Categories
-Top News News Social Media

Musk’s X Banned in Brazil

Earlier, the Brazil Supreme Court gave X, owned by Elon Musk, a 24-hour deadline to designate a legal representative in the country, reports Asian Lite News

Brazil’s Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has ordered the social media platform X to be blocked nationwide after the company refused to appoint a legal representative in the country.

Earlier on Wednesday, de Moraes gave X, owned by Elon Musk, a 24-hour deadline to designate a representative. X shut down its Brazil office on August 17, claiming that there were threats to detain its former legal representative.

X had been in conflict with de Moraes for months over the platform’s refusal to comply with court orders to remove profiles that promote coup-related content or undermine democracy, Xinhua news agency reported.

On Friday, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) also ordered X to pay fines amounting to 18 million reais (about $3.2 million) for non-compliance.

The judge justified the block decision, citing the company’s repeated, willful defiance of court orders and refusal to pay daily fines, accusing X of attempting to bypass Brazil’s legal system and create a “lawless zone” on social media, especially in the lead-up to the 2024 municipal elections.

De Moraes added that X has facilitated “the actions of extremist groups and digital militias, enabling the spread of Nazi, racist, fascist, hateful, and anti-democratic speech”, particularly ahead of the upcoming elections.

The Brazilian judge also instructed the country’s National Telecommunications Agency (Anatel) to block access to X within 24 hours. Apple and Google have been given five days to remove the X app from their online stores.

Additionally, a daily fine of 50,000 reais (about $10,000) was imposed on any individual or company that uses methods such as VPNs to access X after the ban.

Categories
-Top News Social Media USA

Former Twitter Board Member Sues Musk’s X For $20M

Omid Kordestani claimed that Elon Musk refused to cash out more than $20 million worth of shares that belong to him, according to reports.

Billionaire Elon Musk-run X social media platform has been sued by a former Twitter board member for $20 million.

Omid Kordestani, former Twitter (now called X) executive chairman, has sued the social media platform, claiming that Musk refused to cash out more than $20 million worth of shares that belong to him, according to reports.

Reports further said that Kordestani had received most of his compensation in stock but after Musk bought the company, he allegedly refused to pay him for those shares, according to the lawsuit.

Musk or X were yet to comment on the lawsuit filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco.

Kordestani had joined Twitter’s board in 2015. He supervised the sale of the company to Musk in October 2022.

According to the lawsuit, X platform “seeks to reap the benefits of Kordestani’s seven years of service to Twitter without paying him for it”.

The Musk-run platform “refuses to meet those obligations, adding to a long list of unpaid bills accruing under Musk’s watch,” the lawsuit added.

Earlier, Parag Agrawal, former CEO of Twitter (now called X), and three other employees sued Elon Musk for about $128 million in unpaid severance. Agrawal, along with ex-chief financial officer Ned Segal, former Twitter head of legal and policy Vijaya Gadde and former Twitter General Counsel, Sean Edgett, filed the lawsuit.

The lawsuit claimed that the Tesla CEO showed “special ire” towards them by “publicly vowing to withhold their severance payments of around $200 million”, when he took over Twitter in 2022 for $44 billion.

According to earlier reports, the three top executives had an exit package of more than $100 million when they left the company.

ALSO READ: Musk shares fake news on punishment for rioters

Categories
-Top News Social Media USA

US DOJ Sues TikTok For Failing To Protect Children’s Privacy

The lawsuit alleges that TikTok violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by collecting personal information from users under 13 without parental consent, reports Asian Lite News

The US Justice Department filed a lawsuit against TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance on Friday, accusing them of failing to protect children’s privacy on the popular social media app, as reported by Nikkei Asia.

This lawsuit is part of the Biden administration’s ongoing effort to address concerns surrounding TikTok’s data practices and its implications for national security, Nikkei Asia reported.

The lawsuit alleges that TikTok violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by collecting personal information from users under 13 without parental consent. The Justice Department claims TikTok “knowingly permitted children to create regular TikTok accounts and collect and retain personal information from these users without parental consent,” according to Nikkei Asia.

Nikkei Asia further stated that TikTok, which has approximately 170 million users in the US, is facing additional pressure from a new law that would require ByteDance to divest TikTok’s US assets by January 19, 2025, or face a ban. This lawsuit adds to TikTok’s mounting legal troubles, reflecting heightened scrutiny of the platform’s data practices.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has joined the lawsuit, seeking penalties that could amount to billions of dollars if TikTok is found liable for the alleged privacy violations.

FTC Chair Lina Khan stated, “TikTok knowingly and repeatedly violated kids’ privacy, threatening the safety of millions of children across the country.”

Nikkei Asia noted that the FTC is pursuing penalties of up to USD 51,744 per violation per day, potentially totalling billions if TikTok is found liable.

TikTok has responded to the allegations by disputing the claims, arguing that many of the concerns relate to past practices that are either factually incorrect or have already been addressed. “We are proud of our efforts to protect children, and we will continue to update and improve the platform,” TikTok said in a statement.

The lawsuit follows reports from Reuters in 2020 that investigated TikTok’s compliance with a 2019 agreement aimed at protecting children’s data. The company has also faced fines from the European Union and the UK for similar issues.

In related legislative developments, the US Senate recently passed a bill extending COPPA to cover teenagers up to age 17, banning targeted advertising to minors, and allowing parents and children to delete their information from social media platforms. The bill now awaits approval from the Republican-controlled House, which is on recess until September. (ANI)

ALSO READ: US recognises González as the winner of Venezuela polls

Categories
-Top News Social Media USA

Musk Says Google Meddling With US Presidential Election

Elon Musk accused Google of interfering with the US Presidential election, warning they will face “a lot of trouble” if true.

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Monday attacked Sundar Pichai-run Google, saying if the search giant is interfering with the US Presidential election, they are going to face “a lot of trouble”.

Sharing a screenshot where a Google search on “president Donald” resulted in “president Donald Duck” and “president Donald Regan,” the tech billionaire asked if the tech giant has placed a search ban on the former US president and Republican presidential nominee.

“Wow, Google has a search ban on President Donald Trump! Election interference?” asked the X owner.

Musk further said Google is “getting themselves into a lot of trouble if they interfere with the election”.

An X user posted that “Google is owned by Democrats”.

Another Musk follower commented: “Elon, I’m sure they’ll claim you’re suppressing the Democrats, but my algorithm shows me both parties posting their thoughts and opinions. Under the previous management, anyone who didn’t share the same views as the left was limited or banned”.

However, some X users also slammed Musk, saying “You have a search ban on so many accounts you don’t like. What’s the difference?”

Meanwhile, the presidential race between Kamala Harris and Trump is incredibly close, according to a new media poll, revealing a surge in support for Harris among non-white voters and a significant rise in enthusiasm among Democrats for her campaign.

Trump maintains a slight lead, garnering 49 per cent of the vote compared to 47 per cent for Harris, according to the Wall Street Journal poll.

ALSO READ: Trump Pledges US Leadership in Crypto and Bitcoin

Categories
-Top News Social Media USA

‘WhatsApp now has 100 mn monthly active users in US’

Globally, the popular mobile messaging service has over 2 billion users….reports Asian Lite News

Meta-owned WhatsApp has reached 100 million users in the US, said its CEO Mark Zuckerberg. This is the first time the social media company has revealed its US figures for the WhatsApp service.

Meta also said that over 50 per cent of WhatsApp’s users own iPhones. Compared to the US, WhatsApp has with more than 500 million monthly active users in India.

Globally, the popular mobile messaging service has over 2 billion users. Earlier this month, WhatsApp rolled out a new feature that will help users stay safe in group messaging.

According to the company, this has already started rolling out to users and will be available to all users in the coming weeks. This includes who added you, how recent the group was created, and who created it. From there, you can decide whether to stay or leave the group and review some of the safety tools available to stay safe and secure on WhatsApp.

The platform is also reportedly working on a new feature to bring a ‘communities tab’ to iPad. It is also working on a new in-app dialler feature that will allow users to make calls directly from the app.

Elon Musk.(photo:IANS/Twitter)

Musk cries foul

Meanwhile, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk slammed Meta-owned WhatsApp for allegedly exporting users’ data every night. An X user posted that WhatsApp exports user data nightly, which is “analysed and used for targeted advertising, making users the product, not the customer”.

Musk replied that “WhatsApp exports your user data every night”. “Some people still think it is secure,” said the tech billionaire. Meta or WhatsApp were yet to comment on Musk’s allegation.

Computer programmer and video game developer, John Carmack, responded to Musk, saying is there any evidence that the content of messages is ever scanned or transmitted? “I assume usage patterns and routing metadata is collected, and if you invoke a bot in a conversation you are obviously opening it up, but I am still under the impression that the message contents are secure by default,” Carmack posted on X.

ALSO READ: Harris ‘ready’ to debate Trump

Categories
-Top News EU News Social Media

EU court says TikTok owner can’t avoid bloc’s law 

TikTok had argued that it wasn’t a gatekeeper but was playing the role of a new competitor in social media taking on entrenched players like Facebook and Instagram owner Meta…reports Asian Lite News

TikTok owner ByteDance can’t avoid the bloc’s crackdown on digital giants, a European Union court said Wednesday in a decision that found the video sharing platform falls under a new law that also covers Apple, Google and Microsoft.

The EU’s General Court rejected ByteDance’s legal challenge against being classed as an online “gatekeeper that has to comply with extra obligations under the 27-nation bloc’s Digital Markets Act.

The rulebook, also known as the DMA, took effect this year and seeks to counter the dominance of Big Tech companies and make online competition fairer by giving consumers more choice.

TikTok had argued that it wasn’t a gatekeeper but was playing the role of a new competitor in social media taking on entrenched players like Facebook and Instagram owner Meta.

The judges, however, decided that since 2018 TikTok had succeeded in increasing its number of users very rapidly and exponentially and that it had rapidly consolidated its position, and even strengthened that position over the following years.

We are disappointed with this decision,” the company said in a prepared statement. TikTok is a challenger platform that provides important competition to incumbent players. TikTok said it will evaluate its next steps and noted that it has already taken measures to comply with the DMA.

The Digital Markets Act took effect in March, with a list of dos and don’ts for big tech gatekeeper companies aimed at giving users more choices and threatening big penalties if they don’t comply.

The ruling can be appealed to the EU’s Court of Justice, the bloc’s highest court, but only on points of law.

ALSO READ-UK to host 45 European leaders for EPC meet

Categories
-Top News India News Social Media

PM Modi’s X followers cross a whopping 100 million

Interestingly, in the last three years, PM Modi’s X handle has seen an impressive growth of approximately 30 million users…reports Asian Lite News

Setting another benchmark, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has become the world’s most followed leader in office, on the social media platform ‘X’ with over 100 million followers.

While comparing the followers of various Indian politicians on X, PM Modi stands out significantly in terms of numbers.

The Leader of Opposition (LoP), Rahul Gandhi has 26.4 million followers, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has 27.5 million, Samajwadi Party’s Akhilesh Yadav has 19.9 million, and West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee has 7.4 million.

Rashtriya Janata Dal chief Lalu Prasad Yadav has 6.3 million, his son Tejashwi Yadav has 5.2 million followers, while NCP Chief Sharad Pawar has 2.9 million.

PM Modi is far ahead of other world leaders including US President Joe Biden, who currently has 38.1 million followers, HH Sheikh Mohammed, the present ruler of Dubai (11.2 million) and Pope Francis (18.5 million).

PM Modi even has more followers when compared to some active global athletes including Virat Kohli (64.1 million), Brazilian footballer Neymar Jr (63.6 million) and American basketball player LeBron James (52.9 million) followers. He is ahead of celebrities like Taylor Swift (95.3 million), Lady Gaga (83.1 million), and Kim Kardashian (75.2 million).

Interestingly, in the last three years, PM Modi’s X handle has seen an impressive growth of approximately 30 million users.

His influence extends to YouTube and Instagram as well, where he has nearly 25 million subscribers and over 91 million followers respectively.

Since joining the platform in 2009, PM Modi has consistently used it for constructive engagement. He maintains an active and engaging persona, follows numerous common citizens, interacts with them, replies to their messages, and has never blocked anyone. PM Modi has always used this platform organically, without ever resorting to paid promotions or bots.

With a blend of insightful and engaging posts on X, the PM has captivated millions around the globe. (ANI)

ALSO READ-PM Modi Condemns Attack on Trump

Categories
-Top News EU News Social Media

Musk’s X ‘deceives’ users with blue checks, EU charges

Musk’s plans for X have put him at odds with Brussels since the EU wants big tech to do more to protect users online and increase competition in the digital sphere…reports Asian Lite News

Tech billionaire Elon Musk’s X platform is misleading users with its blue checkmarks for certified accounts, and is also violating EU content rules, Brussels said Friday, in a finding that could lead to hefty fines.

EU regulators are unhappy with the blue badge system under Musk’s ownership since anyone can now obtain it with a premium subscription, whereas before it was reserved for verified accounts including leaders, companies and journalists, after approval.

The formal warning against X is the first under the Digital Services Act (DSA), a sweeping law that forces digital companies do more to police content online. It follows a probe launched in December 2023.

X becomes the third company in as many weeks to face the European Union’s wrath for violating landmark new rules, after Brussels warned Apple and Meta to change their ways or risk massive fines — for breaches of a second law known as the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

Musk has overhauled the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, including changing its name, since purchasing it in October 2022.

But his plans for X have put him at odds with Brussels since the EU wants big tech to do more to protect users online and increase competition in the digital sphere.

Now the European Commission has told X of its preliminary view that it is “in breach of” the DSA, arguing that the social network “deceives” users with its new blue badge rules.

“Since anyone can subscribe to obtain such a ‘verified’ status, it negatively affects users’ ability to make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of the accounts and the content they interact with,” the commission said in a statement.

“There is evidence of motivated malicious actors abusing the ‘verified account’ to deceive users,” it added.

The commission also accused X of failing to comply with rules on advertising transparency — since it does “not provide a searchable and reliable” ad database — and failing to give researchers access to public data.

“X has now the right of defense — but if our view is confirmed we will impose fines and require significant changes,” the EU’s top digital official, Thierry Breton, said.

Fines under the DSA can go as high as six percent of a company’s total worldwide annual turnover and force it to make changes to address violations.

X will be able to examine the EU’s file and defend itself against Friday’s finding.

There is no time limit on how long an investigation may last.

EU regulators’ wide-ranging probe into X also continues to look into the spread of illegal content and the effectiveness of the platform’s efforts to combat disinformation, the commission said.

Under the DSA, X is one of 25 “very large” online platforms, including Facebook and TikTok, with more than 45 million monthly active users in the 27-country EU.

X is also in the EU’s crosshairs for a cut to content moderation resources. In May, the EU told X to hand over “detailed information and internal documents” and demanded more information about steps taken to mitigate risks from generative AI on elections.

There are currently other investigations under the DSA into Meta’s Facebook and Instagram as well as TikTok and AliExpress.

The DSA and the DMA are both part of the EU’s bolstered legal armory targeting big tech and EU regulators have stepped up enforcement of the laws since they came into force.

ALSO READ-Musk drops lawsuit against OpenAI

Categories
Lite Blogs Social Media

Social Media Doesn’t Raise Depression Risk in All Teens

They stressed individualised approaches to determine the benefits and harms of social media on young people’s mental health…reports Asian Lite News

Social media use does not raise the risk of depression in all adolescents, revealed a study on Wednesday which found parental hostility and peer bullying as major risk factors driving teenagers to mental health conditions.

Early social media use has previously been linked with an increased risk of depression among teenagers and young adults.

The findings, published in the Journal of Adolescence, suggest that social media use does not impact all adolescents in the same way.

Researchers from Brigham Young University in the US found certain factors may make social media more risky or protective regarding depression.

These include greater parental hostility, peer bullying, anxiety, reactivity to stressors, and lower parental media monitoring.

“If the teenager is already in a vulnerable position (being bullied or having hostile parents or parents who don’t monitor their teenager’s media), then social media is much more likely to be harmful,” said corresponding author W. Justin Dyer, from the varsity.

Dyer said, “This is especially true if there is more than 3 hours of use a day.”

On the contrary, warm and supportive friends and parents and “moderate amounts of social media use (less than 3 hours a day) may be a good thing.”

They stressed individualised approaches to determine the benefits and harms of social media on young people’s mental health.

Dyer noted that adolescents can greatly benefit if parents guide them “as they navigate social media. That guidance may make all the difference.”

The study is based on 488 adolescents living in the US who were surveyed once a year for 8 years (beginning in 2010 when the average age for participants was 13 years old).

ALSO READ-Economic cost of mental illness

Categories
-Top News Social Media USA

New York bill blocks algorithmic social media posts for kids

This legislation is the initial step in what is expected to be a lengthy rule-making process and a probable legal challenge from social media companies….reports Asian Lite News

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a bill on Thursday allowing parents to block their children from seeing social media posts suggested by algorithms, aiming to limit feeds critics say are addictive, media reported.

Under the new legislation, apps like TikTok and Instagram would restrict feeds for users under 18 to posts from accounts they follow, rather than algorithm-suggested content, according to Associated Press report.

The bill also prevents platforms from sending notifications about suggested posts to minors between midnight and 6 a.m. Both restrictions can be lifted with what the bill calls “verifiable parental consent.”

The law will not take effect immediately. State Attorney General Letitia James will develop rules for verifying users’ ages and parental consent. Once the rules are finalized, social media companies will have 180 days to comply.

“We can protect our kids. We can tell the companies that you are not allowed to do this… parents should have a say over their children’s lives and their health, not you,” Hochul was quoted as saying at the signing ceremony in Manhattan.

This legislation is the initial step in what is expected to be a lengthy rule-making process and a probable legal challenge from social media companies.

NetChoice, a tech industry trade group including X and Meta, criticized the bill as unconstitutional. “This is an assault on free speech and the open internet by the State of New York,” said Carl Szabo, vice president and general counsel of NetChoice. He argued that the law would force websites to censor content unless visitors provide ID to verify their age, enabling the government to track online activity.

Most major social media platforms use algorithms to send users a continuous stream of suggested content, curated based on previous interactions and the interests of similar users. The bill is New York’s latest attempt to regulate social media amid concerns about children’s interactions with these platforms.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom also announced plans to collaborate with the Legislature on a bill restricting smartphone usage for students during school hours, although details of the proposal are yet to be provided, it was reported..

In 2019, Newsom signed a bill permitting school districts to limit or ban smartphones in schools.

ALSO READ: TikTok’s legal fight intensifies with U.S. govt