Categories
-Top News Sport UK News

Amnesty slams French hijab sports ban

France is the only European country to enforce a ban on headscarves in sport, which also contradicts the rules of international sports bodies such as FIFA, the International Basketball Federation and the International Volleyball Federation…reports Asian Lite News

Amnesty International has accused France of breaking international human rights law by enforcing a ban on women competing at this summer’s Olympic Games in Paris wearing headscarves.

In a report on the ban published on Tuesday, Amnesty also accused the International Olympic Committee of weakness by not challenging France’s “discriminatory” law.

Anna Blus, Amnesty’s women’s rights researcher in Europe, said: “Banning French athletes from competing with sports hijabs at the Olympic and Paralympic Games makes a mockery of claims that Paris 2024 is the first ‘Gender Equal Olympics’ and lays bare the racist gender discrimination that underpins access to sport in France.”

She added: “Discriminatory rules policing what women wear are a violation of Muslim women’s and girls’ human rights and have a devastating impact on their participation in sport, blocking efforts to make sports more inclusive and more accessible.”

The report details how bans on wearing headscarves in multiple sports in France, justified domestically on grounds of secularism but which is not accepted in international law, have created a situation where the Olympic host is in breach of the IOC’s own human rights rules as well as numerous human rights obligations and treaties to which France is a party.

The IOC has failed to call on France to overturn bans on headscarves at the Olympics and in other sports, claiming in a letter earlier this year that French law was outside the committee’s remit, and that “freedom of religion is interpreted in many different ways by different states.”

France is the only European country to enforce a ban on headscarves in sport, which also contradicts the rules of international sports bodies such as FIFA, the International Basketball Federation and the International Volleyball Federation.

Basketball player Helene Ba told Amnesty that the French ban “is a clear violation of the Olympic charter, values and provisions, and an infringement on our fundamental rights and freedoms … I think it’s going to be a shameful moment for France.”

She added: “Mentally it is also hard because you really feel excluded … especially if you go to the bench and the referee tells you to go to the ladders (stands). Everyone sees you … It’s a walk of shame.”

Another female athlete told Amnesty anonymously: “It is sad. It’s even shameful to be at this point in 2024, to block dreams just because of a piece of fabric.”

In a press release, Amnesty said: “For several years, French authorities have been weaponizing these concepts (of secularism) to justify the enactment of laws and policies that disproportionately impact Muslim women and girls. And all of this is occurring against a backdrop relentless, twenty-year campaign of harmful lawmaking and regulation of Muslim women’s and girls’ clothing in France, fueled by prejudice, racism and gendered Islamophobia.”

ALSO READ-Amnesty calls on Taliban to reopen secondary schools for girls

Categories
-Top News Asia News Bangladesh

Authorities must end ‘relentless smear campaign’ of Nobel laureate

The speed at which Yunus’s trial is proceeding contrasts sharply with other labour rights-related court cases in Bangladesh…reports Asian Lite News

Amnesty International has issued a statement condemning the alleged weaponization of labour laws by authorities in Bangladesh against Nobel Peace laureate Mohammad Yunus. More than 150 cases have reportedly been lodged against the 83-year-old Nobel laureate and other associates in a move widely perceived as harassment and intimidation.

Background

Mohammad Yunus, renowned for his groundbreaking work in microfinance and social entrepreneurship, is also the Chairman of the board at Grameen Telecom. He is currently facing criminal charges in Bangladesh under the Labour Act of 2006, alongside three other board members: Ashraful Hasan, Nur Jahan Begum, and Mohammad Shahjahan. The charges relate to employment-related violations.

The ongoing trial is part of a larger pattern of legal action initiated against Yunus since the ruling Awami League party came to power in 2008. Amnesty International asserts that these criminal proceedings, which pertain to civil and administrative matters, constitute an abuse of labour laws and the justice system and are perceived as a form of political retaliation against Yunus for his work and dissent.

Prof Muhammad Yunus also recipient of the US Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Congressional Gold Medal

Amnesty International’s Response

Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International, strongly condemned the situation, stating, “Mohammad Yunus’s case is emblematic of the beleaguered state of human rights in Bangladesh, where the authorities have eroded freedoms and bulldozed critics into submission.”

She further expressed concern about the government’s actions, saying, “The abuse of laws and misuse of the justice system to settle vendettas is inconsistent and incompatible with international human rights treaties.”

Callamard called on the Bangladeshi authorities to shift their focus to more pressing labour rights issues, such as addressing unsafe factories responsible for the loss of numerous workers’ lives in Bangladesh. She emphasized that it’s time for the government to put an end to this perceived travesty of justice.

Political Context

The statement also highlighted that Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has publicly criticized Yunus on multiple occasions, including accusing him of exploiting the poor. The Prime Minister’s remarks have further fueled concerns of political motivation behind Yunus’s legal troubles.

Labour Rights Cases

The speed at which Yunus’s trial is proceeding contrasts sharply with other labour rights-related court cases in Bangladesh. Recent incidents, such as factory fires in 2021 and 2022 resulting in numerous fatalities due to alleged negligence and safety standard violations, have not seen company owners held criminally liable. Occupational safety concerns persist in Bangladesh, with a high number of worker deaths reported by NGOs working to improve working conditions.

Targeted Harassment

Notably, the case only names the three directors closely associated with Yunus, and Grameen Telecom itself is not mentioned. This has led to suggestions that the case may be politically motivated and intended to harass and intimidate Yunus and his colleagues.

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate

Mohammad Yunus and Grameen Bank were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for their pioneering work in promoting economic and social development through microfinance. Yunus also established Grameen Telecom in 1994 to extend information technology access to rural populations in Bangladesh.

International Concern

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights expressed concern about the harassment and intimidation of Mohammad Yunus and other dissenting voices in Bangladesh on September 5, 2023.

Amnesty International’s statement underscores the international concern over the alleged misuse of legal mechanisms to target individuals and silence dissent in Bangladesh.

ALSO READ-Bangladesh disappointed by European Parliament’s resolution