Category: Politics

  • Thousands of farmers protest 

    Thousands of farmers protest 

    The demonstration, estimated by police to have drawn 13,000 participants, saw protesters holding signs such as “Stand with a farmer, not Starmer”…reports Asian Lite News

    With banners, bullhorns, and toy tractors, thousands of British farmers gathered outside Parliament on Tuesday to protest against a tax hike they claim will deal a “hammer blow” to struggling family farms. 

    British farmers, typically less militant than their European counterparts, have refrained from staging large-scale demonstrations like those seen in France and elsewhere in Europe. However, they now warn they will escalate their actions if the government fails to respond. 

    At the centre of the discontent is the government’s decision to abolish a longstanding tax break from the 1990s that exempts agricultural property from inheritance tax. Under the new rules, farms valued at over £1 million will face a 20% tax when transferred to the next generation upon the owner’s death, effective from April 2026. 

    “Everyone’s furious,” said Olly Harrison, co-organiser of the protest, which saw demonstrators flood the streets near Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Downing Street office. Harrison said many farmers are ready “to block roads and go full French.” 

    Protest organisers urged participants not to bring heavy machinery into central London, but a few tractors adorned with banners reading “the final straw” and “no farmers, no food” rolled past Downing Street. 

    The demonstration, estimated by police to have drawn 13,000 participants, saw protesters holding signs such as “Stand with a farmer, not Starmer.” Children on toy tractors circled Parliament Square following speeches, including one by former Top Gear presenter and celebrity farmer Jeremy Clarkson. Inside Parliament, 1,800 farmers joined a “mass lobby” organised by the National Farmers’ Union (NFU). 

    NFU President Tom Bradshaw criticised the policy as “simply unacceptable,” saying, “It undermines British food security at a time when we need it most.” 

    The tax change adds to mounting challenges for farmers, including volatile weather worsened by climate change, global instability, and the impact of Brexit. Many view the tax hike as the final straw in a series of setbacks. 

    Starmer’s Labour government argues that the majority of farms—around 75%—will remain unaffected by the tax, with various exemptions allowing farming couples to pass estates worth up to £3 million tax-free. The 20% levy is half the 40% inheritance tax applied to other property. 

    Camilla Marshall, a spokesperson for Starmer, acknowledged the decision was “difficult” but confirmed it would not be reconsidered. 

    Proponents of the tax argue it will target wealthy individuals who have purchased farmland as an investment, driving up costs and pricing out younger farmers. “High land prices are robbing young farmers of the dream of owning their own farm,” wrote Environment Secretary Steve Reed. 

    However, the NFU contends that more than 60% of working farms could be affected, noting that while farms may appear valuable on paper, profits are often modest. Government data shows that average farm incomes declined last year, with grazing livestock farms earning around £17,000 and specialist poultry farms generating £143,000. 

    British farmers have endured a turbulent decade. Many supported Brexit, seeing it as an opportunity to escape the EU’s complex Common Agricultural Policy. While some welcomed subsequent reforms, such as payments for promoting biodiversity and restoring nature, others say these benefits have been overshadowed by inflation, mismanagement, and trade deals allowing cheap imports from countries like Australia and New Zealand. 

    Meanwhile, Keir Starmer has denied that he is mounting a class war by targeting wealthy landowners and private schools, after the head of the National Farmers’ Union accused the government of an extraordinary “betrayal” over inheritance tax changes. 

    In an escalating war of words between food producers and ministers, the NFU president, Tom Bradshaw, called the government’s budget measures a “stab in the back”, after the sector had been previously told that taxes such as agricultural property relief (APR) would not be changed. He was addressing hundreds of farmers who had travelled to London to lobby their local MPs. 

    Starmer told reporters at the G20 in Rio de Janeiro that the government was taking a “balanced approach” to fund public services and called on farmers to think about the money needed for schools and hospitals in rural communities. 

    Asked if he was mounting a class war on the wealthiest, Starmer told Sky: “It isn’t at all what we’re doing. It’s a balanced approach. We have to fill a black hole which was left by the last government.” 

    In London, Bradshaw told a room of about 600 farmers: “I don’t think I have ever seen the industry this angry, this disillusioned, this upset.” 

    He described the budget measures as a “shocking policy, built on bad data, and launched with no consultation with anybody that understands”. Bradshaw was applauded by farmers as he commented on the “human impact of this policy” and warned that government measures including changes to national insurance contributions, coupled with a competitive retail environment, would push up food prices. 

    Separately, thousands of food producers gathered close to Downing Street on Tuesday morning for a rally flanked by tractors. Previously, farming businesses qualified for 100% relief on inheritance tax on agricultural and business property. But now the tax is being imposed on farms worth more than £1m, with an effective rate of 20% on assets above that threshold, rather than the normal 40% rate for inheritance tax. 

    Ministers have said the threshold for farmers paying inheritance tax could be £3m for a couple, once various exemptions were taken into account. 

    The NFU has rejected the government’s claims that most farms will not be affected by the change, and believes that it will apply to 75% of what it calls “commercial farm businesses”. 

    A group of farmers from Wales and Wiltshire attending the NFU lobby said they believed all of their farms would fall into the remit of inheritance tax under the budget measures. 

    ALSO READ: UK expected to give Ukraine Storm Shadow missiles   

  • Taiwan opposes Singapore’s stance on One-China policy 

    Taiwan opposes Singapore’s stance on One-China policy 

    Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that Wong and Xi discussed regional and international issues, including developments in the Taiwan Strait…reports Asian Lite News

    Singapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong reaffirmed the country’s “One China” policy during talks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the 31st APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting on Friday, Taiwan News reported on Monday. 

    Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that Wong and Xi discussed regional and international issues, including developments in the Taiwan Strait. According to the ministry, “Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘One China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” as quoted by Taiwan News. 

    China’s state-run Xinhua News Agency cited Wong as emphasising the mutually beneficial nature of Singapore-China relations, which are based on respect and trust. It reported that Wong said, “His country fully understands the Chinese government’s position on the Taiwan question, opposes any form of ‘Taiwan independence,’ and firmly abides by the One China principle.” 

    The Taiwanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) condemned China for using APEC and other international forums to “spread falsehoods that belittle Taiwan’s sovereignty” and mislead international public opinion. The ministry disputed Beijing’s interpretation of Wong’s remarks on Taiwan. 

    After confirming with Singapore, MOFA stated that Wong did not use the specific language reported by China. The ministry urged the international community to denounce “China’s unilateral and deliberate bullying practices that undermine regional peace and stability,” as reported by Taiwan News. 

    China has heightened its military activity around Taiwan since September 2020, deploying aircraft and naval vessels and employing grey zone tactics to achieve its security objectives. 

    Meanwhile, Japan views Taiwan’s existence as “very, very important,” according to Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Chief Representative Kazuyuki Katayama in an interview with Liberty Times (Taipei Times). 

    Katayama underscored the strategic and economic importance of the Taiwan-Japan relationship, highlighting shared values such as democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. He noted strong economic ties between the two nations, particularly in agricultural and animal husbandry trade. Taiwan has eased restrictions on Japanese agricultural products, while Japan has recently started importing Taiwan-raised brown-marbled grouper and pitaya. (ANI) 

    ALSO READ India-Philippines at 75: A Look Back and Ahead 

  • Hong Kong: 45 activists jailed in crackdown on dissent 

    Hong Kong: 45 activists jailed in crackdown on dissent 

    The sentences, ranging from four years to 10 years, mark the culmination of the largest national security case in Hong Kong since the law’s enactment in 2020…reports Asian Lite News

    In a stark demonstration of the tightening grip on dissent, Hong Kong’s High Court on Tuesday sentenced 45 pro-democracy activists to prison terms of up to 10 years under the controversial National Security Law imposed by Beijing. 

    According to the reports by Voice of America, the activists were accused of conspiracy to commit subversion for organising an unofficial primary election in 2020 to select opposition candidates for the Legislative Council. Authorities claimed the activists sought to paralyse the government by blocking budgets and forcing the city’s leader to resign. 

    The sentences, ranging from four years to 10 years, mark the culmination of the largest national security case in Hong Kong since the law’s enactment in 2020. Among those sentenced were prominent figures like Benny Tai (10 years imprisonment), Gwyneth Ho (7 years), and Joshua Wong (4 years and 8 months). 

    According to Maya Wang, associate China director at Human Rights Watch, the harsh sentences reflect the rapid erosion of civil liberties and judicial independence in Hong Kong since the National Security Law was imposed, Voice of America reported. 

    This case, analysts say, signals the end of meaningful political participation and discussion in Hong Kong. 

    Former pro-democracy district councillor Debby Chan told Voice of America that since the activists’ arrest in 2021, there have been no protests or public discussions, and the case has already silenced substantive political discourse. Experts fear that this trial will further restrict Hong Kong’s civil society, setting a dangerous precedent for future attempts at organising political activity. 

    Foreign governments have criticised the trial as politically motivated, urging Hong Kong authorities to release the activists, reported Voice of America. 

    However, Chinese and Hong Kong authorities defend the National Security Law as necessary to restore order after the pro-democracy protests of 2019. Despite this, there are mounting concerns over the treatment of the activists, some of whom are suffering from health issues and some were even denied the chance to visit sick relatives. (ANI) 

    ALSO READ: India-Philippines at 75: A Look Back and Ahead 

  • Pakistan bans large gatherings ahead of PTI rally 

    Pakistan bans large gatherings ahead of PTI rally 

    The PTI plans to protest on Saturday against proposed constitutional amendments it claims aim to undermine judicial independence…reports Asian Lite News

    Punjab government announced on Thursday a six-day ban on public gatherings in Lahore to “maintain law and order” ahead of a planned protest by former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. The ban, imposed under Section 144 of the criminal procedure code, prohibits gatherings of more than four people, citing security concerns. 

    The PTI plans to protest on Saturday against proposed constitutional amendments it claims aim to undermine judicial independence—a charge denied by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s ruling coalition. The party is also rallying public support to demand the release of Khan, who has been in jail since August 2023 and faces multiple legal charges. 

    This move follows similar restrictions earlier this week in Bahawalpur, Faisalabad, and Mianwali, where PTI demonstrations were scheduled. The PTI has criticized the government’s use of Section 144, alleging it is an attempt to stifle their constitutional right to protest and curb their growing public appeal. Known for drawing massive crowds, the party continues to organize rallies to pressure authorities for Khan’s release. 

    The government justified the ban as a measure to “maintain law and order and protect human lives and property,” state broadcaster Radio Pakistan reported. Meanwhile, PTI has announced another demonstration at Islamabad’s Democracy Chowk on Friday, as protests intensify across the country. 

    Tensions remain high in Rawalpindi and other cities. Last Saturday, police dispersed PTI supporters with tear gas during a protest demanding Khan’s release. Earlier in September, over a dozen PTI legislators were arrested for violating rally agreements in Islamabad. 

    The crackdown on PTI follows the May 2023 riots, where party supporters allegedly attacked military and government facilities after Khan’s brief detention. Hundreds of PTI leaders and followers remain in custody, with some facing trial in military courts. Khan’s ouster in 2022 and subsequent fallout with the military have further strained Pakistan’s political landscape.

    ALSO READ:   India-Philippines at 75: A Look Back and Ahead 

  • Stalin, EPS slam LIC over Hindi ‘imposition’ 

    Stalin, EPS slam LIC over Hindi ‘imposition’ 

    Stalin emphasised that such linguistic imposition is inappropriate in India’s multilingual and multicultural context….reports Asian Lite News

    Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin and Leader of the Opposition Edappadi K. Palaniswami (EPS) have strongly criticised the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), accusing the public-sector insurance major of imposing Hindi on its website users. 

    Stalin, in a social media post on X, referred to reports about the predominance of Hindi on LIC’s portal and highlighted that even the language selection option for English was displayed in Hindi. 

    “This is nothing but a cultural and linguistic imposition, trampling on India’s diversity. LIC grew with the patronage of all Indians. How dare it betray the majority of its contributors,” the Chief Minister said. 

    He demanded an immediate rollback of what he termed “linguistic tyranny.” 

    EPS, the AIADMK general secretary who is also the former chief minister of Tamil Nadu, also criticised LIC for making its updated website inaccessible to non-Hindi speakers. 

    “The language selection option being in Hindi makes navigation impossible for non-Hindi users,” he said. 

    EPS further accused the Central government of promoting Hindi persistently and called for English to be set as the default website language. 

    He emphasised that such linguistic imposition is inappropriate in India’s multilingual and multicultural context. 

    The Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) founder and influential Vanniyar community leader, S. Ramadoss, also joined the chorus of criticism. 

    He labelled the prioritisation of Hindi on LIC’s portal as unacceptable given the insurer’s diverse customer base. 

    In a social media post, Ramadoss stated: “Giving sudden priority to Hindi alone is not acceptable. LIC’s customer base includes speakers of many languages across India. The homepage should immediately be changed to English, and a Tamil version of the website should also be launched.” 

    Interestingly, the PMK is an alliance partner of the BJP and a constituent of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in Tamil Nadu. 

    DMK MP T.K.S. Elangovan also criticised the Central government for disregarding India’s linguistic plurality. 

    “This government thinks India is a country with only one language. Even within Hindi-speaking areas, people fight for the rights of their regional languages,” he said in a social media post. 

    Elangovan alleged that the website changes were aimed at deterring non-Hindi speakers from engaging with LIC. 

    Amid the political uproar, LIC issued a clarification, stating that the issue was caused by a technical glitch. 

    In a post on X, LIC said: “Our corporate website was not shuffling the language page due to a technical problem. The issue has now been resolved, and the website is available in both English and Hindi. The inconvenience caused is deeply regretted.” 

    ALSO READ: India-Philippines at 75: A Look Back and Ahead 

  • Kerala may increase retirement age of govt staff to 57

    Kerala may increase retirement age of govt staff to 57

    Kerala is the only state where government employees retire at the age of 56. …reports Asian Lite News

    The Kerala government is mulling to increase the retirement age of government employees to 57 years.

    Sources said that talks between various government stakeholders are underway and an announcement is likely to be made during the New Year when the state budget for the new fiscal will be presented in February by State Finance Minister K.N. Balagopal.

    Kerala is the only state where government employees retire at the age of 56. During the tenure of Oommen Chandy (2011-16) to standardise the retirement age of all employees, it was decided to increase the retirement age from 55 to 56 years.

    As per a recent study by a committee, the state government will be able to divert more than Rs 5,000 crores if the retirement age is increased by one year as the retirement benefits including gratuity and end-of-service benefits for capital spending.

    If the state government is able to go ahead with the proposed plan for the government employees, it will be a major image booster for the CPI-M government as state government employees are unhappy with the Vijayan government on the issue of increase in DA arrears, which at present is around 19 per cent.

    With the local bodies poll due in the second half of 2025 and the Assembly polls scheduled to take place in April 2026, the step is seen as a major step by Vijayan-led government.

    Bypoll underway

    A day after the high voltage campaign for bypolls to Kerala’s Palakkad Assembly seat ended, the three political fronts — LDF, NDA and UDF — on Tuesday claimed that victory will be theirs on November 23 when the votes are counted.

    Incidentally, Palakkad is one of the very few Assembly constituencies among the 140 in the state, where the BJP finished second in the 2021 polls. The by-election campaign witnessed aggression from each side to outdo each other.

    The election was forced upon the electorate after sitting Congress legislator Shafi Parambil contested the Vadakara Lok Sabha constituency where he won after trouncing one of CPI(M)’s most popular faces, sitting legislator and former Health Minister K.K. Shailaja.

    All three political fronts — Left Democratic Front (LDF), National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and United Democratic Front (UDF) — witnessed internal bickering over the candidate selection.

    Of the blocks first was the Congress party which decided to field their popular face and Youth Congress president Rahul Mamkootathil, who is not from the district and soon came expression of displeasure from a few sections. The Congress lost its leader Dr P. Sarin who walked into the CPI(M) camp and was instantly fielded as the Left Independent candidate.

    Things were no different in the BJP too. After a round of discussions and debate, much against the wishes of a section, the BJP decided to field a local leader and a familiar face during election time, Krishnakumar.

    ALSO READ: India-Philippines at 75: A Look Back and Ahead 

  • Kharge seeks President’s intervention in Manipur 

    Kharge seeks President’s intervention in Manipur 

    Kharge in his letter emphasised that both the central and state governments have failed to restore peace and normalcy in the state …reports Asian Lite News

    Amid the continued tension and unrest in Manipur, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday wrote a letter to President Droupadi Murmu, wherein he blamed the the “inordinate inaction” of both Centre and state governments towards restoring peace, and called for her intervention to ensure the protection of the lives and properties of the people of the state. 

    Kharge in his letter emphasised that both the central and state governments have failed to restore peace and normalcy in the state adding that the people of the state have lost confidence in both governments. 

    Congress leader Jairam Ramesh posted Kharge’s letter on X, and said, “@INCIndiaPresident @kharge ji has just written to the President of India on the deteriorating situation in Manipur and the Union Govt’s abysmal failure there over the last eighteen months.” 

    Kharge in the letter said that more the 300 people have lost their last in Manipur for the last 18 months and nearly a lakh of the human population has been displaced. 

    “The country has been inflicted with a grave tragedy of extraordinary proportions due to the unprecedented turmoil in Manipur for the last 18 months, the ongoing turmoil has taken more than 300 human lives, including women, children and even small babies. It has internally displaced nearly a lakh of the human population rendering them homeless and forcing them to live in different relief camps. The agony of the people continues unabated,” the letter said. 

    Expressing concern over the deteriorating living conditions of the people of the state, the Congress chief added, “It has affected the economy of the state and the living conditions of its people with retail inflation going up to 10%. This has made the lives of the people of Manipur extremely difficult. Businesses are closed down, jobs are getting lost, professionals have left their own homes, essential food items, medicines, and essential commodities are in scarcity, national highways have been blocked since May of 2023, schools and educational institutions are shut down, and internally displaced persons are dying of suicide in relief camps. Manipur and its people are suffering silently, which in turn has taken a huge toll on the mental health of the entire population.” 

    “As both the Union Government and the State Government of Manipur have completely failed in restoring peace and normalcy in Manipur during the last 18 months, the people of the state have apparently lost confidence in both the governments and reasonably so. With every passing day, the people of Manipur are becoming insecure on their own soil – their home turf having witnessed their infants, babies, children and women getting mercilessly killed. With no succour coming from the governments involved, they have been finding themselves completely isolated and helpless for more than 540 days now,” the letter added. 

    Kharge further highlighted that Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi has visited Manipur three times in the last 18 months whereas Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not visited even once. 

    Tribals hold ‘coffin rally’ 

    Thousands of men and women on Tuesday took part in a ‘coffin rally’ in Manipur’s Churachandpur in solidarity with the 10 Kuki-Zo-Hmar tribal ‘Village Volunteers’, who were killed in a reported encounter with CRPF in Jiribam district on November 11. 

    Jointly organised by Zomi Students’ Federation, Kuki Students’ Organisation and Hmar Students’ Association, thousands of men and women wearing black attire symbolically carried 10 dummy coffins to pay homage to the 10 slain Village Volunteers as all the 10 bodies are still kept in the morgue of a local hospital. 

    The three tribal organisations on Monday urged the authorities of all schools and colleges in Churachandpur district and adjoining areas to close down their educational institutions and to send students from Class X and above to participate in Tuesday’s rally. 

    The three organisations also urged people from all walks of life to participate in the ‘coffin rally’ in large numbers. After the post-mortem of all ten bodies was conducted in Assam’s Silchar Medical College and Hospital, the bodies were airlifted on November 16 to Churachandpur, a Kuki-Zo-Hmar inhabited district. 

    The Indigenous Tribal Leaders’ Forum (ITLF), an apex body of the Kuki-Zo community in Manipur, earlier said that they have decided that the last rites of 10 Village Volunteers, would not be performed till their postmortem examination reports are handed over to the families. “We have not yet received the post-mortem reports. We would wait for autopsy reports of all the martyrs’ bodies. We would not bury the martyrs before that,” senior ITLF leader Ginza Vualzong told the media after Sunday’s meeting. 

    He said: “Our martyrs’ bodies would be placed in the district hospital morgue until post-mortem reports are available.” Vualzong said that after receiving the post-mortem reports of all 10 of them, an expert in this field would carefully review the autopsy reports for any irregularity. 

    ALSO READ: Palestine Grateful for India’s Support

  • ‘Super year’ of polls super bad for incumbents   

    ‘Super year’ of polls super bad for incumbents   

    Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election was just the latest in a long line of losses for incumbent parties in 2024…reports Asian Lite News

    Whether on the left or the right, regardless of how long they’ve been in power, sitting governments around the world have been drubbed this year by disgruntled voters in what has been called the “super year” for elections. 

    Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election was just the latest in a long line of losses for incumbent parties in 2024, with people in some 70 countries accounting for about half the world’s population going to the polls. 

    Issues driving voter discontent have varied widely, though there has been almost universal malaise since the COVID-19 pandemic as people and businesses struggle to get back on their feet while facing stubbornly high prices, cash-strapped governments and a surge in migration. 

    “There’s an overall sense of frustration with political elites, viewing them as out of touch, that cuts across ideological lines,” said Richard Wike, director of global attitudes research at the Pew Research Center. 

    He noted that a Pew poll of 24 countries found that the appeal of democracy itself was slipping as voters reported increasing economic distress and a sense that no political faction truly represents them. 

    “Lots of factors are driving this,” Wike said, “but certainly feelings about the economy and inflation are a big factor.” 

    Since the pandemic hit in 2020, incumbents have been removed from office in 40 of 54 elections in Western democracies, said Steven Levitsky, a political scientist at Harvard University, revealing “a huge incumbent disadvantage.” 

    In Britain, the right-of-center Conservatives suffered their worst result since 1832 in July’s election, which returned the center-left Labour Party to power after 14 years. 

    But just across the English Channel, the far right rocked the governing parties of France and Germany, the European Union’s biggest and most powerful members, in June elections for the parliament of the 27-nation bloc. 

    The results pushed French President Emmanuel Macron to call a parliamentary election in hope of stemming a far-right surge at home. The anti-immigration National Rally party won the first round, but alliances and tactical voting knocked it down to third place in the second round, producing a fragile government atop a divided legislature. 

    In Asia, a group of South Korean liberal opposition parties, led by the Democratic Party, defeated the ruling conservative People Power Party in April’s parliamentary elections. 

    India’s Narendra Modi, meanwhile, had been widely expected to easily sweep to a third straight term in June but instead voters turned away from his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in droves, costing it its majority in parliament, though it was able to remain in power with the help of allies. 

    Likewise, Japanese voters in October punished the Liberal Democratic Party, which has governed the country nearly without interruption since 1955. 

    Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba will stay in power, but the greater-than-expected loss ended the LDP’s one-sided rule, giving the opposition a chance to achieve policy changes long opposed by the conservatives. 

    “If you were to ask me to explain Japan in a vacuum, that’s not too difficult,” said Paul Nadeau, an adjunct assistant professor at Temple University’s Japan campus in Tokyo. 

    “Voters were punishing an incumbent party for a corruption scandal, and this gave them a chance to express a lot more frustrations that they already had.” 

    Globally, however, it’s harder to draw conclusions. 

    “This is pretty consistent across different situations, different countries, different elections — incumbents are getting a crack on the shins,” he said. “And I don’t have any good big picture explanations for why that is.” 

    Rob Ford, professor of political science at the University of Manchester, said inflation has been a major driver of “the greatest wave of anti-incumbent voting ever seen” — though the reasons behind the backlash may also be “broader and more diffuse.” 

    “It could be something directly to do with the long-term effects of the COVID pandemic — a big wave of ill health, disrupted education, disrupted workplace experiences and so forth making people less happy everywhere, and they are taking it out on governments,” he said. 

    “A kind of electoral long COVID.” 

    In South Africa, high unemployment and inequality helped drive a dramatic loss of support for the African National Congress, which had governed for three decades since the end of the apartheid system of white minority rule. The party once led by Nelson Mandela lost its parliamentary majority in May’s election and was forced to go into coalition with opposition parties. 

    Other elections in Africa presented a mixed picture, said Alex Vines, director of the African Program at the international affairs think tank Chatham House, partially clouded by countries with authoritarian leaders whose reelections were not in doubt, like Rwanda’s long-serving President Paul Kagame who got 99 percent of the vote. 

    In African countries with strong democratic institutions, however, the pattern of incumbents being punished holds, Vines said. 

    “The countries with stronger institutions — South Africa, Senegal, Botswana — have witnessed either a government of national unity or change of party of government,” he said. 

    In Botswana, voters unexpectedly ejected a party that had ruled for 58 years since independence from Britain in an October election. 

    Vines said that across the continent, “you’ve got this electorate now who have no memory of decolonization or the end of apartheid and so have different priorities, who are also feeling the cost-of-living pressures.” 

    In Latin America, one major country stands out for bucking the anti-incumbent wave – Mexico. 

    Andrés Manuel López Obrador, limited to a single term, selected Claudia Sheinbaum, a member of his party, to succeed him. Sheinbaum easily won the presidency in June’s election. 

    Wike noted that Mexico is one of the few countries in Pew’s survey where voters reported satisfaction with economic conditions. 

    Some newcomers to office have already found that the honeymoon following their victories has been short, as people have rapidly turned on them. 

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has seen his approval ratings plummet from a jaded electorate that wants lower prices and better public services — but is deeply skeptical of politicians’ intention and ability to deliver change. 

    Ford, of the University of Manchester, said it’s a problem for democracy when voters, whose task is to hold governments to account, are so quick to pass judgment. 

    “If voters are the electoral equivalent of a hanging judge, putting politicians to the gallows whether they be guilty or innocent, then what incentive is there for governments to try?” he asked. “The angels and the devils get chucked out alike, but being an angel is harder.” 

    Trump first came to power as a challenger in the 2016 election, and then lost as an incumbent in the 2020 election to Joe Biden. This year, he defeated Biden’s vice president, Kamala Harris, who stepped in late in the race when the president unexpectedly dropped out. 

    Trump’s win is one of the conservative populist movement’s highest-profile triumphs. But another icon of the cause, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, saw his own party suffer its worst showing in decades in this year’s European Union election, demonstrating that no movement is safe from backlash. 

    Nadeau, of Temple University, suggested that perhaps analysts had previously misunderstood global electoral trends — parsing them as ideological shifts — “when all along it was actually an anti-incumbent mood.” 

    “Maybe it has always been anti-incumbent, and we were just misdiagnosing it,” he said. 

    ALSO READ: Biden, Modi Cap Partnership at G20 Summit

  • Trump returns to MSG in style

    Trump returns to MSG in style

    The visit to the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) was his first appearance before a mass audience since winning the election..reports Asian Lite News

    US President-elect Donald Trump has made a triumphant return to the Madison Square Garden (MSG) with his entourage of high-level nominees and advisers to watch a mixed martial arts championship.

    He was welcomed to shouts of “USA, USA!” that was the rallying cry of his campaign.

    The visit to the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) was his first appearance before a mass audience since winning the election, and it was dominated by a crowd of mixed martial arts fans that reflects the most hard-core of his supporters, young men, although people of other ethnicities in the crown..

    He was accompanied by Tulsi Gabbard, his nominee for director of national intelligence, and his leaders for the proposed Office of Government Efficiency, Robert F Kennedy Jr, the health secretary pick, and his now ever-present adviser Elon Musk, the multi-billionaire entrepreneur, and Vivek Ramaswamy, the pharmaceutical multimillionaire.

    His sentencing had been set in the city on Tuesday for his conviction in the “hush money” case, but the hearing has been postponed to November 26, as his lawyers and local prosecutors, as well as the judge, grapple with the constitutional and political implications of sentencing a man who will take over as the President in about two months.

    Trump held a massive rally at the MSG, the week before the election, which was an omen for the broadening of his base among minorities and its solidifying among the working class.

    Even though Vice President Kamala Harris prevailed in the deep blue city, Trump had increased his share of votes by 7 per cent to 30 per cent from the 23 per cent he had won against President Biden in 2020 – a trend of across the country that vaulted him to the presidency in terms of the popular votes as well the Electoral College votes.

    The UFC champion, Jon Jones, presented Trump with his championship belt and told the roaring crowd, “I also wanna say a big, big thank you to President Donald Trump for being here tonight”.

    Trump did not speak at the event.

    Mixed martial arts is a virtually no-holds-barred, crude type of fighting where contestants can resort to boxing, wrestling, and martial arts.

    Jones won with a knock-out kick to his rival Stipe Miocic.

    Steven Cheung, Trump’s nominee for White House director of communications, had held the same post at the UFC.

    The visit to New York was his second outing from his Mar-a-Lago mansion in Florida, where he has been working on his transition.

    On Wednesday, he went to Washington for a meeting with Biden.

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a massive rally in 2014 during his New York visit after his first national election victory.

    ALSO READ: UN faces uncertainty as Trump returns   

  • When Starmer meets Xi… 

    When Starmer meets Xi… 

    Prime minister wants bilateral at G20 to lead to closer ties with China, which he sees as key to faster growth…reports Asian Lite News

    Keir Starmer will become the first UK prime minister in six years to meet the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, promising to turn the page on UK-China relations by building “a pragmatic and serious relationship”. 

    Starmer and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, have been pursuing a thawing of relations with the world’s second-largest economy on pragmatic grounds, suggesting that the UK cannot achieve its growth ambitions without better terms with China. 

    But the move to deepen ties is likely to be controversial among human rights groups and backbenchers, and with several high-profile Conservative MPs who have had sanctions imposed on them by China. 

    Tom Tugendhat and Alicia Kearns, both prominent Tory critics of China, called on Starmer to use the meeting to raise with Xi the plight of UK nationals including Jimmy Lai, the pro-democracy media owner detained and tried in Hong Kong. 

    Starmer will meet the Chinese president on Monday in Rio de Janeiro at the G20 summit, a meeting of world leaders that is likely to be marked by divisions over the climate crisis and Ukraine. No British prime minister has met Xi since Theresa May visited Beijing in 2018 in the midst of a trade push during Brexit negotiations, though Boris Johnson spoke to the Chinese president during the pandemic. 

    Since then, relations have significantly cooled because of cyber threats, a human rights crackdown in Hong Kong and the sanctions against British MPs. Rishi Sunak attempted to renew relations at the G20 summit in 2022 where a bilateral was planned but cancelled due to Ukraine developments. But Conservative leaders have toyed with designating China a threat to British security – stronger language than the US had used. 

    Those to have had Chinese sanctions imposed upon them include Tugendhat, the former security minister; Nusrat Ghani, the Commons deputy speaker; and Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader. Tugendhat said: “Jimmy Lai – a British citizen – is being put on a show trial in Hong Kong. Others are being threatened here in the UK. 

    “It is essential that Starmer raises Mr Lai’s case and the threats we are witnessing against other British nationals who have spoken out who are now here in the UK. Starmer must clearly defend Britain against Beijing’s authoritarian regime.” Kearns, who is a shadow foreign minister, said: “The sham trial of British citizen Jimmy Lai recommences on Wednesday, yet it is glaringly absent from Starmer’s comments. British interests are achieved by being set out clearly, not as ‘by the ways’ cast to the sidelines of discussions. Starmer needs to call for Jimmy’s release now, and be unequivocal with Xi Jinping.” 

    The foreign secretary, David Lammy, visited China last month in the first signal that the new Labour government saw a renewal of better ties as a priority. Reeves, who is understood to be taking a leading role in pursuing new economic opportunities with China, will head to Beijing in January. In remarks before his meeting with Xi, Starmer sought to head off gloomy predictions for the summit, at which there will be a number of world leaders who are facing election defeat. Additionally, Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, has said he will not attend the summit, but his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, will be there. 

    “It is in the UK’s best interests to engage on the global stage – whether that’s building strong and fruitful partnerships with our closest allies or being frank with those whose values differ from our own,” Starmer said. The prime minister expects to meet at least eight world leaders in one-to-one discussions in Rio. 

    Speaking to reporters en route to the summit, Starmer underlined the need for a realistic approach, saying it was important that he met Xi and stressing the potential economic benefits – without mentioning the potential security risks to better relations. “We are both global players, global powers, both permanent members of the security council and of the G20. China’s economy is obviously the second biggest in the world,” he said. 

    “It’s one of our biggest trading partners and therefore I will be having serious, pragmatic discussions with the president when I meet him.” Asked if the intention was to improve on the relations since the Conservative government, Starmer said: “I do think it’s important that we have serious engagement, which is what I will be pursuing in my bilateral at the G20.” 

    No 10 said that any change in relations would be “rooted at all times in the UK’s national interests” but said there were “clear areas of mutual cooperation – including on international stability, climate and growth”. It said Starmer would be “firm on the need to have honest conversations on areas of disagreement, while competing and challenging where we have to.”  

    Starmer has faced some criticism at home for the number of days he has spent abroad since taking office, and this trip amounts to another four days away from the UK. Starmer defended the trip – the first visit by a British prime minister to Brazil in 12 years – as a chance to catalyse relations with rising economic powers in Latin America, suggesting common ground with Brazil’s leftwing president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, on green energy and protecting workers’ rights. ]

    ALSO READ: UK’s envoy on superbugs says scale of threat underestimated