Categories
-Top News Europe UK News

Boris Rubbishes Allegations That He ‘Let Covid Rip’

Dismissing the implications drawn from the diary extracts, Johnson insisted that his position was centered on saving human life across all age groups…reports Asian Lite News

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson vehemently denied pursuing a “let it rip” strategy in managing the coronavirus pandemic during his testimony at the Covid inquiry. Insisting that he actively contributed counter arguments to challenge consensus in meetings, Johnson asserted that his actions aimed to curb the virus rather than allowing it to freely spread through the population. His testimony focused on countering accusations of being slow to react when Covid-19 cases surged again in the autumn of 2020.

Facing nearly ten hours of questioning, Johnson passionately rejected the notion that he was reluctant to enforce a second lockdown, dismissing claims that he prioritized keeping the economy open over protecting vulnerable populations. During a particularly tense exchange, he labelled such ideas as “rubbish” and emphasized his commitment to “save human life at all ages.”

The second day of Johnson’s testimony delved into the events of the autumn of 2020, with accusations that he delayed reimposing restrictions as cases rose. Reference was made to Sir Patrick Vallance’s diary, the government’s chief scientific adviser at the time. Johnson was confronted with an entry from October, quoting him as advocating for “letting it all rip” and suggesting that potential victims had “had a good innings” and “reached their time anyway.” The inquiry’s lead lawyer insinuated that these “secretly held” views influenced Johnson’s reluctance to reimpose restrictions, to which he vehemently disagreed.

Dismissing the implications drawn from the diary extracts, Johnson insisted that his position was centered on saving human life across all age groups. He defended his decisions, emphasizing that the government implemented lockdown measures as soon as feasible and highlighting his role in challenging consensus during meetings.

In addressing the language he used, Johnson expressed regret for any “hurt and offence” caused, attributing his unpolished communication style to fostering an environment where others felt free to express themselves. He disputed the accuracy of reported accounts, stating that some described words were unfamiliar to him. As protesters demonstrated outside the inquiry building, holding pictures of lost loved ones and expressing their grievances, Johnson maintained his position that his actions throughout the pandemic were driven by a commitment to safeguarding human life.

ALSO READ-Sunak’s Diplomatic Misstep Deepens Concerns in Tory Circles

Categories
-Top News UK News

Boris Johnson attacks UK aid to Ukraine

Johnson directed his message not just at the UK but the US and other western nations, as well as global “swing voters” such as India…reports Asian Lite News

Boris Johnson has attacked the government over its policy on Ukraine, saying it should urgently provide more weaponry requested by Kyiv and asking the west: “What the hell are we waiting for?”

The former prime minister, who formed a close relationship with Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskiy after the outbreak of the war with Russia, called on the UK to provide howitzers – an artillery weapon – Storm Shadow cruise missiles and “as much help as we can give them with drone technology”.

Writing for the Spectator magazine, which he used to edit, Johnson said it could be a “relatively trivial outlay for extraordinary potential reward” if western nations were to provide more military support. He called for a “far greater sense of urgency about our programme of military assistance”.

“I have asked it before and I ask it again: what the hell are we waiting for?” Johnson wrote. He said Ukrainians did not want warm words but “weaponry to finish the job – and so I simply do not understand why we keep dragging our feet”.

“Why are we always so slow?” he said. “How can we look these men in the eye, and explain the delay? Throughout this war we have underestimated the Ukrainians and overestimated Putin, and we are doing the same today.”

Johnson directed his message not just at the UK but the US and other western nations, as well as global “swing voters” such as India.

“If Putin wins – and all he has to do, to claim a victory, is hang on to at least a chunk of the territory he has taken since 24 February 2022 – the dreadful message will go round the world: that this was the moment when the democracies pledged to stand up to the autocracies, and we flunked it,” he wrote. “The story of Ukraine will be of lion-hearted Ukrainian troops finally betrayed by western loss of nerve.”

No western country has provided any troops to Ukraine but the US has provided military assistance of more than $43bn (£34bn) since the start of the Biden administration.

The UK is the second largest donor, having committed £4.6bn in military assistance to Ukraine so far, including £2.3bn in 2022 and a commitment to match that funding in 2023. It is also involved in a programme of training 30,000 new and existing Ukrainian personnel by the end of the year.

Britain is providing long-range precision strike missiles, and has recently committed to training Ukrainian fast jet pilots, but has said that combat fighter aircraft will not be provided for the moment.

The UK’s new defence secretary, Grant Shapps, said on his appointment that he was looking forward to “continuing the UK’s support for Ukraine in their fight against Putin’s barbaric invasion”.

ALSO READ-China poses threat to UK way of life, says Sunak

Categories
-Top News Europe UK News

Boris earned millions on top of PM’s salary

The outside earnings come from a variety of sources including consultancies, speeches and television work including for the right-wing GB News…reports Asian Lite News

British lawmakers earned some 10 million pounds ($6.1 million) on top of their parliamentary salaries over the past year with former Prime Minister Boris Johnson accounting for nearly half the total amount, a report said.

Johnson, who reportedly complained bitterly while in office about his 164,000-pound prime ministerial salary, earned 4.8 million pounds, according to an analysis by The Guardian daily published late on Sunday.

The former prime minister resigned as an MP in June following his ouster as British leader in July 2022.

An additional 400,000 pounds was earned by members of the opposition Labour Party and two other smaller parties, the newspaper’s analysis found.

The outside earnings come from a variety of sources including consultancies, speeches and television work including for the right-wing GB News.

Former business secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg nets around 29,000 pounds a month to host a programme for the outlet.

Another Conservative former finance and health minister, Sajid Javid, earns around 25,000 pounds a month as an adviser to an investment firm.

The figures, compiled from parliament’s Register of MPs’ interests, follow an outcry over a lobbying scandal in 2021 and another row over a Conservative MP paid around 5.5 million pounds as a lawyer since entering parliament. Members of parliament earn a basic salary of 86,000 pounds.

Plans to limit the time lawmakers can dedicate to second jobs were dropped last year. Parliament’s standards committee made some recommendations for changes to the rules.

Without cross-party agreement on the issue, however, it said the current system should remain in place.

ALSO READ-UN slams UK govt’s Illegal Migration Bill

Categories
-Top News Social Media UK News

UK govt loses court battle over Johnson’s Covid WhatsApps

The material must now be handed to the inquiry by 4pm on Monday. The government said it will “comply fully” with the High Court judgment…reports Asian Lite News

The Cabinet Office has lost its legal bid to withhold Boris Johnson’s unredacted WhatsApp messages and notebooks from the COVID-19 Inquiry.

Inquiry chair Baroness Hallett issued an order – known as a section 21 notice – for the government to release the former prime minister’s documents in May.

The Cabinet Office argued some of the content was “unambiguously irrelevant” and brought a judicial review against the notice.

But in a judgement published on Thursday, the High Court ruled while “some irrelevant documents” may be included in the material requested, that “does not invalidate the notice or mean that the section 21 cannot be lawfully exercised”.

It dismissed the Cabinet Office’s claim for judicial review, but said but said the department could make a different application to Baroness Hallett.

The material must now be handed to the inquiry by 4pm on Monday. The government said it will “comply fully” with the High Court judgment.

A spokesperson said: “The inquiry is an important step to learn lessons from the pandemic and the government is cooperating in the spirit of candour and transparency.

“As this judgment acknowledges, our judicial review application was valid as it raised issues over the application of the Inquiries Act 2005 that have now been clarified. The court’s judgment is a sensible resolution and will mean that the inquiry chair is able to see the information she may deem relevant, but we can work together to have an arrangement that respects the privacy of individuals and ensures completely irrelevant information is returned and not retained.”

Responding to the ruling, Labour’s Deputy Leader Angela Rayner said: “While the rest of the country battles the cost-of-living crisis, Rishi Sunak has been wasting time and taxpayers’, money on doomed legal battles to withhold evidence from the COVID Inquiry.

“After this latest humiliating defeat, the prime minister must accept the ruling and comply with the inquiry’s requests for evidence in full.

Deborah Doyle, spokesperson for COVID-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, said the judicial review lodged by the government “was a desperate waste of time and money”.

“The inquiry needs to get to the facts if the country is to learn lessons that will save lives in the future,” she said. “That means it needs to be able to access all of the evidence, not just what the Cabinet Office wants it to see. A successful inquiry could save thousands of lives in the event of another pandemic, and it’s a disgrace that the Cabinet Office is trying to obstruct it. Any attempt to appeal this decision or hinder its work further would be utterly shameful.”

In their ruling, Lord Justice Dingemans and Justice Garnham concluded Baroness Hallett had “acted rationally” when making her order.

Addressing the concern that unrelated material could be seen by the inquiry, the two judges noted that the Cabinet Office could make an application arguing “that it is unreasonable to produce material which does not relate to a matter in question at the inquiry” – and that it would be for the chair to “rule on that application”.

ALSO READ-Optimistic about FTA with India, says Lord Johnson

Categories
-Top News UK News

UK MPs approve report censuring Johnson  

The House of Commons voted 354 to seven on Monday to endorse the privileges committee’s report…reports Asian Lite News

Legislators in the United Kingdom have voted to approve a report that recommended sanctioning former Prime Minister Boris Johnson for lying to parliament about boozy, law-breaking parties held during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The House of Commons voted 354 to seven on Monday to endorse the privileges committee’s report, which concluded that the former leader should have his parliamentary pass revoked. Had he not already quit, it would have also recommended a 90-day suspension from parliament.

Johnson abruptly resigned from parliament 10 days ago after seeing an advance copy of the report, calling the inquiry a “witch hunt”.

“It is important to show the public that there is not one rule for them and another for us,” said Conservative Party politician Theresa May, Johnson’s predecessor as prime minister.

Opening the five-hour debate, House of Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt urged legislators to “do what they think is right”. Mordaunt, a Conservative like Johnson, said she would vote to endorse the report by the Commons Privileges Committee.

“This matters because the integrity of our institutions matter. The respect and trust afforded to them matters,” said Mordaunt. “This has real-world consequences for the accountability of members of Parliament to each other and the members of the public they represent.”

A handful of Johnson allies spoke up to defend the former leader. MP Lia Nici said, “I cannot see where the evidence is where Boris Johnson misled Parliament knowingly, intentionally or recklessly”.

Many Conservative MPs were absent from the debate – including Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. Wary of riling Johnson’s remaining supporters, he stayed away.

Max Blain, Sunak’s spokesman, said the prime minister had “a number of commitments,” including a meeting with Sweden’s leader.

Johnson, who turned 59 on Monday, was not there either. He stepped down as prime minister in September 2022 but remained an MP until June 9, when he quit after receiving notice of the Privileges Committee’s findings.

Monday’s debate was the latest aftershock from the “Partygate” scandal over gatherings in the prime minister’s Downing Street headquarters and other government buildings in 2020 and 2021.

The revelation that political staffers held birthday gatherings, garden parties, and “wine time Fridays” during the pandemic sparked anger among Britons who had followed rules imposed to curb the spread of the coronavirus, unable to visit friends and family – or even say goodbye to dying relatives in hospitals.

Labour Party MP Chris Bryant said “there is visceral anger” among voters about Partygate.

Memories were revived this week by the Sunday Mirror newspaper’s publication of video showing staffers drinking and dancing at an event at Conservative Party headquarters in December 2020, when people from different households were banned from mixing indoors.

The Privileges Committee of MPs, which has a Conservative majority, was asked to investigate whether Mr Johnson had misled MPs over what he knew about parties held in Downing Street during Covid lockdowns – dubbed the Partygate scandal.

Its report concluded that Johnson made multiple deliberately misleading statements to Parliament about events at No 10. Ahead of the report’s publication, Johnson announced he was quitting as an MP, branding the committee a “kangaroo court”.

The report found Johnson had committed further “contempts” of Parliament by attacking the committee, increasing the severity of the recommended sanction.

The committee subsequently recommended a 90-day suspension for Johnson – a long ban by recent standards – as well as denying him the parliamentary pass, which he would normally be entitled to as a former MP. If he had still been an MP, the suspension could have triggered a by-election in his constituency.

Speaking during a Commons debate ahead of the vote, Mrs May said backing the report would be “a small but important step in restoring people’s trust” in Parliament.

It was “important to show the public that there is not one rule for them and another for us”, she said.

May urged her fellow MPs to vote in support of the report “to uphold standards in public life, to show that we all recognise the responsibility we have to the people we serve, and to help to restore faith in our parliamentary democracy”.

During the debate, supporters of Johnson spoke out against the report’s findings. Nici, who was Johnson’s parliamentary private secretary, told MPs she could not see any evidence he had knowingly misled Parliament.

She questioned the impartiality of the committee and suggested the process was “political opportunism” for people who did not like Johnson.

Former minister Sir Jacob, who was knighted by Johnson in his resignation honours, described the proposed 90-day suspension as “a vindictive sanction”. In response to accusations some Johnson allies had attempted to discredit the committee’s work, Rees-Mogg said it was “absolutely legitimate to criticise the conduct of a committee” and its members.

However, the committee’s chairwoman, Labour MP Harriet Harman, said its members had to “withstand a campaign of threats, intimidation, and harassment designed to challenge the legitimacy of the inquiry”.

ALSO READ-UK govt stops lower duty access for $1 bn exports

Categories
-Top News UK News

MPs to hold vote on Boris’ partygate report

It will be a free vote for Tory MPs, meaning party managers will not instruct them what to do at the vote…reports Asian Lite News

MPs will decide later whether to endorse a report that found Boris Johnson deliberately misled Parliament over lockdown parties in No 10.

A year-long inquiry from the Commons privileges committee said the former prime minister committed repeated offences with his Partygate denials. It recommends he should have been suspended from the Commons for 90 days if he had remained an MP.

Rishi Sunak is yet to confirm whether he will vote on its findings. It will be a free vote for Tory MPs, meaning party managers – known as whips – will not instruct them what to do at the vote, which is expected to take place on Monday evening after a debate.

The report is expected to pass easily, but it is unclear whether a vote will be recorded, with Johnson asking his allies not to vote against it.

Asked by ITV’s Good Morning Britain, Sunak repeatedly declined to say if he would vote on the report, saying it is “a matter for the House [of Commons], not for the government”.

“That’s an important distinction and that’s why I wouldn’t want to influence anyone in advance of that vote,” he said.

It is likely that some Conservative MPs could abstain or not turn up to take part. Housing Secretary Michael Gove, who also served in Johnson’s cabinet, has confirmed he intends to abstain – becoming the only member of the Sunak government to say what he intends to do.

Speaking on Sunday, he said there were areas where Johnson’s conduct had fallen short of expectations, but he disagreed with the report’s recommendation for a 90-day suspension.

The vote is tricky politically for the prime minister, who is embroiled in a bitter war of words with his former boss over his resignation honours list.

Sunak vowed to put “integrity” at the heart of his government upon entering Downing Street, and will be under pressure from opposition MPs to approve the findings from the cross-party committee.

But voting for it would enrage Johnson’s supporters, some of whom have attacked the committee over their conclusions.

Johnson himself also lashed out at the committee in an angry statement announcing his resignation as an MP before the report’s publication, branding it a “kangaroo court”.

Commons votes are initially conducted by voice, with a division – where MPs go through the voting lobbies to record their support – only called if the Speaker thinks the result is not obvious.

Opposition MPs are expected to shout “aye” later to approve the report, but if no MP in the chamber shouts “no” then there won’t be a division, meaning the votes of individual MPs will not be recorded.

In their report, the privileges committee said Johnson had deliberately misled MPs when he assured them after the Partygate scandal emerged that lockdown rules had always been followed in No 10.

Johnson argued during the inquiry that his assurances were made in good faith, and were based on advice from officials. But the MPs found he had “personal knowledge” of rule-breaking events, and had failed to “pro-actively” investigate allegations that Covid rules had been broken during the pandemic.

They concluded he had committed multiple “contempts” of Parliament – including by attacking the committee, which they added justified the 90-day ban, which is lengthy by the standards of recent years. The report also recommends that Mr Johnson should be denied a parliamentary pass, which he would normally be entitled to as an ex-MP.

Several of Johnson’s allies have heaped criticism on the committee for its findings. Nadine Dorries, who was culture secretary in Johnson’s cabinet, said the committee had “overreached,” warning that any Tory MP voting to endorse it would be “held to account” by party members.

However, it is not clear how many of his allies are ultimately willing to turn up to register their opposition.

Gove not to vote for Johnson

Michael Gove says he will not vote for a report that found Boris Johnson deliberately misled Parliament over Partygate.

The housing secretary said there were areas where the ex-PM “falls short” of expectations.

But he said he disagreed with the report’s recommendation that Mr Johnson should have been suspended for 90 days if he had remained an MP.

Gove said he would abstain in a vote scheduled for Monday on the report.

Downing Street has yet to say how Prime Minister Rishi Sunak intends to vote, or even if he would take part.

On Friday, his spokesman told reporters he was still taking the time to “consider the report fully”.

It will be a free vote for Conservative MPs, meaning party managers – known as whips – will not instruct them which way to vote.

In the damning 106-page report, the seven-member Commons privileges committee, which has a Tory majority, said Johnson had deliberately misled MPs over lockdown parties in Downing Street.

He had “personal knowledge” of rule-breaking, and had “closed his mind” by not seeking assurances about compliance, it found.

It said it would have recommended a 90-day Commons suspension for Mr Johnson, partly because of his furious reaction to an advance copy of the report’s findings, including him calling the committee a “kangaroo court”.

The suspension will not apply given the former prime minister quit as an MP before the report was published.

The committee said his calling the committee a “kangaroo court” in his resignation statement had “impugned the integrity” of Parliament.

ALSO READ-Partygate report looms as Boris lashes out

Categories
-Top News UK News

Partygate report looms as Boris lashes out

Boris Johnson has called for the resignation of Sir Bernard Jenkin, following allegations that he breached Covid restrictions by attending a drinks party in the House of Commons for his wife’s birthday in December 2020…reports Asian Lite News

A long-awaited report by MPs investigating whether former Prime Minister Boris Johnson misled Parliament over Partygate is set to be published on Thursday. The report follows a year-long inquiry conducted by the Privileges Committee.

Prior to the report’s release, Johnson resigned as an MP after receiving an advance copy of the findings, claiming he had been deemed guilty “regardless of the facts.”

In a separate development, on Wednesday, Johnson called for the resignation of a committee member, Sir Bernard Jenkin, following allegations that he breached Covid restrictions by attending a drinks party in the House of Commons for his wife’s birthday in December 2020.

These allegations, first reported by the Guido Fawkes website, suggest that the gathering took place at a time when social mixing outside of households or support bubbles was banned in London.

A BBC report stated that it had been unable to independently verify the claims after contacting various individuals involved, Sir Bernard, Lady Jenkin, and the alleged party host have been approached for comment.

Sir Bernard originally denied attending any drinks parties during lockdown. When he was asked by a Guido Fawkes reporter whether he had a drink at the celebration of his wife’s birthday that evening, Sir Bernard is quoted as saying “I don’t recall”, the BBC reported.

Dame Eleanor Laing, the Deputy Speaker, who allegedly hosted the party, stated that she had sought guidance on the maximum number of people allowed in a room and had taken measures to ensure the safety of those working in the building.

In response to the allegations, Johnson has written to Harriet Harman, who chairs the inquiry, demanding clarification on whether she ensured that panel members had not attended similar events before the inquiry commenced. He accused Sir Bernard of “flagrant and monstrous hypocrisy” if the reports were true.

Few days ago in his resignation statement, Johnson described the committee as a “kangaroo court” whose purpose “from the beginning has been to find me guilty, regardless of the facts”.

Johnson previously admitted misleading Parliament when he gave evidence to the committee in a combative hearing in March – but denied doing it on purpose.

Johnson said the committee “have still not produced a shred of evidence that I knowingly or recklessly misled the Commons”.

“They know perfectly well that when I spoke in the Commons I was saying what I believed sincerely to be true and what I had been briefed to say, like any other minister,” he said.

He said that social distancing had not been “perfect” at gatherings in Downing Street during Covid lockdowns but insisted the guidelines, as he understood them, were followed at all times.

Johnson was asked repeatedly by a cross-party parliamentary panel in March this year whether he attended parties, broke lockdown rules, misled Parliament, and should resign.

Johnson denied deliberately lying, but if found to have done so, he could face suspension or even lose his seat in Parliament.

He told the committee that the rule-breaking events were wrong and “I bitterly regret it,” but added, “hand on heart, that I did not lie to the House.”

A day after Johnson’s resignation, former Home Secretary Priti Patel praised the leader calling him as the UK’s “most electorally successful Prime Minister since Margaret Thatcher”.

“Boris Johnson has served our country and his constituency with distinction. He led the world in supporting Ukraine, got Brexit done, and was our most electorally successful Prime Minister since Margaret Thatcher. Boris is a political titan whose legacy will stand the test of time,” Patel tweeted.

British-Indians Patel and Kulveer Singh Ranger have been rewarded in Johnson’s honours list, which came hours before he stepped down as an MP.

Patel was named Dames Commander of the Order of the British Empire, while Ranger, former director of transport, was elevated to the Lords.

Patel, 51, served as Home Secretary under Boris Johnson beginning July 2019, and tendered her resignation from the post in September 2022, just before the appointment of Liz Truss as Prime Minister.

The honours list, a tradition granted to outgoing Prime Ministers, included 38 honours and seven peerages, and was approved by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak nine months after Johnson stepped down as premier.

ALSO READ-Boris and Rishi at war

Categories
-Top News UK News

Boris and Rishi at war

Sunak said Johnson had asked him to over-rule advice from the House of Lords appointments commission…reports Asian Lite News

Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson traded recriminations over the latter’s resignation honours list on Monday, as MPs prepared to publish what is expected to be a highly critical report about the former prime minister’s conduct.

Sunak accused Johnson of asking him to wave through a long list of allies to the House of Lords, prompting the former prime minister to say the current premier was “talking rubbish”.

The war of words came as MPs on the cross-party House of Commons privileges committee met to finalise their report into whether Johnson deliberately misled parliament about the partygate scandal.

Sunak rounded on Johnson after the latter on Friday announced he was quitting the Commons, with the former premier claiming the committee was engaged in a “political hit job” despite not having a “shred of evidence” against him.

Johnson made his shock move shortly after his resignations honours list was published, which contained peerages and other gongs for many of his allies.

Sunak said Johnson had asked him to over-rule advice from the House of Lords appointments commission, which vets nominations for peerages.

“When it comes to honours and Boris Johnson, Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn’t prepared to do because I didn’t think it was right, either to over-rule the… committee or make promises to people,” said Sunak.

The Lords appointments commission has confirmed it rejected eight proposed candidates for peerages made by Johnson.

Downing Street has denied claims by Johnson’s allies that Sunak broke a promise to wave through the former’s entire resignation honours list.

“I wasn’t prepared to do that because I didn’t think that was right,” Sunak said at the Tech Week conference in London.

“And if people don’t like that, then tough. When I got this job I said I was going to do things differently because I was going to change politics.”

Johnson hit back angrily at Sunak, saying he had not asked for the Lords appointments commission to be overruled.

He appeared to suggest he wanted the commission to re-vet some of his nominees for peerages, saying: “To honour these peerages it was not necessary to over-rule [the commission] — but simply to ask them to renew their vetting, which was a mere formality.”

Meanwhile the Commons privileges committee is poised to release its report about Johnson’s conduct as soon as Tuesday.

The committee is expected to accuse Johnson of misleading the Commons when he said while prime minister that he did not know about parties held in Number 10 during Covid-19 restrictions.

MPs on the committee have been given additional security, amid accusations by Johnson that they have behaved like a “kangaroo court”.

Michael Gove, levelling-up secretary, told the BBC: “I do deprecate the fact [the MPs on the committee] are now in a position where, as reported, they have had to seek and have been granted additional security. I extend my sympathy to them and their families.”

Two former MPs who had expected to receive peerages from Johnson — Nadine Dorries and Nigel Adams — have announced they are also quitting the Commons, prompting three parliamentary by-elections.

Johnson and Adams have formally triggered the mechanism to step down from parliament, shifting the impetus to the government to decide when to call the by-elections.

Labour is confident of winning Johnson’s Uxbridge and South Ruislip constituency, where he had a majority of 7,210 at the last general election.

But Adams’ Selby and Ainsty seat in Yorkshire will be harder for Labour: the Tories have a 20,137 majority.

The Liberal Democrats are focusing their efforts on winning Dorries’ Mid Bedfordshire constituency, where the Conservatives have a 24,664 majority.

Speculation has intensified at Westminster about the prospect of Johnson attempting to return to the Commons at the next general election, after he said on Friday he was leaving parliament “for now”.

Senior Tory figures expressed split views about whether Johnson should be allowed to stand again as a Conservative parliamentary candidate after quitting.

One minister said: “He’s just resigned from his seat which has a 7,000-plus majority. What right does he have to seek another?”

However, one Conservative official said it would be highly unusual to block Johnson from joining the Tory parliamentary candidates’ list and “would cause yet another drama” in the party.

ALSO READ-Boris Johnson resigns as MP

Categories
-Top News UK News

Senior Tories tell Johnson to ‘shut up’

Some MPs loyal to the former PM who sought to sway the committee’s decision are also said to be at risk of being investigated…reports Asian Lite News

Boris Johnson and his allies have been told by senior Conservatives to “shut up and go away” as the privileges committee prepares to sign off what is expected to be a damning report into his conduct.

MPs on the committee are understood to have received threats from members of the public over the weekend, following Johnson’s decision to stand down as an MP after being told they had concluded he deliberately misled parliament over Partygate.

Some MPs loyal to the former prime minister who sought to sway the committee’s decision are also said to be at risk of being investigated for a separate contempt of parliament.

Boris Johnson leaves his London home on March 23, the day after his appearance before the privileges committee that has now precipitated his downfall.

The seven-strong committee, which has a Tory majority and Labour chair, will regroup at 11am on Monday to finalise the conclusion to their year-long inquiry. They are likely to speed up the the publication of their report, with the details of their findings made public as soon as Wednesday.

While Johnson cannot be sanctioned with a suspension now he has resigned, the committee could recommend that he be refused a pass offered to ex-MPs allowing privileged access to parliament.

Such a move would be in the power of the Commons speaker, Lindsay Hoyle, and it has been recommended before by a parliamentary watchdog. An independent expert panel proposed the sanction for former speaker John Bercow in its report on bullying which was published after he stepped down as an MP.

Some of Johnson’s allies are said to have urged Tory members to write to the privileges committee in a bid to influence its conclusions. The Guardian understands several MPs have held talks on the possibility of tabling a motion with a view to holding them in contempt of parliament.

Tim Loughton, a Tory MP and former minister, said Johnson should “shut up and go away” and branded his allies a “mob”. A government source added: “The witch-hunt narrative is held by a sad rump of Boris worshippers, whose numbers are small.”

In a bid to distance Rishi Sunak from his predecessor-but-one, the energy secretary Grant Shapps said “the world has moved on” from Johnson. He suggested that Johnson was wrong to claim No 10 had promised all the MPs he nominated for peerages would be approved, saying: “Occasionally Boris wouldn’t be all over the detail.”

Shapps said MPs on the privileges committee should be allowed to “get on with their job” and played down Johnson’s potential future in the Conservative party, telling Sky News: “I’m sure he’s got many other things he wants to get on and do.”

Jacob Rees-Mogg, who was knighted in Johnson’s resignation honours, said he was hopeful about the former prime minister’s chance of a comeback. He said Sunak should remain leader until the next general election – but predicted that “at some indeterminate date in the future when Rishi’s hair has gone grey and he decides to retire,” Johnson could come back “on his charger to save the nation”.

While Sunak has made no public appearance since Johnson’s resignation, the prime minister broke his silence on Twitter to tell followers he was “focused on your priorities”. He cited progress on three of his “five pledges”..

A flurry of campaigning has already begun for the three byelections triggered by the resignation of Johnson loyalists Nadine Dorries and Nigel Adams.

Unlike at previous byelections, Labour and the Liberal Democrats appear to have ditched an informal non-aggression pact in Dorries’ seat. Senior figures from both parties and activists have already flooded the area – aware of the high prize that taking a constituency with a 24,000 Tory majority would be.

Anneliese Dodds, Labour’s chair, and Shabana Mahmood, the party’s campaign coordinator, raced there over the weekend. The Lib Dems, meanwhile, said it had been “our best start to a byelection campaign in living memory” and claimed to have already canvassed more than 10,000 homes with Ed Davey appearing on Sunday and planning a return visit on Monday.

Labour came second place in the constituency with 14,000 votes at the last election, to the Lib Dems’ 8,000. A three-way fight could lead the anti-Conservative vote to splinter, making the prospect of a Tory loss less likely.

Opposition parties have already been campaigning in earnest in Johnson’s Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat, where the Tories’ majority is a relatively slim 7,000. They expect to ramp up their presence in Selby and Ainsty, which was vacated by Adams on Saturday.

Sunak was urged to call the three byelections swiftly. “It would be sensible for them to take place as quickly as possible,” said Robert Hayward, a Conservative peer and elections expert.

ALSO READ-Boris Johnson resigns as MP

Categories
-Top News UK News

Boris Johnson condemns fresh ‘Partygate’ claims

Justice Secretary Alex Chalk said on Tuesday there had been no ministerial involvement in the passing on of the new alleged breaches…reports Asian Lite News

Former prime minister Boris Johnson has condemned the handling of fresh allegations of Covid lockdown rule-breaking as “bizarre and unacceptable”, as he faces a further possible probe into the “Partygate” scandal that helped push him from office.

It emerged on Tuesday that a government ministry had handed two police forces material about alleged violations of pandemic regulations.

Johnson, 58, was ousted as prime minister last summer following a revolt within his ruling party after months of accusations of lockdown infringements and other scandals.

He repeatedly denied in parliament, and elsewhere, that he or his staff had broken his own pandemic era restrictions by holding boozy gatherings in Downing Street.

But the Met issued fines to dozens of aides after a criminal probe, and Johnson became the first serving UK prime minister found to have broken the law, over one of the gatherings.

London’s Metropolitan Police has confirmed it is “assessing” new information it received over the last week related to “potential breaches” of the coronavirus rules in Downing Street between June 2020 and May 2021.

The information was passed on by the Cabinet Office, the government department responsible for supporting prime ministers and ensuring the effective running of government.

The ministry is currently preparing a public inquiry into the country’s pandemic response.

Johnson is also still being investigated by parliament’s Privileges Committee over whether he lied to MPs about “Partygate”, in a process that could ultimately trigger his removal as a lawmaker.

A statement issued by Johnson’s office, however, said his lawyers had written to police to “explain in detail why the Cabinet Office is entirely wrong in its assertions”.

“No contact was made with Mr Johnson before these incorrect allegations were made both to the police and to the Privileges Committee. This is both bizarre and unacceptable.

“For whatever political purpose, it is plain that a last-ditch attempt is being made to lengthen the Privileges Committee investigation as it was coming to a conclusion and to undermine Mr Johnson.”

The statement described the events in question as “entirely within the rules either because they were held outdoors or came within another lawful exception. They include regular meetings with civil servants and advisers”.

Justice Secretary Alex Chalk said on Tuesday there had been no ministerial involvement in the passing on of the new alleged breaches.

“Material came to light which was passed to the civil service. The civil service considered that in accordance with their code, and with no ministerial intervention,” Chalk told LBC radio.

“Ultimately, whether it was the right judgement to do it turns on what’s in those documents. And I’ve not seen those documents,” he added.

ALSO READ-Johnson may face probe again after fresh ‘Partygate’ claims