Category: Politics

  • UK Parliament to consider assisted dying law  

    UK Parliament to consider assisted dying law  

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer promised earlier this year to give lawmakers a free vote on the issue, meaning Labour, which won an election in July, will not instruct its members how to vote…reports Asian Lite News

    British lawmakers will soon consider whether to give terminally ill adults a choice to end their own lives with medical assistance, after what proponents sayis a shift in public opinion since a similar measure was rejected a decade ago.

    Kim Leadbeater, a lawmaker from Britain’s governing Labour Party who won a ballot giving her the right to introduce a bill on a subject of her choice, confirmed on Thursday that she would present a bill on assisted dying on Oct. 16.

    “I … strongly believe that we should give people facing the most unbearable end to their life a choice about what that end is like,” she wrote in The Guardian newspaper.

    The law is expected to allow mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live to choose whether to end their lives, and allow medics to help them. Under current law, assisting suicide is punishable by up to 14 years in jail.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer promised earlier this year to give lawmakers a free vote on the issue, meaning Labour, which won an election in July, will not instruct its members how to vote. Other parties have also told their members they can vote according to their consciences.

    A number of lawmakers from all of Britain’s major parties remain sceptical, notably expressing concern that terminally ill patients who are vulnerable and feel they are being a burden to their families could face pressure to end their lives.

    “While I deeply respect the debate, I have yet to see legislation that fully addresses concerns around coercion or doubt,” Labour lawmaker James Frith wrote on X. “If a vote were held today, I would vote against assisted dying.”

    Those who accompany relatives choosing euthanasia in places such as Switzerland, where it has been legal since 1942, can now face prosecution in Britain for assisting suicide.

    In recent years, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and some U.S. states have legalised assisted dying under certain circumstances. Within the UK, the devolved parliament in Scotland, which sets its own laws on such matters, is considering similar legislation.

    Polling of 2,000 Britons published by research group Savanta on Friday showed 48% supported it, 21% opposed it, 22% say they neither support or oppose it and the rest don’t know.

    “This is a historic opportunity to bring about real change for dying people … The mood in Westminster has shifted dramatically, at last catching up with public opinion,” said Sarah Wootton, head of the campaign group Dignity in Dying.

    Starmer faces Commons vote on Chagos Islands handover

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be forced to hold a vote on the Chagos Islands amid fury over his decision to hand them over to Mauritius. The Government said on Thursday that the strategically important Indian Ocean archipelago would be transferred, after being in British hands since 1814.

    The Prime Minister immediately came under fire over the move, which was announced during parliamentary recess without MPs getting a say in the Commons. Robert Jenrick, the frontrunner to become the next Tory leader, said the Conservative Party must display its “staunch opposition to the principle of the agreement”.

    Mark Francois, the former Armed Forces minister said, “It’s appalling how Labour have deliberately announced their abject surrender over the Chagos Islands during a  Parliamentary recess.” A plane takes off while others stand on a runway

    He added: “This is even more pressing, before Argentina ups its rhetoric over the Falklands or Spain does over Gibraltar – we now need both of those other claims categorically refuted, on the floor of the House, early next week.”

    A Government minister on Saturday was forced to issue a statement on the territories after the Prime Minister on Friday did not rule out signing them away.

    Stephen Doughty, the minister for UK Overseas Territories, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: “British sovereignty of the Falkland Islands, Gibraltar or any other of our overseas territories is not up for negotiation. “The Chagos Islands are a very different issue, with a very different history.”

    Labour claimed the deal would safeguard global security by ending a long-running dispute, which followed a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in favour of Mauritius in 2018.

    Robert Buckland, who represented the UK as solicitor general in the ICJ case, said the Government’s approach was “underhand”. The former justice secretary told The Telegraph that the decision “flies in the face of the evidence”.

    “The evidence I presented and saw did not get even close to Mauritius having a claim,” he added.

    Tom Tugendhat, the former security minister and Tory leadership contender, raised concerns about the implications for wider Western security of ceding the Chagos Islands.

    He said: “The islands’ Diego Garcia air base is not just strategically important – it sits in the middle of the Indian Ocean and operates as a fixed aircraft carrier giving us strategic reach over Afghanistan and eastern Iran and dominates the sea lanes and sits at the heart of a maritime conservation zone. That makes it a serious strategic prize for any global power. And without control over the outlying islands, we have less control over what happens next door.”

    Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, also expressed outrage at the decision, with the party planning to table an urgent question in the Commons on Monday. Farage wrote to David Lammy on Saturday to demand that a vote take place “at the earliest opportunity”, saying the way that the decision had been made meant MPs “from all parties remain in the dark about so many aspects of this decision”.

    ALSO READ: India Can Convince Israel To Stop Escalation In Middle East, Says Iran

  • More charter flights to evacuate Britons 

    More charter flights to evacuate Britons 

    The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) said it was ready to support “hundreds” more to leave Lebanon in the coming days…reports Asian Lite News

    Britain will charter more flights to help citizens and dependents leave Lebanon, the foreign office said on Thursday as Israel continued to strike Beirut overnight.

    More than 150 British nationals and their dependents were evacuated from the Lebanese capital on a UK government chartered flight that arrived in Birmingham, central England, on Wednesday, the ministry said.

    “A limited number” of flights will depart from Beirut’s Rafic Hariri International Airport on Thursday, and “will continue for as long as the security situation allows,” it added.

    The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) said it was ready to support “hundreds” more to leave Lebanon in the coming days.

    The statement came a day after Defense Secretary John Healey visited Cyprus, where 700 British troops and staff are stationed to prepare for the possible evacuations.

    Many commercial airlines have suspended flights to and from Beirut.

    “Recent events have demonstrated the volatility of the situation in Lebanon,” Foreign Secretary David Lammy said Thursday, reiterating his message for nationals to “leave the country immediately.”

    As of last week, there were around 5,000 British nationals, dual nationals and dependents in Lebanon, according to government estimates.

    Israel has intensified its bombing of southern Lebanon and parts of Beirut, saying it aims to secure its northern border after nearly a year of hostilities with Iran-backed Hezbollah.

    The fighting has cost more than 1,000 lives in Lebanon so far.

    The British government has confirmed that two of its fighter jets and a tanker were involved in responding to Iran’s firing of a barrage of missiles at Israel on Tuesday, although they “did not engage any targets.”

    EU announces extra €30 mn humanitarian aid

    Meanwhile, The European Commission announced on Thursday an extra $33.1 million in humanitarian aid for Lebanon, which has been hit by clashes between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah.

    “I am extremely concerned by the constant escalation of tensions in the Middle East. All parties must do their outmost to protect the lives of innocent civilians,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

    This comes in addition to the 10 million euros already announced on Sept. 29 and brings total EU humanitarian assistance to the country to over 104 million euros this year.

    WHO warning

    At least 28 on-duty medics have been killed in the past 24 hours in Lebanon, where Israel has launched airstrikes and sent troops to fight Hezbollah in an escalating conflict, the World Health Organization chief said on Thursday.

    “Many (other) health workers are not reporting to duty and fled the areas where they work due to bombardments,” Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told an online press briefing, calling for stronger protections for health workers.

    “This is severely limiting the provision of mass trauma management and continuity of health services,” he said.

    The global health agency will not be able to deliver a large planned shipment of trauma and medical supplies to the country on Friday due to flight restrictions, he added.

    WHO’s representative in Lebanon Dr. Abdinasir Abubakar told the briefing that all of the health care workers killed in the past day had been on duty, helping with the wounded.

    A total of nearly 2,000 people have been killed, including 127 children, and 9,384 injured since the start of Israeli attacks on Lebanon over the last year, the country’s health ministry said.

    “Hospitals have been already evacuated. I think what I can say for now is the capacity for mass casualty management exists, but it’s just a matter of time until the system actually reaches its limit,” said the WHO’s Abubakar.

    ALSO READ: Iran will pay a price, says Israel envoy to India

  • Boris claims late Queen had bone cancer

    Boris claims late Queen had bone cancer

    In the book, the 60-year-old recalled travelling to the royal residence of Balmoral for the customary outgoing audience and resignation…reports Asian Lite News

    Late Queen Elizabeth II had a form of bone cancer in her final years, former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson claimed in his memoir. In the book, titled ‘Unleashed’, which will be released on 10 October, Johnson recalled the monarch’s final days at Balmoral, Scotland.

    He also described the queen’s appearance days before she died on September 8, 2022. Notably, the ex- PM’s account is the first public indication by a former senior government official as to what the Queen’s cause of death might have been. It is listed as “old age” on her death certificate.

    “I had known for a year or more that she had a form of bone cancer, and her doctors were worried that at any time she could enter a sharp decline,” Boris Johnson wrote in the excerpt.

    In the book, the 60-year-old recalled travelling to the royal residence of Balmoral for the customary outgoing audience and resignation. He described Queen Elizabeth in her last days, saying, “She seemed pale and more stooped, and she had dark bruising on her hands and wrists, probably from drips or injections”.

    “But her mind – as Edward (Queen’s private secretary) had also said – was completely unimpaired by her illness, and from time to time in our conversation, she still flashed that great white smile in its sudden mood-lifting beauty,” Johnson wrote.

    Boris Johnson described the weekly prime minister audiences with Queen Elizabeth as a “privilege” and a “balm”. “She radiated such an ethic of service, patience and leadership that you really felt you would, if necessary, die for her,” he continued.

    “That may sound barmy to some people (and totally obvious to many more), but that loyalty, primitive as it may appear, is still at the heart of our system. You need someone kind and wise, and above politics, to personify what is good about our country. She did that job brilliantly,” he added.

    Notably Buckingham Palace has a policy not to comment on books released about the royal family and, as such, has not confirmed or denied Johnson’s assertions.

    Meanwhile, in the same book, Johnson has also claimed that Buckingham Palace asked him to persuade Prince Harry not to quit royal life or leave the UK shortly before the Sussexes moved to North America.

    He wrote that he delivered a “manly pep talk” to the Duke of Sussex in a bid to convince him it would be a mistake to leave Britain. He said that officials in Downing Street and Buckingham Palace approached him in January 2020, believing that he might be able to dissuade Prince Harry of his decision.

    ALSO READ: EU and UK agree to strengthen cooperation

  • Gandhi Jayanti: Indian missions celebrate power of non-violence

    Gandhi Jayanti: Indian missions celebrate power of non-violence

    The Indian Embassy in Nepal commemorated the day by hosting a morning of hymns and musical compositions in Kathmandu…reports Asian Lite News

    Indian missions all over the subcontinent celebrated the 155th Gandhi Jayanti on Wednesday by hosting events that honoured the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi. 

    The Indian Embassy in Nepal commemorated the day by hosting a morning of hymns and musical compositions in Kathmandu.

    “The ambassador paid floral tribute to Mahatma Gandhi. On this occasion, Saraswati Khatri of Sur Sudha Band performed hymns and musical compositions dedicated to Mahatma Gandhi,” the Embassy said in a post on X.

    During the event, Indian Ambassador to Nepal Naveen Srivastava emphasised the relevance of Mahatma Gandhi’s principles and teachings in today’s world.

    Lyudmila Sekacheva, President of the BRICS World of Traditions NGO, also spoke at the event. She has been instrumental in setting up of Tolstoy-Gandhi Centres in Russia and India and discussed the lasting influence of Gandhi’s messages.

    The Embassy also informed that representatives from the Nepal Charkha Pracharak Gandhi-Tulasi Smarak Mahaguthi participated in the celebrations, while artists from JNCC Moscow and students of the EOI school presented cultural performances. Indian community members also attended the event.

    As part of the occasion, Ambassador Srivastava felicitated sanitation workers at the Embassy for their contribution to maintaining a clean and hygienic environment.

    Meanwhile, the High Commission of India in Bangladesh also celebrated the 155th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, highlighting his teachings of non-violence.

    “The Indian High Commission in Dhaka marked the 155th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi today. In his address, HC Pranay Verma said Gandhiji’s unwavering faith in peace, non-violence, tolerance and understanding as a force for change continues to remain relevant even today,” the High Commission said in a post on X.

    The High Commissioner also stressed that Gandhi Jayanti is recognised internationally as the International Day of Non-Violence, underscoring the importance of Gandhiji’s teachings in addressing modern global challenges like terrorism.

    In Colombo, newly-appointed Sri Lankan Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya, along with Indian High Commissioner Santosh Jha, paid tribute to Mahatma Gandhi.

    Officials of the the Indian Embassy in Bhutan, led by Indian Ambassador Sudhakar Dalela, paid floral tributes to Mahatma Gandhi and took the Swachhata Pledge, committing to maintaining cleanliness in their surroundings.

    ALSO READ: Doval, French FM discuss Europe, West Asia wars 

    ALSO READ: Erosion of Pakistan’s National Sovereignty

  • Erosion of Pakistan’s National Sovereignty

    Erosion of Pakistan’s National Sovereignty

    Many recent events vividly illustrate the extent of China’s leverage over Pakistan and, the significant decline in Pakistan’s autonomous decision-making apparatus…reports Asian Lite News

    It is highly unusual for a sovereign state to allow another state to establish a security apparatus, even if it is a joint arrangement, within its territorial boundaries. Such an agreement inherently implies a profound dysfunction or incapacity within the host state’s security framework – specifically, its national military – and represents a deliberate compromise of its sovereignty.

    The reported success of China’s coercive diplomacy in persuading the Pakistani government to authorise the formation of a joint security force on Pakistani soil, ostensibly to protect Chinese interests and personnel, highlights the ongoing entrenched practices within Pakistan, particularly regarding the pervasive influence of the Pakistan Army.

    A recent report by Nikkei Asia titled ‘China eye security tie-ups after deadly militant attacks’ indicates that the Pakistani government has consented to a bilateral agreement facilitating the establishment of joint security companies with Beijing, thereby officially allowing Chinese security officials to operate within Pakistan’s borders.

    The report further reveals that this arrangement would enable these forces to transport Chinese nationals in armoured vehicles as part of the security measures. This development not only marks a significant departure from previous frameworks governing Sino-Pakistani relations but also constitutes a direct infringement on Pakistan’s sovereignty, sanctioned by the very institution tasked with its defence—the Pakistan Army.

    Moreover, this arrangement highlights China’s apparent lack of confidence in the Pakistan Army’s ability to adequately protect its personnel, infrastructure, and strategic interests amid an increasingly deteriorating security environment that has repeatedly targeted Chinese nationals and projects in recent years.

    Pakistan has experienced a marked escalation in terrorism-related incidents in recent years, significantly undermining its internal security. Despite conducting thousands of intelligence-based operations (IBOs) across the country’s hinterland, the Pakistani security establishment has struggled to contain the violence.

    Data from the Islamabad-based Centre for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) reveals that the country recorded nearly 500 terrorist attacks in the first six months of 2024 alone, resulting in more than 800 fatalities, primarily among its security officials.

    However, what is particularly notable is the discernible increase in the targeting of Chinese personnel and China-affiliated projects, especially within the provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. Both of these provinces have been epicentres of protracted insurgencies for decades, challenging the Pakistani state’s authority over their lands.

    In recent years, relations between Islamabad and Beijing have significantly deepened, with China’s presence rapidly expanding across Pakistan, primarily under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship initiative of the broader Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

    This growing Chinese footprint includes not only extensive infrastructure projects but also considerable involvement in the extraction of Pakistan’s natural resources, particularly in the mineral-rich province of Balochistan.

    This increased Chinese engagement, especially in resource extraction, has intensified local grievances, as the local populations remain marginalised and deprived of basic amenities and essential services, escalating tensions and fuelling discontent in an already volatile region.

    Consequently, China is perceived as a direct beneficiary of Pakistan’s exploitation of Balochistan’s mineral resources and is thus seen as complicit in exacerbating the hardships faced by the local people.

    In March of this year, Pakistan faced a series of significant attacks within a single week, all explicitly targeting Chinese interests and nationals. On March 20, the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) launched an assault on the heavily fortified Gwadar Port Authority Complex in Balochistan.

    This complex houses the offices of port officials alongside commercial spaces. Gwadar port is considered a key project within the $65 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) initiative, serving as a symbolic and strategic nexus for Chinese investment in the region.

    The insurgents’ ability to penetrate deeply into the complex revealed critical vulnerabilities within Pakistan’s security framework. Following this, on March 25, Baloch insurgents attacked the Pakistan Naval Station (PNS) Siddique base in Turbat, claiming it was a response to China’s expanding presence in Balochistan.

    However, the most significant attack occurred on March 26, 2024, when a suicide bomber targeted a convoy transporting Chinese workers near Bisham city in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s Shangla district. The convoy was en route to the Dasu hydropower project, which is being constructed by a Chinese company in the Upper Kohistan district.

    It is worth noting that nine Chinese nationals were killed in a similar incident in Dasu in 2021 when a bus carrying Chinese workers was attacked by a suicide bomber. These incidents highlight the ongoing security challenges faced by Chinese projects and personnel, as well as the Pakistani government’s failure to address such threats effectively.

    The loss of Chinese lives prompted a notable shift in Beijing’s stance; Chinese officials began openly criticising the Pakistani government for its inability to protect Chinese nationals and its critical infrastructure projects within the country.

    On March 27, China’s Foreign Office issued a strongly worded statement urging the Pakistani government to “thoroughly investigate the incident as soon as possible, hunt down the perpetrators, and bring them to justice.”

    This diplomatic rebuke underscored Beijing’s growing frustration with the deteriorating security situation in Pakistan, with senior Chinese officials like Liu Jianchao, Minister of the International Liaison Department of the Communist Party of China (CPC), continuously pressing Islamabad regarding its failures to tackle the escalating threats to Chinese interests.

    The repeated and monumental failures of the Pakistani state to safeguard Chinese nationals and protect the strategic CPEC projects, coupled with the escalating debt obligations owed to Beijing, strongly suggest a substantial erosion of Pakistan’s sovereign decision-making capacity.

    A salient example of this dynamic can be observed in the lead-up to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s visit to China in June 2024. Beijing reportedly set explicit preconditions for the visit, contingent upon Islamabad’s commitment to launch a comprehensive military operation akin to the 2014 Zarb-e-Azb campaign.

    In compliance, the desperate Pakistani government announced “Operation Azm-e-Istehkam” within two weeks of Sharif’s return from China on June 22, a move that was met with approval from Chinese officials.

    Furthermore, Liu Jianchao, a senior Communist Party official, was stationed in Islamabad ahead of this development, emphasising in an all-party gathering on June 21 that a growing ‘internal security deficit’ constituted a major threat to Beijing’s CPEC cooperation with Pakistan and hence required urgent attention from the Pakistani government.

    This sequence of events vividly illustrates the extent of China’s leverage over Pakistan and, conversely, the significant decline in Pakistan’s autonomous decision-making apparatus.

    In this context, alongside reports of Beijing’s ongoing pressure on Islamabad to cede operational control of Gwadar Port to the Chinese navy for establishing a military base, and the recent “agreement” allowing Chinese security personnel to operate within Pakistan’s borders, the increasing entanglement of foreign influence in areas traditionally reserved for sovereign authority becomes increasingly apparent.

    These developments raise serious concerns about the erosion of Pakistan’s national sovereignty and the broader implications for its governance and autonomy.

    ALSO READ: China unveils regulations on network data security management

  • PIA stops flights from using Iranian airspace

    PIA stops flights from using Iranian airspace

    The PIA issued a direction to all captains and flight operations of the airline in this regard….reports Asian Lite News

    Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) late on Tuesday announced that it has stopped all its flights from using Iranian airspace following Iran’s missile attack on Israel.

    The PIA issued a direction to all captains and flight operations of the airline in this regard.

    “The plans of all flights are being restructured to avoid using Iranian airspace,” PIA spokesperson Athar Awan said in a statement.

    “Iranian airspace will not be used until the situation becomes clear. The PIA uses two corridors through Iranian airspace, northern corridor is used for flights to Canada and Turkey and southern corridor for flights to UAE, Bahrain, Doha, and Saudi Arabia,” said the spokesperson.

    Meanwhile, IDF on Tuesday night released footage of hundreds of Iranian missiles as they rained over the Old City in Jerusalem on Tuesday in a major escalation of the raging conflict in the Middle East.

    The IDF is in its statement said that the Iranian regime targets everyone, as the site is a holy site for Muslims, Christians and Jews.

    In a post on X, the IDF said, “Watch as Iranian missiles rain over the Old City in Jerusalem, a holy site for Muslims, Christians and Jews. This is the target of the Iranian regime: everyone.”

    The IDF further said that it intercepted ‘a large number’ of the 180 ballistic missiles launched from Iran. The Times of Israel reports that Israelis have now been told they can leave shelters after Iranian attack of 180 ballistic missiles

    Benny Gantz, head of Israel’s opposition National Unity Party, condemned Iran’s attack.

    “Iran crossed the border again. The State of Israel has capabilities that have been developed over the years to strike at Iran and the government has full backing to act with strength and determination. It’s either us or them, and the mission is clear: Whoever attacks – will be attacked, and will be hurt,” he said.

    Contrary to the statement of the IDF, Iran’s state-run media channel, Press TV, claimed, “80% of missiles fired at occupied territories hit targets”.

    The Iranian mission to the UN said that Iran’s legal, rational, and legitimate response to the terrorist acts of the Zionist regime has been duly carried out.

    ALSO READ: US panel on China urges halt on Chinese drones

  • ‘Unacceptable’: Congress slams detention of Wangchuk at Singhu border

    ‘Unacceptable’: Congress slams detention of Wangchuk at Singhu border

    Rahul Gandhi attributed the responsibility for the detention to Prime Minister Narendra Modi….reports Asian Lite News

    The Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Tuesday criticised the Delhi Police’s detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk and his supporters at the Singhu border, describing it as “unacceptable.”

    “The detention of Sonam Wangchuk ji and hundreds of Ladakhis who were peacefully marching for environmental and constitutional rights is unacceptable,” Rahul Gandhi stated in a post on X.

    He attributed the responsibility for the detention to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

    “Why are elderly citizens being detained at Delhi’s border for standing up for Ladakh’s future? Modi ji, as with the farmers, this ‘Chakravyuh’ will be broken, and so will your arrogance. You will have to listen to Ladakh’s voice,” he added.

    Wangchuk and his supporters were detained by Delhi Police on late Monday night. Section 163 of the BNS has been imposed at the Delhi borders, Delhi Police announced.

    Wangchuk also shared news of his detention on the social media platform ‘X’.

    “I AM BEING DETAINED… along with 150 padyatris at Delhi Border, by a police force of hundreds, some say 1,000. Many elderly men & women in their 80s and a few dozen Army veterans… Our fate is unknown. We were on the most peaceful march to Bapu’s Samadhi… in the largest democracy in the world, the mother of democracy… Hai Ram!” Wangchuk posted.

    Wangchuk and other volunteers embarked on a foot march from Leh to New Delhi to urge the Centre to resume dialogue with Ladakh’s leadership regarding their demands.

    One of their key demands is for Ladakh to be included in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which would grant law-making powers to the local population to protect their land and cultural identity.

    The march began in Leh on September 1. Earlier, on reaching Himachal Pradesh on September 14, Wangchuk emphasised their mission’s purpose.

    “We are on a mission to remind the government of the promise it made to us five years ago,” he stated.

    Wangchuk has advocated for statehood, inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution–which grants special rights to tribal communities–and stronger ecological protections for Ladakh.

    Previously, Sonam Wangchuk completed a nine-day fast in Leh to draw the authorities’ attention to the importance of safeguarding Ladakh’s fragile mountain ecology and indigenous people.

    After the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir was split into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. (ANI)

    ALSO READ: Jaishankar, Blinken discuss West Asia, Ukraine

  • Shigeru Ishiba formally elected Japan’s PM

    Shigeru Ishiba formally elected Japan’s PM

    Ishiba emerged victorious in his fifth attempt at the LDP leadership, defeating Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi in a tightly contested runoff last week…reports Asian Lite News

    Shigeru Ishiba, the leader of Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), has been elected as the country’s next Prime Minister in a parliamentary vote on Tuesday. He will succeed Fumio Kishida.

    Both the lower and upper houses of the Japanese parliament endorsed Ishiba who won the LDP presidency last week. His confirmation sets the stage for a general election on October 27, despite opposition criticism over the timing of the polls, which caused a last-minute delay in Tuesday’s parliamentary vote.

    His leadership will be marked by challenges as Ishiba will have to work hard to restore the voter trust in the scandal-hit LDP, local media reported.

    Ishiba emerged victorious in his fifth attempt at the LDP leadership, defeating Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi in a tightly contested runoff last week. Ishiba garnered 215 votes, surpassing Takaichi’s 194.

    Earlier on Monday, Ishiba announced plans to dissolve the lower house of the parliament on October 9, with a General Election scheduled for October 27.

    His decision to call a snap election also drew a backlash from opposition parties, as they called it “disrespectful” and “unconstitutional” for him to make an announcement even before his election as the Prime Minister.

    Upon winning the LDP leadership, Ishiba committed himself to restoring trust and transparency within the party, emphasising the need for humility, fairness, and adherence to rules.

    His speech after the vote counting was grounded in the promise to make Japan a safer and more stable country. “I will dedicate myself to making Japan a safer country,” he declared, signalling his intent to prioritise national security in his administration.

    At a press conference following his victory, Ishiba stressed the importance of gaining the trust of the public and the need for accountability within the government.

    Earlier in the day, Kishida decided on the en masse resignation of his Cabinet.

    “Japan is facing a critical moment both at home and abroad. I sincerely hope that under the new Cabinet, important policies that will pave the way for Japan’s future will be vigorously implemented. I ask for your continued support for the next Cabinet and the new Prime Minister,” the outgoing PM said in a statement.

    ALSO READ: Choya: A High Quality Japanese Fruit Liqueur 

  • I’d have done better than Sunak in polls, says Truss

    I’d have done better than Sunak in polls, says Truss

    Truss called for the OBR, the government’s fiscal watchdog, to be abolished….reports Asian Lite News

    Liz Truss has said the Conservatives would have done better in July’s general election if she had stayed on as prime minister, during an often freewheeling one-off appearance at the Tory conference.

    Truss, who stepped down after 49 days in Downing Street, said that if she had had the support of her MPs and if the financial “establishment” had not undermined her 2022 mini-budget, she would have delivered lower taxes, more growth and low energy costs through fracking.

    Truss, who declined to back any of the four Tory leadership candidates, saying she preferred Argentina’s far-right president, Javier Milei, also refused to rule out trying to return to parliament, saying: “I’m not going to give up on this fight.”

    Asked during a fringe event Q&A if she thought a Tory party led by her rather than Rishi Sunak would have performed better in the general election, Truss replied: “Yes, I do.” She went on: “Because when I was in No 10, Reform was holding at 3% [in the polls]. By the time we got to the election, I think they got 18% because we promised change that we didn’t deliver.”

    Truss also blamed the rise of Reform for Labour winning her South West Norfolk constituency, saying she “didn’t believe the people of South West Norfolk actually consciously want a Labour MP”.

    She did, however, say it would have been “a very tall order” for her to have won the general election if she had stayed as PM, saying: “I think our best chance of winning would have been to have kept Boris.”

    Since leaving office, Truss has increasingly blamed the Bank of England, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and other officials for causing the extremely negative market reaction to the mini-budget, which offered £45bn of unfunded tax cuts.

    She said it was “complete economic illiteracy” to blame her. “When I got into government, taxes were ready at a 70-year high … the debt was going up,” she said. “I tried to turn that around, but the mini-budget was not implemented because organisations like the Bank of England sought to blame their mistakes on me, and the media, what you’d call the political class in Britain, went along with that narrative.”

    Truss called for the OBR, the government’s fiscal watchdog, to be abolished. “Conservatives won’t succeed until we get rid of the Office for Budget Responsibility,” she said.

    Claiming she had had a mandate to take on such institutions after Conservative members picked her over Sunak to replace Boris Johnson as prime minister, Truss said: “What I found was that those people and institutions were very powerful. They sought to undermine me, and at the same time people in the Conservative party wanted to buy into that narrative, but they are fundamentally wrong.”

    Asked about the four candidates vying to succeed Sunak now as party leader, Truss said they needed to be more radical, for example by looking at scrapping or amending the Human Rights Act and the Equality Act. She said candidates also needed to combat “the wokery marching for our institutions, the human rights culture embedded in government”.

    “So far, I haven’t seen any of the candidates really acknowledge how bad things are in the country as a whole, and frankly, for the Conservative party,” she said.

    Truss added: “I am a huge fan of Javier Milei. If Milei was standing in the Conservative leadership election, I would be backing him like a shot. On everything, he’s doing the right thing.”

    For the most part, the candidates have avoided much direct criticism of Truss. But on Monday, Robert Jenrick told ITV’s Peston show that her mini-budget “did great harm to our reputation for sound management of the public finances – it was cack-handed, it was careless and it was unconservative.”

    Asked why Truss still seemed popular with some party members, he replied: “She’s not a member of parliament any more and I think we have to move on from that.”

    ALSO READ: India, Kuwait discuss ways to advance bilateral trade

  • India’s ‘1st polling booth’ near LoC cries for help

    India’s ‘1st polling booth’ near LoC cries for help

    over 400 voters from Seemari village demand basic necessities such as better road access, free electricity, immediate healthcare services, increased ration supplies and mobile network…reports Asian Lite News

    A day ahead of third and final phase of Jammu and Kashmir Assembly elections, over 400 voters from Seemari village, home to India’s “first polling booth” along Line of Control (LoC), demand basic necessities such as better road access, free electricity, immediate healthcare services, increased ration supplies and mobile network.

    Residents are urging political parties and local authorities to address these urgent issues to improve their quality of life. They express concern that leaders forget about them after elections, noting that the only support they receive in times of need–whether for employment, food, medicine, or other essentials–comes from the Indian Army deployed along the LoC.

    In Seemari village, a total of 443 voters will participate, comprising 226 men and 217 women.

    Mohammad Sharif, a resident of the village, said, “This is Seemari village, the last one on the India-Pakistan border, and it has India’s first polling booth. We continue to vote, but we lack roads, hospitals, electricity, and stores. We have been facing many challenges. Voting is our right, and while we participate, the government needs to address our needs. Leaders come to seek our votes but often forget us after elections. Although the government support us, the funds rarely reach us; these funds seem to disappear along the way. Some leaders have visited and spoken with us, but they haven’t made any commitments to meet our demands.”

    Another local Ali Asgar said that the village lacks road facilities, and three nearby villages–Phagwan, Trutihaji, and Kadhama–also have no road connectivity.

    “When someone falls ill, they are carried on a cot to reach a nearby road to avail vehicle since it can’t access the area. The sick person has to pay Rs 1,500 for a reserved vehicle from the nearest road to get to the Tangdhar hospital. Although there is a clinic here, it has no medicine, and the roads are in poor condition. We spend over Rs 500 on electricity (monthly), but we only receive four hours of supply each day. During elections, we exercise our right to vote, yet we see no benefits from it. Leaders promise us roads and electricity, but nothing materializes. We receive a 5 kg ration on a monthly basis, which isn’t enough to last a month. This is the last remote village with over 400 voters, and we also lack a mobile network and job opportunities,” he said.

    Another resident of the Seemari village Naseer Awan added that leaders come here to seek votes and make numerous promises, but they don’t return for next five years after elections are over.

    “We have no way of knowing where they are in the meantime. The government does provide some support for our welfare, but we don’t receive everything we need. Living on the border of India and Pakistan, our only assistance comes from the Indian Army. We owe our survival to them; they provide employment and help our people during illnesses or emergencies,” he said.

    He asserted further that without the Army here, they would struggle to survive.

    “Although there is a hospital, it lacks medicine. We spend Rs 150 per person to travel to Tangdhar (19 km from Seemari) for medical treatment, which is difficult for us as we are very poor and often don’t even have Rs 10. We also face electricity issues and can’t pay our bills. If people in Delhi, where jobs are plentiful, can have free electricity, why can’t we? I urge the government to grant us free electricity. While the central government has good intentions, local leaders fail to deliver these essential services,” Nasir Awan, the resident of Seemari village said.

    On October 1, voters in 40 assembly constituencies across Jammu and Kashmir will participate in the third and final phase of the ongoing elections. Comprehensive arrangements have been made to ensure smooth and hassle-free voting.

    More than 3.9 million voters are eligible to participate in the final phase of the Assembly Elections across seven districts of the Union Territory, according to the Election Commission.

    In the Kashmir division, 16 assembly constituencies will vote, including Karnah, Kupwara, and Baramulla, while the Jammu division will see elections in 24 constituencies, such as Udhampur and Samba.

    A total of 5,060 polling stations will be set up across the districts of Kupwara, Baramulla, Bandipora, Udhampur, Samba, Kathua, and Jammu, with four election officials, including a presiding officer, assigned to each station. Over 20,000 polling staff will be deployed for this phase.

    Of the 3,918,220 eligible voters, there are 2,009,033 males, 1,909,130 females, and 57 voters identifying as third gender. Additionally, 194,000 youth aged 18-19, 35,860 persons with disabilities, and 32,953 elderly voters over 85 will also be casting their votes in this phase. (ANI)

    ALSO READ: Israel Launches ‘localised’ ground raids on Hezbollah targets