Categories
-Top News UK News

Huw named as BBC presenter at centre of new row

Welsh journalist Edwards, 61, is one of the most recognisable faces on UK television…reports Asian Lite News

Veteran news anchor Huw Edwards was on Wednesday revealed by his wife as the BBC presenter accused of paying for explicit images but police said no criminal offence had been committed.

The furore has been front-page news and leading radio and television news bulletins in British media for six successive days.

It comes after the publicly funded BBC — whose brand is built on public trust — was rocked in recent years by scandals which saw some of their biggest names revealed as serial sex offenders.

But while traditional media outlets — bound by strict privacy and defamation laws — did not name the presenter, there was frenzied speculation on social media as to who it was.

Confirming his identity, Edwards’ wife Vicky Flind said her husband was “suffering from serious mental health issues” and was now “receiving in-patient hospital care where he will stay for the foreseeable future”.

London’s Metropolitan Police said there was “no information to indicate that a criminal offence has been committed” after examining information received. South Wales Police said the same.

Welsh journalist Edwards, 61, is one of the most recognisable faces on UK television, and was the man entrusted with telling the world that Queen Elizabeth II had died.

The BBC has been under the spotlight since allegations emerged last week in The Sun newspaper from the parents of a young adult, who said that the presenter had paid for explicit images of their child.

The young adult, however, called the claims “rubbish”.

The Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid newspaper, a longtime critic of the BBC and a supporter of the ruling Conservative party, accused the corporation of failing to properly investigate the claims.

Edward’s wife said she was revealing his identity “after what have been five extremely difficult days for our family” and was doing so “primarily out of concern for his mental well-being and to protect our children”.

“Once well enough to do so, he intends to respond to the stories that have been published,” she added in a statement, saying that he only learned of the allegations on Thursday.

Media experts warned that attention could soon switch to The Sun after the police statement threw serious doubt on the parents’ claims of criminality.

“The question mark here is around the specific allegation made” of criminality, said media lawyer Matthew Gill of Howard Kennedy LLP.

“Now, it’s unclear from The Sun’s reporting whether they had any concrete evidence,” he added, warning they could potentially face a defamation suit.

A spokesperson for The Sun said the newspaper “has no plans to publish further allegations” and would cooperate with the BBC’s own internal inquiry in the matter.

But they added: “We must also re-emphasise that The Sun at no point in our original story alleged criminality and also took the decision neither to name Mr Edwards nor the young person involved in the allegations.

“Suggestions about possible criminality were first made at a later date by other media outlets, including the BBC.”

The newspaper’s reporting from the outset was about a complaint from the individual’s parents to the BBC about payments from the presenter that fuelled a drug habit, the spokesperson maintained.

Murdoch and the BBC have a long history of friction, with media industry publication Press Gazette calling the current claim and counter-claim “a war between two of the UK’s leading news publishers”.

“This episode can now only result with either News UK-owned The Sun or the BBC having their credibility severely diminished,” it added.

The first claims emerged in an article published Friday, in which the parents said the presenter had paid a total of £35,000 ($45,000) for the pictures.

The family said their child had used the money to fuel a crack cocaine addiction, prompting lawyers acting for the young person to deny the claims.

Three more people have since come forward with complaints, including that Edwards sent threatening and inappropriate messages, and allegedly broke Covid lockdown rules.

The softly-spoken, proud Welshman began delivering the nightly news to millions in 1994, and has either anchored or commentated on the UK’s most tumultuous events since then.

The 61-year-old presenter fronted the national broadcaster’s “Six O’Clock News” between 1994 and 2003, when it was the most-watched news programme in the UK.

His authoritative tones are most readily associated with some of the biggest events in the country’s recent political, social and royal history.

“I don’t think of myself as a severe person, but the job lends itself to seriousness,” he told the Radio Times of his sombre demeanour.

“I often turn up for events and one of the first things people say with surprise is that I have a good sense of humour.”

He led the BBC commentary team at the opening and closing ceremonies of the 2012 Olympics in London.

He also presented coverage of the 2011 wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton, which was watched by a peak domestic audience of 20 million viewers.

ALSO READ-BBC suspends well-known presenter

Categories
-Top News UK News

BBC suspends well-known presenter

London’s Metropolitan Police released a statement later on Sunday confirming the BBC contacted it over the matter, “but no formal referral or allegation has been made”…reports Asian Lite News

The BBC was forced to contact the authorities and suspended a top staffer following a newspaper expose that he had allegedly paid £35,000 ($45,000) to a teenager for sexually explicit photos. BBC has come under fire for not taking action earlier despite receiving a complaint from the teenager’s mother in May this year.

The Sun newspaper, which first broke the story, cited the young person’s mother as saying that an unnamed BBC presenter paid her child more than £35,000 ($45,000) for the images over a three-year period.

It is also claimed that BBC’s star presenter in question appeared on air for a month after the family of the young person — who was said to be 17 when the payments started — complained to the BBC in May. In a statement, the BBC confirmed that it “first became aware of a complaint in May”.

“New allegations were put to us on Thursday of a different nature and in addition to our own enquiries we have also been in touch with external authorities, in line with our protocols,” it added.

The statement said that “a male member of staff has been suspended”.

“This is a complex and fast moving set of circumstances and the BBC is working as quickly as possible to establish the facts in order to properly inform appropriate next steps,” the BBC added.

The alleged recipient’s mother said they had used the cash to fund a crack habit. The Sun reported the mother as saying : “When I see him on telly, I feel sick. I blame this BBC man for destroying my child’s life. Taking my child’s innocence and handing over the money for crack cocaine that could kill my child.”

Culture minister Lucy Frazer said earlier she had spoken about the “deeply concerning” allegations with BBC Director General Tim Davie, who assured her the BBC is “investigating swiftly and sensitively,” according to an AFP report.

London’s Metropolitan Police released a statement later on Sunday confirming the BBC contacted it over the matter, “but no formal referral or allegation has been made”.

“We will require additional information before determining what further action should follow,” it added.

After The Sun exposed the scam, some embarrassed BBC presenters have taken to social media to deny that they are the broadcaster in question.

BBC was earlier rocked by a scam when its chairman resigned in April after an inquiry found he failed to disclose a loan to ex-prime minister Boris Johnson, has come under fire over its handling of the claim.

Former home secretary and an MP from the ruling Conservative party, Priti Patel, has said the BBC’s response was “derisory.”

“The BBC, but also other broadcasters, do need to get a grip because we seem to lurch from one scandal to another and more needs to be done,” opposition Labour party lawmaker Rachel Reeves told Sky News.

ALSO READ-Musk dubs BBC as govt-funded media

Categories
-Top News UK News World News

Musk dubs BBC as govt-funded media

Musk earlier labelled American NPR network as “state-affiliated media”, erupting a controversy….reports Asian Lite News

Twitter CEO Elon Musk has labelled the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) as a “government-funded media” organisation, as the broadcaster reached out to the micro-blogging platform for clarification.

After labelling the @BBC account — which has 2.2 million followers — Musk tweeted on Monday: “What does BBC stand for again? I keep forgetting.”

“We need to add more granularity to editorial influence, as it varies greatly. I don’t actually think the BBC is as biased as some other government-funded media, but it is silly of the BBC to claim zero influence,” the Twitter CEO posted.

“Minor government influence in their case would be accurate,” he added.

However, Twitter has not labelled the BBC’s other accounts like BBC News (World) and BBC Breaking News.

The BBC said in a statement: “We are speaking to Twitter to resolve this issue as soon as possible. The BBC is and always has been, independent. We are funded by the British public through the licence fee.”

According to Musk, “I do actually follow the BBC” as “they have some great material.”

Musk earlier labelled American NPR network as “state-affiliated media”, erupting a controversy.

Following the backlash from NPR, it changed it to “government-funded media”, reported CNN.

NPR receives some funding from public institutions but the vast majority comes from sources such as corporate sponsorships and NPR membership fees.

ALSO READ: Is China afraid of Musk?

Categories
-Top News UK News

BBC tells staff to delete TikTok

The broadcaster has launched multiple pages on the app as it attempts to reach new audiences, and its official account has 4.4 million followers…reports Asian Lite News

The BBC said that it had told staff to delete Chinese-owned video app TikTok unless it was needed for business reasons, with Western institutions increasingly taking a harder stance over data collection fears.

The British broadcasting giant reported that it sent staff a message on Sunday saying: “We don’t recommend installing TikTok on a BBC corporate device unless there is a justified business reason.

“If you do not need TikTok for business reasons, TikTok should be deleted,” it added.

Western authorities have been taking an increasingly firm approach to the app, owned by the firm ByteDance, citing fears that user data could be used or abused by Chinese officials.

The UK on Thursday announced a security ban on TikTok on government devices, in line with action by the European Union and the United States.

The BBC told AFP on Monday that it “takes the safety and security of our systems, data and people incredibly seriously”.

It added that while usage of TikTok on its corporate devices is still permitted for editorial and marketing purposes, “we will continue to monitor and assess the situation”.

The broadcaster has launched multiple pages on the app as it attempts to reach new audiences, and its official account has 4.4 million followers.

ByteDance has long insisted that it does not keep data in China or share it with Beijing.

Chinese-owned video hosting service TikTok can threaten America’s safety and its national security, the White House had said last week.

Responding to a media query over the TikTok ban during a press briefing, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, “We have expressed concerns over China’s potential use of software platforms that could endanger or threaten America’s safety and national security so that is the President concerned that is why we have called on Congress to take action.” “We have seen a bipartisan piece of legislation that you know and have been covering, which is the President’s main priority. I am sure when it comes to their safety when it comes to their security and when it comes to our national security, those things are protected and so that has been the President’s focus over the last couple of years,” she added.

In the press briefing, the White House press secretary further stated that Sophia, who is reviewing this particular software and the TikTok app, supports the bipartisan legislation mentioned earlier.

“Look the bottom line is that when it comes to potential threats to our national security, the safety of Americans, privacy, we are going to speak out and we are going to be very clear about that and the Prez has been last 2 years and so we are asking Congress to act, to move forward with this bipartisan legislation that was the strict action that we just mentioned and we are going to continue to do so,” Pierre said.

This statement from the White House Press Secretary came after the group of Senators introduced the “Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology” (RESTRICT) Act.

The Act would give new powers to the US government to take action against technologies posing risk to the country.

ALSO READ-BBC presenters refuse to work in show of solidarity with anchor

Categories
-Top News London News

BBC presenters refuse to work in show of solidarity with anchor

Critics of Lineker’s suspension say the BBC bowed to government pressure, leading to a furious debate about the impartiality of the national broadcaster…reports Asian Lite News

BBC faced a mounting crisis as a row over football presenter Gary Lineker’s criticism of government migration policy led to a presenter mutiny, drew a comment from the prime minister and left the broadcaster’s boss defending his position.

The BBC was forced to axe much of its sports coverage on Saturday as presenters refused to work in a show of solidarity with Lineker, after the BBC sought to defend its impartiality by taking him off the air due to his comments on social media.

Lineker, a former England soccer captain, the BBC’s highest-paid presenter and the anchor of the football highlights programme “Match of the Day”, was suspended from his role following his criticism of Britain’s migration policy.

Critics of Lineker’s suspension say the BBC bowed to government pressure, leading to a furious debate about the impartiality of the national broadcaster.

BBC Director General Tim Davie told the BBC on Saturday he had no intention of resigning over the matter. “We in the BBC, and myself, are absolutely driven by a passion for impartiality, not left, right or pandering to a particular party,” he said.

Davie said he wanted Lineker back on the air and hoped to find a balance which enabled some presenters to express opinions while at the same time maintaining the BBC’s neutrality.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak issued a statement on Saturday defending the migration policy, which bars the entry of asylum seekers arriving in small boats across the English Channel, saying he hoped Lineker and the BBC could resolve their differences in a timely manner.

“It is rightly a matter for them, not the government,” Sunak said.

The Lineker row severely disrupted the BBC’s sports programming on Saturday as multiple presenters walked out, prompting it to issue an apology.

Saturday’s edition of “Match of the Day”, presented by Lineker for more than 20 years, aired at the usual time despite his absence, but was slashed to just 20 minutes and aired as a show of highlights without commentary.

The BBC is committed to being politically impartial, but has faced criticism from the Conservative and Labour parties about how neutral it actually is, particularly in the era of social media when high-profile presenters can easily make their personal positions known.

The opposition Labour Party and media commentators accuse the BBC of silencing Lineker, after Sunak’s spokeswoman called Lineker’s comments “unacceptable” and interior minister Suella Braverman said they were “offensive”.

“The BBC is not acting impartially by caving in to Tory MPs who are complaining about Gary Lineker,” Labour leader Keir Starmer told reporters at a conference in Wales on Saturday.

Lineker declined to comment to media as he left his London home on Saturday and did not reply to questions from reporters on arrival at the King Power Stadium in Leicester where he went to watch one of his former clubs play.

The furore followed Sunak’s announcement of the new law earlier in the week. Lineker, 62, took to Twitter to describe the legislation as a “cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s.”

Seeking to resolve the dispute, the BBC said there needed to be an agreed position on Lineker’s use of social media before he can return to presenting. But critics of Lineker’s suspension say he is entitled to his personal opinions because he is not a news presenter.

Greg Dyke, who was director-general of the BBC between 2000 and 2004, told BBC radio earlier on Saturday that the BBC had made a mistake.

“The perception out there is going to be that Gary Lineker, a much-loved television presenter, was taken off air after government pressure on a particular issue,” Dyke said.

That could turn viewers away from the 100-year-old BBC, which is funded by a 159 pound ($192) annual “licence fee” tax on all television-watching households.

ALSO READ-BBC, Tories Wither As Team Lineker Flexes Muscles

Categories
-Top News Politics UK News

BBC, Tories Wither As Team Lineker Flexes Muscles

The controversy cast a shadow over a migration agreement between Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and French President Emmanuel Macron, with the BBC being accused of caving to political pressure.

BBC has suspended the former England football captain Gary Lineker after a controversy around his comments on UK’s migration policy caused a rift between the UK government and the prominent presenter.

On Friday, the BBC stated that there must be an agreed-upon position regarding his use of social media before he can resume his duties. According to BBC Director General Tim Davie, the decision was a “proportionate action.”

The controversy cast a shadow over a migration agreement between Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and French President Emmanuel Macron, with the BBC being accused of caving to political pressure.

The opposition Labour party criticised the BBC’s move, claiming that “Gary Lineker off-air is an assault on free speech in the face of political pressure.”

Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon also denounced the BBC’s decision as “indefensible.” The Department for Culture, Media and Sport stated that “Individual cases are a matter for the BBC.”

In yet another development, while the BBC attempted to find a replacement host for Match of the Day, Ian Wright and Alan Shearer announced they were pulling out of the show in solidarity, the Guardian reported.

With the BBC struggling to find presenters, pundits or commentators for Match of the Day, it was announced the show would go ahead with only the match highlights being shown, it was reported.

Meanwhile, two more presenters have withdrawn from their shows. Alex Scott announced on Saturday morning that she has stepped down from presenting Football Focus, and shortly after, Jason Mohammad, the presenter of Final Score, followed suit. The BBC has replaced both of these shows on their TV schedule.

Meanwhile, former BBC director general Greg Dyke has said the BBC has undermined its own credibility with its decision to stand Gary Lineker down because it will be viewed as having bowed to government pressure, Guardian reported.

Earlier this week, the UK government has announced details of a new law that would prevent migrants arriving in small boats across the Channel from claiming asylum and deport them back to their homeland or to so-called safe third countries.

The law has drawn widespread criticism from opposition parties, charities, and the United Nations refugee agency for its impact on genuine refugees seeking asylum.

Lineker, who has previously hosted refugees in his home, retweeted a post featuring a video of Home Secretary Suella Braverman discussing the law. He commented on the tweet: “Good heavens, this is beyond awful.”

He also said the policy is “immeasurably cruel” and directed at vulnerable individuals, with language reminiscent of the 1930s Germany.

The controversy has raised questions about the British government’s approach to immigration policy, the rights of refugees, and the impact of such policies on vulnerable individuals.

ALSO READ: EU warns UK asylum plan

Categories
-Top News UK News

‘BBC Chair made’errors of judgement in Boris loan affair’

Sharp, ‘Variety’ notes, appeared before a parliamentary inquiry convened by the DCMS Committee on February 7 and said: “I’ve never given the (former) Prime Minister advice. He’s never sought it. I know nothing about his personal financial affairs.”..reports Asian Lite News

BBC chair Richard Sharp made “significant errors of judgement” when he did not declare his role in the facilitation of a loan in 2020 to the then Prime Minister Boris Johnson, a UK parliamentary inquiry has found, according to ‘Variety’.

Sharp, a banker and former chair of the Royal Academy of Arts, was appointed in January 2021 on the recommendation of Oliver Dowden, then Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) secretary, and Boris Johnson, who was still Prime Minister at the time, ‘Variety reports’.

A report in ‘The Sunday Times’ in January alleged that Johnson put forward the recommendation just weeks after Sharp “helped to arrange a guarantee on a loan of up to 800,000 Pounds [$990,000 ]” for Johnson.

According to ‘The Sunday Times’, Sharp was drawn into Johnson’s finances while dining with the then prime minister and businessman Sam Blyth, a friend and “distant cousin” of Johnson’s. The report stated that Blyth had agreed to act as a guarantor for the loan and wanted Sharp’s “advice on the best way forward”.

Sharp, ‘Variety’ notes, appeared before a parliamentary inquiry convened by the DCMS Committee on February 7 and said: “I’ve never given the (former) Prime Minister advice. He’s never sought it. I know nothing about his personal financial affairs.”

The committee, which also interviewed Sharp prior to his appointment as BBC chair, established that Sharp had effected an introduction of Blyth to Cabinet Secretary Simon Case and repeatedly asked him why he didn’t disclose the matter during the interview. Sharp, in turn, repeatedly said that he was following “due process”.

The committee report, which was published on Sunday and is quoted by ‘Variety’, pointed out: “Richard Sharp’s decisions, firstly to become involved in the facilitation of a loan to the then Prime Minister while at the same time applying for a job that was in that same person’s gift, and then to fail to disclose this material relationship, were significant errors of judgement, which undermine confidence in the public appointments process and could deter qualified individuals from applying for such posts.”

The report added, according to ‘Variety’: “Mr Sharp’s failure to disclose his actions to the panel and the committee, although he believed this to be completely proper, constitute a breach of the standards expected of individuals applying for such public appointments…. Mr Sharp should consider the impact his omissions will have on trust in him, the BBC and the public appointments process.”

ALSO READ-Sikhs at risk of being banned from UK courts

Categories
-Top News UK News

BBC controversially scraps ‘Dateline London’

In China, where the BBC is available only in foreigners’ residences and selected hotels, the state censor would blackout the transmission every time anything uncomplimentary was said about the People’s Republic…reports Asian Lite News

The BBC has given a controversial burial to one of its popular current affairs programmes – ‘Dateline London’ – after its remarkable 25-year run.

The decision has disappointed many within and outside Britain, for the weekend half-hour programme, which discussed subjects of international interest and was aired on both domestic and world services of the BBC, commanded a viewership of 12-15 million, according to its executive producer Nick Guthrie. It was also reportedly quite inexpensive to produce.

A significant section of Dateline’s audience was in India, ranging from Indian diplomats to influential folks who regard the BBC to be a credible source information.

In China, where the BBC is available only in foreigners’ residences and selected hotels, the state censor would blackout the transmission every time anything uncomplimentary was said about the People’s Republic.

In a ‘goodbye speech’ at a Dateline farewell party, Guthrie, a BBC veteran since 1968, hinted the broadcaster’s management had succumbed to pressure from the British government by scrapping the programme.

He said: “Just because a particular group, government, lobby groups, whatever, object to views expressed by others does not mean the BBC has to kow-tow. All the more important it has to stand up robustly for freedom of speech.”

Since the premiership of Margaret Thatcher, the BBC, a public broadcaster under a Royal Charter, has often been under pressure when a pro-private sector Conservative party is in power. This was most acutely felt when Boris Johnson was recently the Prime Minister. His government threatened cuts to the organisation’s funding, which come from licence fees from UK households.

Dateline, with a panel of mostly foreign correspondents stationed in London, reflected independent views, with no restrictions on fair criticism of authorities, including the British establishment.

In anticipation of cuts, the BBC embarked on an economy drive, including merging channels.

A spokesperson for the BBC stated: “As a 24-hour news channel (referring to the domestic service, which was one of platforms premiering and repeating Dateline), we are constantly reviewing our output and exploring how our schedules can best deliver news content that is valuable and relevant to viewers.”

She went on to say: “As the channel’s output has evolved, we now have a number of programmes that offer a similar experience to our audience, from ‘The Context’ with Christian Fraser to ‘Unspun World’ with John Simpson.”

Guthrie mentioned in his speech: “I am concerned the BBC has decided to merge News 24 with World TV. I am sad they could not find a spot for Dateline on the new channel. As I find BBC people talking to BBC people (however brilliant they are), no substitute for lively discussion between outside experts and opinion makers. Why? Because the BBC people are not allowed opinions and it is opinions that the public wants to hear.”

The first presenter of Dateline was Charles Wheeler, an impeccable BBC journalist, who was the network’s correspondent in India in the late 1950s and early 1960s, married an Indian and was Boris Johnson’s father-in-law. The programme was granted a mere six-week contract.

Guthrie claimed there were only three formal complaints about Dateline’s content in its quarter of a century existence. One of these was from the Indian government, which objected to the London correspondent of Hindustan Times criticising the late Queen Elizabeth’s mother, known as The Queen Mother, ‘over something’!

“Every week for those past 25 years some of the most distinguished commentators and foreign correspondents based here in London have been able to give their views on current events,” Guthrie underlined.

For 15 of those years, Ashis Ray, who was previously a presenter of South Asia Survey on the BBC’s World Service and then South Asia bureau chief and editor-at-large at CNN, was a familiar face on Dateline as the London correspondent of The Times of India, Business Standard and other Indian publications.

“I will miss Dateline,” he reflected. “It involved polite, yet enlightening and penetrative submission of views, mostly very well moderated.”

ALSO READ-TikTok fastest growing news source for teens, BBC loses steam

Categories
-Top News Social Media UK News

TikTok fastest growing news source for teens, BBC loses steam

Users of TikTok for news get more of their news from ‘other people they follow’ than ‘news organisations’…reports Asian Lite News

Teenagers in the UK are turning away from traditional news channels and are instead looking to Instagram, TikTok (that saw fastest growth) and YouTube to keep up to date, the country’s communications regulator Ofcom said on Thursday.

For the first time, Instagram is the most popular news source among teenagers, used by nearly three in 10 in 2022 (29 per cent).

TikTok and YouTube follow closely behind, used by 28 per cent of youngsters to follow news.

Chinese short video-making platform TikTok has seen the fastest increase in use of any news source between 2020 and 2022 – from 0.8 million UK adults in 2020 to 3.9 million in 2022.

“This brings it onto a par with Sky News’ website and app. TikTok’s growth is primarily driven by younger age groups, with half of its news users aged 16 to 24,” the report said.

Users of TikTok for news get more of their news from ‘other people they follow’ than ‘news organisations’.

“Social media is overtaking traditional channels for news among teens. Instagram, TikTok and YouTube are now their top three most used sources for news,” Ofcom said in its report.

Five of the top six TV channels (including BBC One which remains the top news source across platforms) saw decreased reach from 2021 among online adults.

“BBC One and BBC Two – historically the most popular news sources among teens – have been knocked off top spot down to fifth place. Around a quarter of teens (24 per cent) use these channels for news in 2022, compared to nearly half (45 per cent) just five years ago,” the report mentioned.

Reach of print/online newspapers has seen a decrease from 2020 (47 per cent) to 2022 (38 per cent).

“The decrease is driven by decreases in print (online newspaper reach remains steady) which have likely been exacerbated by the pandemic,” the report mentioned.

While the reach of print newspapers is decreasing, online newspaper reach remains steady.

BBC

The Daily Mail/Mail on Sunday remains the most widely-read print news title overall, whilst The Guardian/Observer and Daily Mail/Mail on Sunday are the most widely-read digital titles, the report noted.

The BBC website / app remains the most used ‘other website/app’, used by 23 per cent of the UK adults, followed by Google (search engine) used by 12 per cent of the UK adults, a decrease from 2020.

YouTube, Yahoo News and Apple News reach all have increased since 2020 and 13 per cent of the adults say they use news aggregators, the report mentioned.

“The reach of podcasts is small overall (10 per cent) and the attitudes towards online sources’ news provision remain consistent with 2020,” it added.

ALSO READ-BBC chief apologises for Bashir’s Diana interview

Categories
-Top News UK News

BBC chief apologises for Bashir’s Diana interview

According to Variety, the Dyson report also found that Bashir used deceitful methods to gain access to Princess Diana, including allegedly forging documents…reports Asian Lite News

BBC Director General Tim Davie has issued a public apology to Prince Charles and his sons William and Harry over the infamous 1995 BBC Princess Diana ‘Panorama’ interview.

Princess Diana was interviewed by journalist Martin Bashir on the programme. An independent investigation into the programme, conducted by Lord Dyson, found that the public broadcaster “fell short of the high standards of integrity and transparency which are its hallmark.”

According to Variety, the Dyson report also found that Bashir used deceitful methods to gain access to Princess Diana, including allegedly forging documents.

The methods also included allegations that William and Harry’s former nanny Alexandra Pettifer, better known as Tiggy Legge-Bourke, had an affair with Charles. Pettifer filed a defamation claim in the London High Court, which she won on Thursday.

Shortly after the court ruling, Davie issued a statement.

“Following publication of the Dyson Report last year, we have been working with those who suffered as a result of the deceitful tactics used by the BBC in pursuit of its interview with Diana, Princess of Wales for the Panorama programme in 1995, including the matters that were mentioned in court today in respect of Miss Tiggy Legge-Bourke, now Mrs. Alexandra Pettifer.”

“The BBC has agreed to pay substantial damages to Mrs. Pettifer and I would like to take this opportunity to apologise publicly to her, to the Prince of Wales (Charles), and to the Dukes of Cambridge (William) and Sussex (Harry), for the way in which Princess Diana was deceived and the subsequent impact on all their lives.

“It is a matter of great regret that the BBC did not get to the facts in the immediate aftermath of the programme when there were warning signs that the interview might have been obtained improperly.”

“Instead, as The Duke of Cambridge himself put it, the BBC failed to ask the tough questions. Had we done our job properly, Princess Diana would have known the truth during her lifetime. We let her, the Royal Family and our audiences down.”

“Now we know about the shocking way that the interview was obtained I have decided that the BBC will never show the programme again; nor will we license it in whole or part to other broadcasters.”

“It does of course remain part of the historical record and there may be occasions in the future when it will be justified for the BBC to use short extracts for journalistic purposes, but these will be few and far between and will need to be agreed at Executive Committee level and set in the full context of what we now know about the way the interview was obtained. I would urge others to exercise similar restraint.”

ALSO READ-Climate activist Aditya Dubey’s journey to Diana Award