillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and their cyber espionage targeting critical infrastructure worldwide.”

    These actions are a clear and present danger to the principles of democracy, individual liberty, sovereignty, independence, and the rule of law, the very principles that NATO was founded to defend, he stressed.

    The ETGE leader called it a global fight for independence, sovereignty, democracy, and human rights. “If we allow China’s unchecked aggression to continue, the world risks undermining the very principles upon which NATO was founded,” Hudayar said. (ANI)

    ALSO READ: Bill on ‘urban Naxalism’ tabled in Maharashtra Assembly

  • ‘Pakistan in CPEC Debt Trap, China Holds the Key’

    ‘Pakistan in CPEC Debt Trap, China Holds the Key’

    Pakistan’s senior officials emphasized that simply seeking loans from international organizations is insufficient; instead, Pakistan must devise a strategy to repay the debts incurred through CPEC extensions…reports Asian Lite News

    Pakistan’s struggling economy and current monetary policies have left the nation unable to repay loans and fulfill commitments related to Independent Power Producer (IPP) projects initiated under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

    The administration has always turned a blind eye towards the matter, stated Kamran Khan the President and Editor-in-Chief for the Dunya Media Group, a prominent news organization in Pakistan.

    In a debate session with Khalid Mansoor the Former Special Assistant to the Prime Minister of Pakistan on CPEC and Shabbar Zaidi the Former Chairman, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) mentioned Pakistan is now locked in a CPEC debt trap, and only China has the key to set us free. Today, Pakistan’s IPPs under the CPEC offer a classic example of a debt trap. According to his statement during the Dunya news debate, “The creditor country extends excessive credit to a debtor country with the intention of extracting economic or political concessions when the debtor country becomes unable to meet its repayment obligations. The conditions of the loans are often not publicized. The borrowed money commonly pays for contractors and materials sourced from the creditor country.”

    China-Pakistan.

    His statement also mentioned that “Highly over-invoiced, non-competitive CPEC power projects, with a promised minimum of 17 per cent dollarized profits, have delivered the world’s most expensive electricity to Pakistani people and industries. Capacity payments and 3.5 per cent plus London Interbank Offer Rate loan terms have turned Pakistan’s debt burden into a full-fledged national security crisis. And now classic outcome of an intelligently laid debt trap: Pakistan just can’t pay the financial charges and now China has a critical say in our economic destiny.”

    He said that merely asking for a loan from international bodies is not enough, Pakistan needs to find a way by which Pakistan can pay back the debt extended by CPEC.

    In the debate, he questioned Mansoor, “Why did we not enquire that the loans that we are getting from China are on the market price and not over invoiced, and was Pakistan capable of paying the questioned loans back when they were offered?”

    Answering the same, Mansoor said “We did not make any adequate policies for China separately, as making policies is the job of the government. We were supposed to get investment to set up industries, if these industries had been set up it could have enabled us to pay back the loan. But all this did not happen”

    Taking the same issue even further, Shabbar Zaidi the Former Chairman of FBR said “Since day one I have been the person who has raised questions over the financial viability of CPEC. I have been the one person in Pakistan who has always said that the proposed Special Economic Zones cannot be developed and the strategy behind CPEC is wrong, and our country will not be able to return loans at 17 per cent return. And I always have shown my confidence the transfer pricing designed by Pakistan is wrong”.

    Zaidi also added, “Tell me a single CPEC plant that has maintained proper operations in Pakistan and we have verified the entity’s supply”. He also added that the loans and projects offered under the CPEC are not a Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) but a bond that has to be paid back to China which Pakistan in its current economic conditions cannot fulfil in any way. (ANI)

    ALSO READ: China hits back at NATO

    ALSO READ: Laos may fall victim to China’s debt trap diplomacy

  • China hits back at NATO

    China hits back at NATO

    The sternly worded final communiqué, approved by the 32 NATO members at their summit in Washington, makes clear that China is becoming a focus of the military alliance…reports Asian Lite News

    In their most serious rebuke against Beijing, NATO allies on Wednesday called China a “decisive enabler” of Russia’s war against Ukraine and expressed concerns over Beijing’s nuclear arsenal and its capabilities in space.

    The sternly worded final communiqué, approved by the 32 NATO members at their summit in Washington, makes clear that China is becoming a focus of the military alliance. The European and North American members and their partners in the Indo-Pacific increasingly see shared security concerns coming from Russia and its Asian supporters, especially China.

    Beijing insists that it does not provide military aid to Russia but has maintained strong trade ties with its northern neighbor throughout the conflict. It also accuses NATO of overreaching and inciting confrontation in the Indo-Pacific region.

    In the communiqué, NATO member countries said China has become a war enabler through its “no-limits partnership” with Russia and its large-scale support for Russia’s defense industrial base.

    “This increases the threat Russia poses to its neighbors and to Euro-Atlantic security. We call on the PRC, as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council with a particular responsibility to uphold the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, to cease all material and political support to Russia’s war effort,” read the communiqué, which referred to China by the abbreviation of its official name, the People’s Republic of China.

    “The PRC cannot enable the largest war in Europe in recent history without this negatively impacting its interests and reputation,” the document says.

    NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said China provides equipment, microelectronics and tools that are “enabling Russia to build the missiles, to build the bombs, to build the aircraft, to build the weapons they use to attack Ukraine.”

    He said it was the first time all NATO allies have stated this so clearly in an agreed document.

    The Chinese embassy in Washington on Wednesday said China is neither a creator of nor a party to the Ukraine crisis. “China does not provide weapons to the parties to the conflict and strictly controls the export of dual-use articles, which is widely applauded by the international community,” said Liu Pengyu, the embassy spokesman.

    He said China’s normal trade with Russia is “done aboveboard” and “beyond reproach.”

    Danny Russel, a former assistant secretary of state for Asia, called the new wording by NATO “an extraordinary step,” particularly because it was coupled with the warning that Beijing continues to pose “systemic challenges” to European interests and security.

    “It is a mark of how badly Beijing’s attempt to straddle Russia and Western Europe has failed and how hollow its claim of neutrality rings,” said Russel, who is vice president for international security and diplomacy at the Asia Society Policy Institute. “China’s attempts at divide-and-conquer have instead produced remarkable solidarity between key nations of the Euro-Atlantic and the Asia-Pacific regions.”

    Max Bergmann, director of the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the statement is “highly significant” because it signals to China that Europe, just like the US, also condemns support to Russia.

    “The US believes that Europe has influence in Beijing, and that while China will not pay any attention to US condemnation, they will pay attention to European condemnation because just because Europe trades with China, China also trades with Europe,” Bergmann said.

    In this year’s final declaration, NATO member countries reiterated their concerns that China poses “systemic challenges” to Euro-Atlantic security. It was first raised in 2021.

    The alliance said China has been behind sustained, malicious cyber and hybrid activities, including disinformation and expressed concerns over China’s space capabilities and activities. It also raised alarms that China is rapidly expanding and diversifying its nuclear arsenal with more warheads and a larger number of sophisticated delivery systems.

    Liu, the Chinese embassy spokesman, said China handles such issues “in a responsible manner with transparent policies.”

    “Hyping up the so-called ‘China threat’ is completely futile,” Liu said, adding Beijing firmly opposes NATO’s use of regional hotspot issues to smear China and incite a new Cold War.

    In Washington, where leaders of NATO nations are convening this week to mark the coalition’s 75th anniversary, President Joe Biden said the alliance must not fall behind Russia, which is ramping up weapon production with the help of China, North Korea and Iran.

    Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea have sent their leaders or deputies to the NATO summit in Washington this week. They are partners, not members, of the alliance.

    In the final declaration, NATO members affirmed the importance of the Indo-Pacific partners to the alliance and said they were “strengthening dialogue to tackle cross-regional challenges.”

    NATO and the Indo-Pacific partners plan to launch four projects to support Ukraine, bolster cooperation on cyber defense, counter disinformation and work on artificial intelligence. The NATO members said these projects would “enhance our ability to work together on shared security interests.”

    ALSO READ: China says India has no right to develop border region

  • CPEC Optimism Fades Amid Security Concerns

    CPEC Optimism Fades Amid Security Concerns

    President Xi Jinping emphasised that China’s commitment to Pakistan depends on the Shehbaz Sharif government’s ability to implement tangible measures to establish a “secure, stable, and predictable” security environment in the country….reports Asian Lite News

    The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has become pivotal in China-Pakistan relations in the past decade. Positioned as a focal point of President Xi Jinping’s expansive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) — a network of transcontinental connectivity projects aimed at establishing an alternative global economic framework to the Western-led order of the United States, the CPEC aims to bolster strategic cooperation between Beijing and Islamabad and open new avenues for economic collaboration between the two nations.

    However, nearly a decade later, initial optimism associated with the project seems to be fading, with China expressing dissatisfaction with Pakistan’s current state of affairs, particularly the deteriorating security situation.

    Recent months have witnessed repeated targeted attacks on Chinese nationals and interests on Pakistani soil, prompting Beijing to gradually reassess its relationship with Islamabad, despite both nations characterising themselves as ‘ironclad friends’ and ‘All-Weather Strategic Cooperative Partners’. Consequently, China has reportedly downgraded its stance towards Pakistan from “highest priority” to “priority”, reflecting Beijing’s frustration with both Pakistan’s military leadership and the civilian government.

    CPEC.

    Interestingly, President Xi Jinping has not categorically dismissed the possibility of enhancing and advancing Beijing’s economic cooperation with Islamabad. However, he emphasised that China’s commitment to Pakistan depends on the Shehbaz Sharif government’s ability to implement tangible measures to establish a “secure, stable, and predictable” security environment in the country.

    Although both nations have in principle agreed to commence the second phase of CPEC, Beijing has refrained from making any substantial new commitments to Islamabad, despite expressing intentions to align the project with Pakistan’s developmental priorities. A joint statement issued on June 8 indicates that, besides making minor adjustments to ongoing projects like the Karakoram Highway project, the Chinese government did not announce any fresh initiatives under the CPEC.

    Regarding the $6 billion Main Line-1 (ML-1) railway project, while the Pakistani government anticipated signing a framework agreement for its execution, China only agreed to proceed with it in a phased manner. This cautious stance is notable, particularly in light of concerns raised by Sinosure, the Chinese state-owned insurance firm overseeing CPEC insurance, regarding Pakistan’s financial instability exacerbated by mounting circular debt.

    The joint statement underscores that Beijing has committed to “encouraging Chinese companies to invest in Pakistan’s Special Economic Zones based on market and commercial principles”. However, this commitment is contingent upon Islamabad’s efforts to enhance its business environment and policy framework to better facilitate Chinese investment. This approach suggests China’s emphasis on business-oriented investments in Pakistan, prioritising sectors with potential for commercial returns in the second phase of CPEC.

    Specifically, Beijing has strategically prioritised sectors such as IT, agriculture, science and technology, and industry, which also invite third-party investments. The sole sector where Beijing has made an exclusive commitment is the mining of natural resources, aiming to safeguard its commercial interests and maintain a monopoly for assured economic benefits.

    Tensions in China-Pakistan relations have been simmering due to Pakistan’s struggle to curb the increasing wave of extremism and terrorism in the country, notably rising incidents of attacks on various Chinese-operated CPEC projects in the past few years. For instance, in March 2024 alone, Pakistan witnessed a series of attacks on CPEC projects in Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa provinces, leading to the deaths of five Chinese nationals.

    On March 20, Baloch rebels launched an assault on the heavily fortified Gwadar Port Authority complex, which houses several key offices, resulting in significant structural damage. Notably, Gwadar port represents the flagship project of the CPEC, and an attack on this highly secured complex sends a clear message that no Chinese project, however fortified, is immune to risk in the country.

    Subsequently, on March 25, Baloch rebels carried out another attack, this time on the Pakistan Naval Station (PNS) in Turbat. The rebel group claimed that the attack epitomised protest against the growing Chinese presence in the province and the joint Pakistan-China exploitation of Balochistan’s resources.

    For Beijing, the inability of Pakistani security forces to protect such prominent and sensitive locations, despite its stringent security measures, raises significant doubts about Islamabad’s capability to safeguard China’s interests effectively.

    China’s patience wore thin with Pakistan’s failure to prevent attacks on its interests, highlighted by a suicide bombing by terrorist group Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) on March 26. The attack targeted a convoy of Chinese engineers on the Karakoram Highway in Bisham, resulting in the deaths of five engineers and their local driver. These engineers were working on a Chinese-funded Dasu hydropower project in Bisham, located in Shangla district of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province.

    These escalating incidents prompted Beijing to publicly criticise the Pakistani government for its failure to ensure the security of Chinese nationals and projects. The Chinese Embassy in Pakistan urged the Pakistani government to “thoroughly investigate the attack and punish the perpetrators severely”.

    Similarly, a statement from China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs on March 27 called on Islamabad to promptly investigate the incident and “capture the perpetrators and bring them to justice”. This pressure compelled the Pakistani government to promptly dismiss several officials, marking a significant first, due to their negligence in securing the convoy of Chinese engineers.

    It should be noted that Beijing made Shehbaz Sharif’s visit to China conditional on Pakistan committing to launch a large-scale counter-terrorism operation akin to Zarb-e-Azb in 2014 and Raddul Fasaad in 2017. According to a local news report, Chinese government officials explicitly urged Islamabad to take decisive military action to “eliminate” all terrorist groups once and for all, citing concerns over the growing threats to Chinese nationals involved in CPEC-related and other ventures in Pakistan.

    Chinese government officials have consistently advocated for a comprehensive military operation against extremist groups. During his visit to Islamabad on June 21, Liu Jianchao, Minister of the International Liaison Department of the Communist Party of China (CPC), emphasised that “Pakistan’s internal security shortcomings pose a significant challenge that undermines investor confidence”, stating that “security threats are the primary risks to CPEC cooperation”.

    Under pressure and influenced by Chinese demands for enhanced economic cooperation, the Pakistani government announced a large-scale military operation, named Operation Azm-i-Istehkam, on June 22, just a day after public statements by Liu Jianchao. A statement from Pakistan’s Prime Minister’s Office described this as a “revitalised and intensified national counter-terrorism campaign”, aimed at “coordinating and integrating multiple efforts to decisively combat extremism and terrorism comprehensively”.

    The changing relationship dynamics between China and Pakistan underscore increasing Chinese distrust towards Pakistan, stemming from Pakistan’s persistent instability and deteriorating security scenario. While Beijing may have compelled Islamabad to declare a substantial military campaign against terrorism, prospects for improving the security scenario in Pakistan appear uncertain, given the outcomes of previous similar operations conducted by the Pak Military. Without creating a favourable security environment and addressing Beijing’s apprehensions, substantial advancement in the CPEC is likely to remain unattainable.

    ALSO READ: PM Modi Seeks Austrian Investments

  • China says India has no right to develop border region

    China says India has no right to develop border region

    India considers Arunachal Pradesh an integral part of the country, while China claims it as part of southern Tibet …reports Asian Lite News

    China’s Foreign Ministry stated that India has no right to develop the area China calls South Tibet, responding to a Reuters report about New Delhi’s plans to accelerate hydropower projects in the border region.

    “South Tibet is China’s territory,” a ministry spokesman said, declaring India’s establishment of what it calls Arunachal Pradesh on Chinese territory as “illegal and invalid.”

    On Tuesday, Reuters reported that India plans to spend $1 billion to expedite the construction of 12 hydropower stations in the northeastern Himalayan state. India’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on China’s statement.

    India considers Arunachal Pradesh an integral part of the country, while China claims it as part of southern Tibet and objects to Indian infrastructure projects there.

    Last week, Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar met with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Kazakhstan, where they agreed to intensify efforts to resolve border issues.

    The meeting between between the two leaders holds significance in light of a four-year-long frozen relations between the two countries over the standoff in Eastern Ladakh.

    India and Chinese relations hit a low except for trade ever since the Eastern Ladakh border standoff erupted on May 5, 2020. The standoff was followed by violent clashes in the Pangong Tso (lake) area near Galwan.

    Since May 2020, both India and China have held 21 rounds of Corps Commander-level talks to resolve the standoff with the 22nd meeting due to be held soon.

    Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Astana, Kazakhstan was attended by Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.

    However, Prime Minister Narendra Modi skipped the event and India was represented by EAM Jaishankar.

    ALSO READ: PM Modi Seeks Austrian Investments

  • Envoys of Quad nations hold meeting in Beijing

    Envoys of Quad nations hold meeting in Beijing

    India’s Ambassador to China, Pradeep Kumar Rawat, Japan’s Ambassador to China, Kenji Kanasugi, Australia’s Ambassador to China, Scott Dewar, and Nicholas Burns attended the meeting on Tuesday…reports Asian Lite News

    Ambassadors of Quad nations held a meeting in Beijing. US Ambassador to China, Nicholas Burns, called India, the US, Japan and Australia “close friends and partners” for the development, stability and prosperity of the Indo-Pacific.

    India’s Ambassador to China, Pradeep Kumar Rawat, Japan’s Ambassador to China, Kenji Kanasugi, Australia’s Ambassador to China, Scott Dewar, and Nicholas Burns attended the meeting on Tuesday.

    In a post on X, Nicholas Burns stated, “I had a productive meeting in Beijing with my Quad Ambassadorial colleagues from India, Japan and Australia – close friends + partners all for the development, stability, and prosperity of the Indo-Pacific.”

    Notably, the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) is a diplomatic partnership between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States committed to supporting an open, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific that is inclusive and resilient.

    Earlier on June 26, US Deputy Secretary of State, Kurt Campbell said that India and the US expressed a strong determination to hold the QUAD (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue) Summit this year.

    The senior US official was addressing an online briefing on the recently concluded India-US initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET).

    Campbell highlighted that the issue of the Quad was discussed between US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and NSA Ajit Doval during Sullivan’s recent visit to India.

    “The issue of the Quad was discussed between the two national security advisors. Both sides expressed a strong determination that, in fact, the quad will be held this year, before the end of the year. There is a strong determination on both sides to hold the quad,” Kurt Cambell said in the briefing.

    In June, US NSA Jake Sullivan and Deputy Secretary of State, Kurt Campbell were in India for the key meeting of the US-India initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET). The meeting was chaired by National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and visiting US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. (ANI)

    ALSO READ: PM Modi Seeks Austrian Investments

  • Laos may fall victim to China’s debt trap diplomacy

    Laos may fall victim to China’s debt trap diplomacy

    Laos currently has a total of USD 13.8 billion in public debt, amounting to 108 per cent of its GDP….reports Asian Lite News

    Laos, a Southeast Asian nation situated between Thailand and Vietnam, is now seeking more time to pay its debts.

    A recent report suggests that the country’s debt has nearly doubled, reaching USD 950 million in 2023, up from USD 507 million in 2022. The majority of this debt is owed to China, according to local news outlet, The Laotian Times.

    Citing a report from the Ministry of External Affairs in Laos from June this year, the same news report stated that the country had deferred a debt of USD 670 million in 2023, excluding the USD 1.22 billion that had already been deferred since 2020.

    According to The Laotian Times, Laos currently has a total of USD 13.8 billion in public debt, amounting to 108 per cent of its GDP. Notably, around USD 10.5 billion of this debt is owed to China.

    This heavy debt situation surfaced as China increased its lending to small countries that lack capability to repay. As a result, China can capture the assets of these countries for its expansionist motives.

    Meanwhile, a depreciation in the currency of Laos, the Kip, could worsen the situation for the small country. This makes Laos’s economy more vulnerable to the debt trap strategy.

    According to the Laotian Times report, the Kip of Laos dropped by 31 per cent against the US dollar last year, making repayment difficult as 59 per cent of the total debt is denominated in US dollars.

    According to another report by Nikkei Asia, the Nam Ou hydroelectric plant, one of the largest power generation facilities in the country’s north by capacity, was built by the Power Construction Corp. of China (Power China) for USD 2.8 billion and began full operation in 2021. The plant comprises seven dams.

    Additionally, the USD 6 billion China-Laos railway project, which opened in December 2021, will soon provide a direct route from Kunming, China, to the Gulf of Thailand through previously existing rail lines in other countries.

    This project currently stands as a symbol of Beijing’s ambitious regional expansion strategy. (ANI)

    ALSO READ: Hungary PM makes surprise China visit, meets Xi