Categories
-Top News Asia News Legal

Yahya Afridi appointed 30th Chief Justice of Pakistan

The parliamentary committee on Tuesday under the 26th Constitutional Amendment nominated Justice Yahya Afridi as the 30th Chief Justice of Pakistan…reports Asian Lite News

President Asif Ali Zardari has appointed Justice Yahya Afridi as the 30th Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP), according to a report by ARY News.

Notably, Justice Afridi, who has been serving as a Supreme Court Justice since 2018, is set to take oath on October 26, 2024. This appointment comes after a 12-member special parliamentary committee nominated him for the position on Tuesday.

The parliamentary committee on Tuesday under the 26th Constitutional Amendment nominated Justice Yahya Afridi as the 30th Chief Justice of Pakistan. The appointment was made under the provisions of Articles 175A(3), 177, and 179 of the Constitution

Justice Yahya Afridi’s appointment as the 30th Chief Justice of Pakistan follows the retirement of Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa. This development was made possible after President Asif Ali Zardari approved the summary, which was recommended by a special parliamentary committee and advised by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.

Justice Yahya Afridi enrolled as an advocate of the high court in 1990 and as an advocate of the Supreme Court in 2004. He served as an Assistant Advocate General for the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and as a Federal Counsel for the government of Pakistan while in practice, ARY News reported.

Justice Yahya Afridi’s journey in the legal world took a turn when he was elevated to the bench of the Peshawar High Court as an Additional Judge in 2010. He was confirmed as a permanent Judge of the Peshawar High Court on March 15, 2012.

It is interesting to note that Justice Yahya Afridi became the first judge from the Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA) to assume the office of the Chief Justice of the Peshawar High Court when he took oath on December 30, 2016. He served in that office until his promotion as a Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan on June 28, 2018, ARY News reported. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Spanish PM due in India, set to open C-295 aircraft plant in Vadodara

Categories
-Top News India News Legal

Secularism a core feature of Constitution: Supreme Court

A bench, headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, remarked that a catena of apex court judgments has held that secularism was always a part of the basic structure…reports Asian Lite News

The Supreme Court on Monday observed that secularism has been held to be a core feature of the Constitution.

A bench, headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, remarked that a catena of apex court judgments has held that secularism was always a part of the basic structure.

The bench, also comprising Justice Sanjay Kumar, which was hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the insertion of “Socialist” and “Secular” in the Preamble, declined to issue notice and posted the matter for hearing in mid-November.

Several petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the 42nd Constitution Amendment Act, 1976 by which the words “Socialist” and “Secular” were inserted in the Preamble of the Constitution.

One of the petitions said that such an amendment is against the “historical and cultural theme of the Great Republic of Bharat, the oldest civilisation of the world”.

It further contended that the concept of “Dharma” is different from the concept of religion and the Communist theory of state cannot be applied in the Indian context, which has been a total failure and is not in tune with the religious sentiments and socioeconomic conditions.

“How can the citizens of India be compelled to be secular when they have the fundamental right to Freedom of Religion under Article 25 of the Constitution of India to freely profess, practice and propagate religion,” the plea said.

The plea urged the top court to issue direction or declaration that the concepts of “Socialism” and “Secularism” occurring in the Preamble of the Constitution refer to the nature of the Republic and are limited to the working of the sovereign function of the state and the same is not applicable to the citizens, political parties, and social organisations.

The plea contended that in France and some other countries, a secular government is never involved in religious matters whereas the Indian Constitution itself has empowered the state to indulge in religious matters and some special rights have been given even to religious minorities under Article 30 of the Constitution. The petition also challenged the insertion of the words ‘Secular’ and ‘Socialist’ in the Representation of the People Act, 1951, making it compulsory for the political parties applying for registration before the Election Commission to make a specific provision in its memorandum that the association will have true faith and allegiance to the Constitution and “to the principles of ‘Socialism’ and ‘Secularism’ and democracy and would uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India”.

ALSO READ: Pak-based TRF takes responsibility for J&K terror attack

Categories
India News Legal Politics

Supreme Court embraces new symbolism

The removal of the blindfold from ‘Lady Justice’ is more than a visual change—it symbolises a shift in how the judiciary views justice in modern India….reports Asian Lite News

The Supreme Court (SC) of India has unveiled a redesigned version of the ‘Lady Justice’ statue, marking a significant departure from its colonial past. Traditionally depicted with a blindfold and a sword, the new statue now features ‘Lady Justice’ with open eyes and the Constitution of India in place of the sword, reflecting the judiciary’s commitment to constitutional values and justice that “sees everyone equally”, reported NDTV.

The removal of the blindfold from ‘Lady Justice’ is more than a visual change—it symbolises a shift in how the judiciary views justice in modern India. The blindfold, long associated with impartiality and equality before the law, has been replaced with open eyes, a bold statement led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud.

“The law is not blind; it sees everyone equally,” CJI Chandrachud said during the unveiling.

This change, according to sources in the Supreme Court, reflects an evolving legal identity—one that distances itself from colonial symbols and embraces a uniquely Indian interpretation of justice. The updated statue now stands proudly in the judges’ library, embodying a justice system that is aware, vigilant, and inclusive.

Another striking feature of the new ‘Lady Justice’ is the replacement of the sword with the Constitution. While the sword previously represented authority and punishment, its replacement with the Constitution signifies a shift towards a more principled and balanced approach to justice. The Constitution, as the foundation of the judiciary’s role, represents the upholding of rights, equality, and fairness over mere retribution.

Supreme Court.

A senior official from the Chief Justice’s office explained, “The sword is a symbol of violence, but courts deliver justice according to constitutional laws. The new statue aims to reflect this principle.”

The redesign of ‘Lady Justice’ aligns with a broader effort by the Indian judiciary to shed its colonial past. Recent legal reforms, such as the introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC), underscore this movement. CJI Chandrachud has been vocal about the need to break away from British-era symbols and laws, emphasising that the judiciary’s role is not punitive but protective of constitutional rights.

As noted by a source close to the Chief Justice, “Justice Chandrachud believes that India should move forward from the British legacy, and that the law is never blind; it sees everyone equally.” This philosophy is embodied in the redesigned ‘Lady Justice,’ which now represents the Constitution as the ultimate source of justice.

Despite the changes, one aspect of ‘Lady Justice’ remains unchanged—the scales in her right hand, which continue to represent the balance of justice. These scales symbolise the impartial weighing of evidence, ensuring that both sides are considered equally before a verdict is reached.

“The scales of justice represent balance in society, and the idea that facts and arguments by both sides are weighed by courts before arriving at a conclusion,” said an official.

CJI proposes Justice Khanna’s name as his successor

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Chandrachud has formally proposed Justice Sanjiv Khanna, the second-most senior judge of the Supreme Court, as his successor.

In a communication to the Union government, Chief Justice Chandrachud stated that since he is demitting office on November 10, Justice Khanna would be his successor.

Upon approval by the government, Justice Khanna will become the 51st Chief Justice of India. He is set to serve a tenure of six months, concluding on May 13, 2025, before his retirement.

The letter is written as per convention where the retiring Chief Justice of India nominates the second-most senior judge a successor. The Union government then approves the recommendation.

Justice Chandrachud took over as the CJI on November 9, 2022. Judges of the Supreme Court retire by the age of 65.

Born on May 14, 1960, Justice Khanna enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Delhi in 1983 and initially practised at the district courts at the Tis Hazari complex, and later in the High Court of Delhi and tribunals.

He was elevated as an additional Judge of the Delhi High Court in 2005 and was made a permanent judge in 2006.

Justice Khanna was elevated as a Judge of the Supreme Court on January 18, 2019.

Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, born November 11, 1959, is an Indian jurist, who is the 50th and current chief justice of India serving since November 2022.

He was appointed a Judge of the Supreme Court of India in May 2016 and also previously served as the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court from 2013 to 2016 and as a judge of the Bombay High Court from 2000 to 2013.

CJI Chandrachud was educated at Delhi University and Harvard University and has practised as a lawyer for Sullivan& Cromwell and in the Bombay High Court.

He has been part of benches that delivered landmark judgments such as the electoral bond scheme verdict, the Ram Janmabhoomi verdict, the Sabarimala case, the same-sex marriage case and on revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. (ANI)

ALSO READ: SC to hear plea for restoration of J&K’s statehood

Categories
Defence India News Legal

CRPF to replace NSG security of ‘high risk’ VIPs

Among the VIPs affected are high-profile figures such as Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, and former deputy prime minister L K Advani…reports Asian Lite News

The Union government has ordered the complete withdrawal of National Security Guard (NSG) commandos from VIP security duties, transferring protection of nine “high-risk” VIPs to the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) by next month, according to official sources. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has also sanctioned a fresh CRPF battalion, previously assigned to Parliament security, to join its VIP security wing.

Among the VIPs affected are high-profile figures such as Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, and former deputy prime minister L K Advani. The CRPF will assume their security under the Z-plus category protection. Other leaders impacted by this transition include Mayawati, Sarbananda Sonowal, Raman Singh, Ghulam Nabi Azad, Farooq Abdullah, and Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu.

This shift is expected to be completed within a month, as the CRPF, which already has six battalions dedicated to VIP security, will absorb a seventh battalion. This new battalion used to guard Parliament before the security of the complex was handed over to the CISF after a breach last year.

Notably, two of the VIPs—Rajnath Singh and Yogi Adityanath—will also benefit from the CRPF’s advanced security liaison (ASL) protocol, which involves advance reconnaissance of locations they plan to visit.

The withdrawal of NSG from VIP security duties is part of a long-term plan to refocus the elite force on counter-terrorism. The decision follows recommendations dating back to 2012 and builds on moves in recent years, including the 2020 removal of NSG from the Gandhi family’s security detail. The restructuring will allow the NSG to deploy ‘strike teams’ in high-risk areas, such as the Ram temple in Ayodhya and critical southern assets. This marks the end of a two-decade-long chapter of NSG involvement in VIP protection.

ALSO READ: Omar Abdullah takes oath as J&K CM

Categories
India News Legal Politics

Congress says MVA confident of victory

In a stinging attack on the MahaYuti, Chennithala said that the unconstitutional ruling coalition has indulged in massive corruption and emptied the state coffers in the past two-and-half years in power…reports Asian Lite News

The opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi-INDIA bloc allies asserted that they are ready for the Maharashtra Assembly elections scheduled on November 20 and exuded confidence in ousting the ruling MahaYuti regime to capture power. 

Leaders of the MVA-INDIA allies Congress-Nationalist Congress Party (SP)-Shiv Sena (UBT) said that they have finalised their seat-sharing arrangements, campaign material and other weapons in their political ordnance to clobber the alliance of Shiv Sena-Bharatiya Janata Party-Nationalist Congress Party.

Moreover, several leaders including AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala, state president Nana Patole, Leader of Opposition (Assembly) Vijay Wadettiwar, SS (UBT)’s Leader of Opposition (Council) Ambadas Danve, Sanjay Raut, Sushma Andhare, NCP (SP)’s Working President Supriya Sule, state chief Jayant Patil and Anil Deshmukh, and others have said that “the people will not be swayed by the pre-poll gimmicks” of the MahaYuti government.

In a stinging attack on the MahaYuti, Chennithala said that the unconstitutional ruling coalition has indulged in massive corruption and emptied the state coffers in the past two-and-half years in power.

“Though there was no provision for funds, the state government has been making misleading announcements to fool the masses. We are confident that the people will not fall for their pre-election gimmicks and will vote for a change and the development of Maharashtra,” declared Chennithala.

Patole said that barely hours before the polls were announced the MahaYuti government scrapped tolls for light motor vehicles at five Mumbai entry points, indicating the desperation of the ruling alliance leaders.

“Why only Mumbai… Why not waive off tolls for all over Maharashtra? Are the people of the city and the state different… The MahaYuti and BJP have been looting the state since 2014 and resorting to mere sloganeering,” said Patole.

SS (UBT)’s Leader of Opposition (Council) Ambadas Danve said that the MVA is fully geared up for the polls and will give a massive push to remove the corrupt MahaYuti regime where law and order have completely collapsed.

Patil slammed the manner in which the MahaYuti has emptied the state treasury and the ECI finally announced the election schedule that was delayed.

“We shall contest all the 288 Assembly seats unitedly and expose the ruling alliance, their fake promises and assurances… We shall increase and streamline the money being given under the ‘Ladki Bahin’ scheme,” said Patil.

Andhare said that the MVA has never opposed the ‘Ladki Bahin’ scheme, warned the MahaYuti leaders for taking personal credit for the dole which is actually the tax-payers money, and raised objections at the hasty manner in which 7 MLCs nominated by the Governor’s quota in the Upper House were sworn-in today morning.

Patole and Wadettiwar assured that there is no dispute over ‘Big Brother or Small Brother’ with the sole goal of ‘saving Maharashtra’ from economic peril and insecurity owing to lawlessness, atrocities on women, blatant killings, etc.

They added that the people of the state will give a befitting reply to those who allegedly carried out corruption in making the statue of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj which crashed down in barely eight months.

“When the MVA government had given the list of 12 nominees for the Governor quota MLCs, the former Governor (Bhagat Singh Koshyari) did not clear it, then the matter went to the court whose outcome is awaited, yet the MahaYuti went ahead and appointed 7 MLCs today,” said Patole, vowing to file an appeal.

Raut urged the ECI not to make Maharashtra elections go the Haryana style where many objections/doubts were raised on various counts.

“If the ECI claims it is independent – we don’t say so – then it should watch out for all kinds of machinations, the money power, muscle power, misuse of official apparatus, etc, which is rampant in Maharashtra,” urged Raut.

All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen state President Syed Imtyaz Jaleel rued that for a huge state like Maharashtra, it was expected that the ECI would hold a two-phased election, but “they paid heed to the demands of the ruling alliance.”

ALSO READ: New Low In India, Canada Ties

Categories
India News Legal Politics

Opposition MPs boycott JPC meet on Waqf Bill

The MPs expressed dismay over Manippady’s remarks, alleging that his comments were “politically motivated” and violated the mandate of the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up to examine the Waqf Bill….reports Asian Lite News

Opposition MPs, who were part of Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) meeting held on Monday on Waqf Bill, walked out over allegations made by Anwar Manippady, former Chairman of the Karnataka State Minorities Commission and the Karnataka Minorities Development Corporation.

According to the MPs, Manippady deviated from the agenda of the meeting and made a series of allegations against the Karnataka Government and levelled allegations against Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge. The opposition MPs said that the allegations were irrelevant and unacceptable.

The MPs expressed dismay over Manippady’s remarks, alleging that his comments were “politically motivated” and violated the mandate of the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up to examine the Waqf Bill.

“We have boycotted because the committee is not functioning with the principles and norms of the committee. Ethically and principally they are wrong. This meeting is not a platform for settling political scores,” said Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Arvind Sawant.

“Anwar Manippady’s focus should have been on Waqf Bill, but instead, he used this forum to level baseless accusations against our party leadership and Karnataka government. We can’t accept this type of act in JPC meetings,” said an MP from the Congress, who wished to remain anonymous.

Sources said Manippady, who has served vice president and spokesperson of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Karnataka, made “serious allegations about the mismanagement” of Waqf properties during the Congress regime.

He claimed that a vast land scam was unfolding under the guise of Waqf land administration, pointing fingers at both government officials and politicians.

Manippady presented what he described as evidence of “looting” Waqf properties in Karnataka, alleging that much of the revenue generated “was being siphoned off by corrupt officials”.

“Waqf institutions lease out these properties at nominal rates and a large portion of the proceeds–nearly 80 per cent–is pocketed by individuals ranging from Mutawallis (custodians) to Waqf Board officers and political leaders,” he claimed.

Sources said he provided examples of prime lands, leased for paltry sums, that were being used for commercial projects such as five-star hotels, colleges, and medical institutions, all of which he alleged were generating crores of rupees while Waqf institutions received only a fraction of the income.

“These leases and sales are illegal,” he said referring to a court judgment.

Manippady, in his presentation, named several high-profile Congress leaders and alleged their involvement in the misuse of Waqf properties.

Manippady claimed that that even after years of investigations and reports, the offences related to Waqf properties continue unabated, referring to the findings of his earlier “Anwar Manippady Scam Report,” which he had submitted to the Karnataka government more than a decade ago.

He emphasized that the land heist involved not only politicians but also officials from the Waqf Board.

However, opposition MPs dismissed these allegations as politically motivated and argued that Manippady’s position as a former BJP office-bearer raised questions on the credibility of his remarks and it is an attempt to malign the Congress.

As per sources, Opposition MPs will also approach to the Lok Sabha Speaker to discuss the working style of the Committee which is headed by BJP MP Jagdambika Pal.

Manippady also urged the Muslim minority community not to resist the proposed amendments to the Waqf Act, arguing that reforms were necessary to prevent “further fraud” and ensure that Waqf assets genuinely benefit the community.

He stressed the need for a transparent process that “would stop Waqf properties from being unlawfully added to the Waqf Board’s list or misappropriated by insiders”.

The walk out by opposition MPs has also led to some speculation about their participation in future meetings. They have said a balanced and focused discussion on the bill can only take place in the “absence of politically motivated distractions”. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Omar to take oath as J&K CM on Oct 16

Categories
-Top News Legal UK News

UK Govt to outline overhaul of workers’ rights

The implementation of the new body would take time – and be subject to consultation – with the earliest timeframe for the new rights to take effect being autumn 2026…reports Asian Lite News

Rogue employers will be targeted by a beefed-up new enforcement agency to protect sweeping changes to rights at work for millions of Britons, set to be outlined in a “watershed” bill published on Friday.

The Fair Work Agency will be created as part of the government’s employment rights legislation, which will include stronger protections against unfair dismissal and exploitative contracts.

Officers will have inspection powers and will be able to enforce new penalties for those who breach employee rights – such as holiday pay and a minimum wage. Whistleblowers will be encouraged to report bad behaviour to the new body.

Its powers will not be limited to the new rights but it will also enforce a range of current rights including the national minimum wage and certain aspects of the Modern Slavery Act.

The deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, said that the bill was a “watershed moment”, describing it as “the biggest overhaul of workers rights in generations”.

“This is a government by working people, for working people, and our purpose is crystal clear – to make work pay,” Rayner said.

The implementation of the new body would take time – and be subject to consultation – with the earliest timeframe for the new rights to take effect being autumn 2026.

The new employment rights bill was promised within 100 days but it has been the subject of tortured wrangling between ministers, trade unions and businesses up to the final hours before publication. A last-minute concession was made on a longer statutory probation to business leaders.

The government will now aim to make that nine months, having previously suggested that it would recommend six months. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, had been thought to favour an even longer 12-month maximum probation period.

But despite the last-minute nature of the deal, trade unions have widely heralded the changes, which the TUC called a “seismic shift”. Small businesses however have said the reforms have been rushed and chaotic in order to meet an arbitrary timeframe.

The government claims the scope of the reform is huge – 9 million people will gain new rights against unfair dismissal, more than 1 million low-paid workers on zero hours will have the right to job security on a new contract, an extra 30,000 parents will gain new rights to paternity leave, and 1.5 million will be newly entitled to unpaid parental leave.

Ministers also believe the bill will help at least 1.7 million people into the labour market who are not working because of family commitments – and who would benefit from new policies on flexible working and parental leave.

“This landmark legislation will turn the tide on decades of insecurity and low-pay while driving up productivity, generating growth and improving living standards,” Rayner said.

“In the biggest overhaul of workers rights in generations, today Labour will put fair pay and secure work back at the heart of our economy, boosting productivity and growth.”

The bill will remove the two-year qualifying period that employees must currently serve before they can sue for unfair dismissal – and that right will now be available from day one. But in a concession to businesses, there will also, for the first time, be a probation period defined in law, which will allow for a “lighter touch” route to letting an employee go for poor performance.

Government sources have stressed that action for unfair dismissal will still be possible during this period if an employer has acted incorrectly.

Within the bill are 28 major reforms, including the end of zero-hours contracts, apart from at a specific employee request, and a ban on fire and rehire practices, though with some exemptions if a business is at real risk of permanent collapse.

There will be new rights to sick pay from day one of illness and the removal of the lower earnings limit for sick pay. Employees will get day one rights to paternity and unpaid parental leave.

The legislation will require employers to adopt flexible working as the default for employees – though employers will be able to object on specific practicality grounds. It will also require large employers to create action plans on addressing gender pay gaps and supporting employees through menopause. Protections against dismissal will be strengthened for pregnant women and those returning from maternity leave.

The bill will also repeal the anti-union legislation put in place by the previous government, including the Minimum Service Levels (Strikes) Act legislation, which never came into force.

However, a number of measures in Labour’s manifesto and original workers’ rights pledges have not made the cut – most crucially a pledge to legislate on a single status of workers to erase the grey area between employee and self-employment status.

Government sources said that required a longer period of consultation and could not be done within the 100 days timeframe – but insisted it remained a commitment.

Other commitments have been watered down and are likely to take the form of a code of practice, including the “right to switch off”, which would prevent employees being contacted out of hours except in emergencies. There will also be a promised review of the parental leave system.

Unions have broadly welcomed the vast majority of the changes – despite some anger over the summer on the carve-outs for fire and rehire and zero-hours contracts, as well as the slow implementation. The general secretary of the TUC, Paul Nowak, said it was “time to write a positive new chapter for working people in this country”.

Christina McAnea, head of the largest trade union, Unison, said: “Shifting the balance to give workers greater rights is long overdue. Expectations are high for this bill, which should bring once-in-a-generation changes to the workplace. For too long employees have had to suffer poverty wages, intolerable working conditions and discrimination.”

Ministers have been at pains to stress that the new laws will involve lengthy consultation with businesses – who have sounded the alarm for several years about the risks of the proposals on growth and the jobs market.

Tina McKenzie, policy chair at the Federation of Small Businesses, said: “This legislation is a rushed job, clumsy, chaotic and poorly planned – dropping 28 new measures on to small business employers all at once leaves them scrambling to make sense of it all. Beyond warm words, it lacks any real pro-growth element and will increase economic inactivity.”

The business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, who will introduce the bill, said it would be good for businesses and workers. “The best employers know that employees are more productive when they are happy at work. That is why it’s vital to give employers the flexibility they need to grow whilst ending unscrupulous and unfair practices,” he said.

ALSO READ: Investment Summit strikes change of tone

Categories
-Top News Legal USA

US SC to hear ‘ghost guns’ regulation case

While guns are at the center of the case, Garland v. VanDerStok, the legal issues are about the power of federal agencies rather than Second Amendment rights…reports Asian Lite News

The Supreme Court seemed likely Tuesday to uphold a Biden administration regulation on ghost guns, the difficult-to-trace weapons found in increasing numbers at crime scenes.

In arguments that ranged from classic cars to Western omelets, key conservative justices seemed open to the government’s argument that kits allowing people to make nearly untraceable guns at home can be regulated like other firearms.

Two conservative justices, Chief John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, previously joined with the three liberals to allow the rule to go into effect and seemed skeptical of the arguments that the Biden administration overstepped by trying to regulate gun parts rather than finished weapons.

Many of the justices’ questions focused on whether the kits were close enough to functioning weapons to be regulated as guns.

Justice Samuel Alito compared the components to food, suggesting eggs, peppers and ham aren’t necessarily a Western omelet so shouldn’t be treated like one.

Barrett, though, proposed gun kits are more like meal kits ordered online that contain everything needed to make a specific dinner, like turkey chili.

Roberts, for his part, seemed skeptical of the challengers’ position that the kits are mostly popular with hobbyists who enjoy making their own weapons, like auto enthusiasts might rebuild a car on the weekend.

Many ghost gun kits require only the drilling of a few holes and removal of plastic tabs.

“My understanding is that it’s not terribly difficult for someone to do this,” he said. “Drilling a hole or two, I would think, doesn’t give the same sort of reward that you get from working on your car on the weekend.”

A ruling is expected in the coming months.

While guns are at the center of the case, Garland v. VanDerStok, the legal issues are about the power of federal agencies rather than Second Amendment rights. The case comes after the high court struck down another firearm regulation, a Trump-era ban on gun accessories known as bump stocks that enable rapid fire. In that case, the court found that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives wrongly categorized the accessories as machine guns.

The ghost gun regulation came after their numbers around the country soared, going from fewer than 4,000 recovered by law enforcement in 2018 to nearly 20,000 in 2021, according to Justice Department data. The number of ghost guns has since flattened out or declined in several major cities, including New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Baltimore, according to court documents.

Finalized at the direction of President Joe Biden, the rule requires companies to treat the kits like other firearms by adding serial numbers, running background checks and verifying that buyers are 21 or older.

ALSO READ: Harris holds slight edge over Trump

Categories
-Top News Legal UK News

ASA cracks down on misleading broadband price ads

The guidance sets stricter rules on the prominence that must be given to important information about future price rises when customers sign up…reports Asian Lite News

The UK advertising watchdog has cracked down on marketing campaigns by telecoms companies including BT, EE, Virgin Media and O2 for misleading consumers about price rises added to their bills during their contracts.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has issued a batch of rulings against ads run by BT, its subsidiaries EE and Plusnet, as well as TalkTalk, O2 and Virgin Media broadband.

In each case, ad campaigns run by the telecoms companies have fallen foul of new guidance added to the UK advertising code, implemented in December to help curb “greedflation” in the sector.

The guidance sets stricter rules on the prominence that must be given to important information about future price rises when customers sign up.

The ASA ruled that the ads must not appear again and told all six providers to ensure they make sufficiently clear that broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases, and that information about the nature of such rises is presented prominently.

The ad watchdog launched the crackdown after the media regulator, Ofcom, moved in January to ban the widespread practice of broadband and mobile operators implementing mid-contract price rises linked to inflation to consumers’ bills without them being aware.

Research by the consumer group Which? estimates that telecoms firms will generate £488m from mid-contract price rises in 2024.

Telecoms companies have moved to stop the practice, which is not allowed in other utility sectors such as electricity and gas. However, the UK ad watchdog has found that they are still not being clear and upfront about real “pounds and pence” changes to bills.

“All of the companies have fallen foul of guidance that sets stricter standards on the prominence advertisers must give to important information about future price rises,” said the ASA.

“Marketers are required to ensure that advertising for services that include mid-contract price increases … is presented clearly and prominently. The guidance also states that asterisks or links, which linked to information more than one ‘step’ below the price claim, were unlikely to give adequate weight to the significance of material information. We concluded that the ads are likely to mislead.”

Most mobile and broadband companies added mid-contract price increase clauses in 2021, at a time when inflation was running at only 1.5%.

However, the surge in inflation to a 41-year high in October 2022 caused a significant impact on household finances amid the cost of living crisis, prompting the media regulator and ad watchdog to crack down on the practice.

ALSO READ: ‘Indian voters drifting rightward on economy’

Categories
India News Legal Politics

Pinarayi highlights need to follow labour laws

The Kerala Chief Minister highlighted concerns about employees facing excessive workloads, threats of dismissal, and denial of labour rights, particularly in the IT industry….reports Asian Lite News

Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan emphasised the importance of strictly adhering to labour laws across all sectors of the country, including the IT sector.

Speaking in the state Assembly, Vijayan highlighted concerns about employees facing excessive workloads, threats of dismissal, and denial of labour rights, particularly in the IT industry.

His remarks came in response to a Calling Attention motion about the recent death of Anna Sebastian, a 26-year-old chartered accountant who allegedly died due to work-related stress just four months after joining Ernst & Young (EY) in Pune.

Vijayan reiterated the need for strict enforcement of labour laws, noting that companies operating in Kerala’s IT parks are required to follow all state labour regulations as part of their lease agreements. If these laws are violated, employees have the right to seek legal recourse.

He also pointed out that while many companies have adopted work-from-home arrangements following the COVID-19 pandemic, current labour laws do not address the duration of such arrangements, leaving gaps in protections for employees.

In response to the tragic case of Anna Sebastian, whose mother accused EY of imposing excessive workloads and long working hours on her daughter, Vijayan assured that the concerns raised would be conveyed to the Union government.

EY has denied the allegations. Sebastian, who had recently passed her CA exams, died in July, sparking further debate over workplace stress and the need for stronger labor protections.

Last month, the Pune Labour commissioner’s team conducted an inspection of the Ernst & Young (EY) office in Pune.

In response to allegations of exploitative work environment, senior officials from the Maharashtra Labour Department conducted a physical inspection at EY’s Pune office on Tuesday.

Shailendra Pol, Additional Labour Commissioner, Pune and his team checked several documents related to Anna at the office. They requested EY to submit the same documents to the department. The documents include information on working rules, welfare policies, and extra working hour policies etc.

“We have checked the working conditions and current situations at the office. We sought information about the working rules, welfare policy of the company, and policies for extra working hours,” Pol stated.

“We have also reviewed the appointment letter of the deceased and the rules and regulations mentioned in it. Once we receive all the requested information, we will submit a report to the Central government, after which they will take further action,” he added.

The senior official of the labour department also claimed the Pune has operated since 2007 without Shop act license but EY has recently applied for the same.

“During our inspection on Monday we have found that the company did not have a license under Shop & Establishment Act Licence since its incorporation in 2007. It is an online process to obtain the shop act license. We have also got the information that they recently applied for it. But we will be sending a show cause notice to the EY Pune office. After the reply further action will be taken,” Shailendra Pol, Additional Labour Commissioner Pune said.

This inspection by the labour department comes after Anna’s mother alleged that her daughter’s death was caused by the excessive workload and pressure at EY. The Union Labour Ministry has taken up the complaint, and a thorough investigation is underway.

CPI (M) marches in solidarity with Palestine

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)) on Monday condemned India’s involvement in the Israel-Hamas conflict, accusing the government of “helping Israel in America’s conspiracy.”

The Himachal Pradesh unit of CPI(M) held a demonstration outside the Deputy Commissioner’s office in Shimla, claiming that similar demonstrations were being carried out nationwide.

Hamas had launched a terror attack on Israel on 7th October last year, killing over 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages. Israel responded with a strong counter-offensive, targeting Hamas, though the increasing civilian casualties have raised concerns over the humanitarian situation. The Gaza Health Ministry reports that more than 35,000 Palestinians have been killed in the conflict.

Kashmir Singh Thakur, a member of CPI(M)’s State Secretariat, alleged that India is assisting Israel by supplying weapons.

“For the past year, Israel has been committing genocide in Palestine, resulting in the deaths of over 40,000 children and women. Hospitals and educational institutions in Palestine are being destroyed. This is an American conspiracy, and the Indian government is helping Israel by selling weapons,” he stated.

Thakur further criticised India’s position, suggesting the government is being disingenuous about its stance on Palestine. “The CPI(M) condemns this alliance. India is acting duplicitously, showing solidarity with Palestine at times and siding with Israel at others, while ultimately supporting America’s conspiracy. The Indian government is complicit in this agenda, and this war must be stopped immediately.”

CPI(M) also held demonstrations in various districts of Uttar Pradesh, showing solidarity with Palestine and urging the Indian government to stop supplying weapons to Israel.

In a post on X, the party stated: “On the anniversary of the attack on Palestine in Gaza, demonstrations were held across districts in Uttar Pradesh under a nationwide call by leftist parties, expressing solidarity with Palestine and demanding an end to the war, and for the Indian government to cease supplying weapons.”

The party also claimed that in Kanpur, the police prevented a protest and shut down the CPI(M) office.

“In Kanpur, the police did not allow the demonstration and forcibly closed the CPI(M) office, though a memorandum was later submitted and a seminar held,” the post concluded. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Pinarayi meets Modi to discuss Wayanad rehabilitation