Categories
-Top News UK News

Lib Dems to table no confidence motion against Sunak

At least 24 Tory MPs would need to vote for the motion for it to pass and the Government to lose…reports Asian Lite News

The Liberal Democrats are to table a motion of no confidence in the Government in an effort to force a June election. The Lib Dems are demanding a vote on Rishi Sunak’s administration after a strong showing at the local elections, in which they won more seats than the Conservatives.

The draft text of the motion reads “that this House has no confidence in His Majesty’s Government”.

By convention, if a prime minister loses a vote of no confidence in his or her government, they would have to ask the King to dissolve Parliament, triggering a general election.

However, even if all opposition parties supported the motion – including many former Tory MPs sitting as independents – the Government is certain to win a vote because the Conservatives have a working majority of 47 and a backbench plot to oust Mr Sunak was abandoned last week.

At least 24 Tory MPs would need to vote for the motion for it to pass and the Government to lose.

On Friday, a group of disillusioned Conservative MPs and their advisers gave up on their efforts to topple Rishi Sunak following the re-election of Ben Houchen, the Tory mayor of Tees Valley, in spite of poor local election results.

In a statement on Monday, Sir Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader, said: “These local elections showed the country has had enough of Rishi Sunak and his out of touch Conservative Government. The Conservatives were pushed into third place for the first time in a generation as Liberal Democrats swept the board in former true blue heartlands. Yet Sunak continues to desperately cling on to power, holed up in Downing Street until the bitter end. Conservative MPs need to wake up and smell the coffee, and back giving the country the election it so desperately wants and needs. The longer this appalling Government stumbles on, the worse it is for the NHS, people’s living standards and our environment.”

It is unclear how likely the motion is to be selected by Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker of the Commons, but the Labour Party said it would back the Liberal Democrat motion if called for a vote.

A confidence motion in a government was last voted on in July 2022, when MPs voted by 349 to 238 in favour of Boris Johnson’s administration to give him seven more weeks in Downing Street before Liz Truss, his successor, took charge.

The vote had been tabled by Mr Johnson’s government itself in response to an attempt by Labour to hold a further confidence vote on his premiership.

He had survived a ballot of Tory MPs weeks earlier in the aftermath of the Downing Street parties scandal, only for his premiership to be brought down by the fallout from the Chris Pincher affair.

The last government to lose a vote following a confidence motion was James Callaghan’s Labour administration in 1979, forcing a general election five weeks later.

A motion of no confidence in the Government differs from a no confidence vote in Mr Sunak, which would be triggered by 52 Conservative MPs – 15 per cent of the parliamentary party – writing no confidence letters to Sir Graham Brady, the chairman of the 1922 committee.

A Liberal Democrat spokesman acknowledged that bringing forward the motion was “ultimately a decision for the Government”.

They added: “They should bring forward this motion so the House can have its say – every MP knows the British people are ready for an election.”

Prime Minister Sunak told journalists Monday: “Of course, this was a disappointing weekend for us but the result of the next general election isn’t a foregone conclusion … the situation is closer than many people are saying or indeed some of the opinion polls are predicting.”

“I’m absolutely determined to fight incredibly hard for what I believe and for the future country that I want to build,” the 43-year-old noted.

On the contrary, the Conservatives’ loss triggered nationwide demand for general elections as he had earlier noted that he had intended to do so in the second half of the year.

The ruling party could avert the no-confidence vote since they currently have the majority in the parliament’s lower house.

Reuters reported that the British government is not expected to give parliamentary time to debate confidence motions if brought forward by opposition parties other than the Labour Party.

Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said in the statement that the party would submit the motion on Tuesday. “These local elections showed the country has had enough of Rishi Sunak and his out-of-touch Conservative government,” Davey said.

Traditionally, governments that have lost a confidence vote have either resigned to make way for an alternative administration, or the prime minister has requested a dissolution from the monarch, triggering a national election.

The last time an election was forced by a no confidence motion was in 1979, when Jim Callaghan, then Labour prime minister, lost the vote in parliament and requested a dissolution.

ALSO READ-Sunak urges Tories to stick with his leadership  

Categories
-Top News London News

Lib Dems seek explanation for six years delay 

LAYLA MORAN MP: It should not have taken years to reach this day – nearly six years in the case of Nazanin. We should never have been in the situation where UK nationals are being used as political bargaining chips

SAROSH ZAIWALLA: The main obstacle the British Government gave for non-payment of the ‘legitimate debt’ was US sanctions. But, the government had managed to pay a large damages settlement to Bank Mellat in Iran despite the sanctions

Liberal Democrat Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Layla Moran MP questions the British government’s inability to get freedom for a civilian who was held captive in Iran over a ‘legitimate debt.’

“At a dark time, this is joyful news for us all to celebrate,” Moran in a statement. “Members of the public, NGOs, Parliamentarians and, of course, Nazanin and Anoosheh’s families have campaigned tirelessly for their release – it now looks like they are finally coming home.

“But it should not have taken years to reach this day – nearly six years in the case of Nazanin. We should never have been in the situation where UK nationals are being used as political bargaining chips. The UK Government has questions to answer for whether their actions, including those of the current Prime Minister, have prolonged this ordeal. I hope the Foreign Secretary will commit to an independent inquiry.

“I’m sure many tears are set to be cried in the next twenty-four hours. But for once I hope they are tears of joy.”

Sarosh Zaiwalla, Senior Partner at Zaiwalla & Co, said the delay to settle a ‘legitimate debt’ was unjustifiable.

“The main obstacle the British Government gave for non-payment of the ‘legitimate debt’ was US sanctions. But, the government had managed to pay a large damages settlement to Bank Mellat in Iran despite the sanctions,” Mr Zaiwalla told London Daily.

In 2008, an international arbitration court ruled that the UK did owe £400 million to Iran, and in 2020 the British government acknowledged the debt. Nevertheless, there has been an extended dispute over the exact amount that will be paid and what interest is due. In light of current sanctions that are applied against Iran, achieving repayment may still prove difficult.

Notably, the Defence Secretary Ben Wallace told Times Radio in a interview that Britain should clear the debt and that it was “absolutely right” that “we should honour that debt”. He added: “What we’ve said very clearly is that we comply with law and the rule of law . . . we should honour that debt and we should find ways to return it to Iran.”

“Despite the obvious diplomatic problems, there have been circumstances, historically, where significant debts between the two countries have been honoured. In 2013, one of Iran’s largest private banks, Bank Mellat, was held entitled to claim damages for a breach of human rights law by the UK government. More recently, the assessment of those damages came before the English courts. This action was stayed by a Tomlin Order, which attached a confidential settlement agreement. I am aware of its contents in a professional capacity.

“The Times reported that the quantum of the settlement involved very material payment obligations by the UK government. Having been personally involved in the payment issues, I am aware that the UK government fully and properly honoured those obligations. This clearly demonstrates that payment to Iranian interests can be made when it proves convenient to do so.”

Follow us: @londondailydig1

ALSO READ-Lib Dems Seek Tough Action on Russian Regime

Categories
-Top News London News UK News

Lib Dems Seek Tough Action on Russian Regime

Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey: “The era of Russian interference in this country must come to an end. Much of the legislation needed is ready to go – it must be brought before MPs immediately. Parliament must sit this weekend, day and night if we have to, to pass the necessary measures and impose the most punitive of sanctions upon Putin’s regime.”

Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey said parliament must sit this weekend to pass measures against Vladmir Putin and his cronies in Moscow,

Commenting following Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s address to the nation on Ukraine, Davey said:  “At this dark moment we must renew our commitments of international cooperation and stand with our allies against this horrendous invasion.

 “For too long we in the West have been complacent about the threat which Putin poses to our allies and to the fundamental values which underpin our way of life. No more. We must stand with the people of Ukraine and provide them with humanitarian and military aid, while unleashing the severest of sanctions against Putin and his cronies.

 “The era of Russian interference in this country must come to an end. Much of the legislation needed is ready to go – it must be brought before MPs immediately. Parliament must sit this weekend, day and night if we have to, to pass the necessary measures and impose the most punitive of sanctions upon Putin’s regime.”

 “A terrible human tragedy is now unfolding before our very eyes. We must stand with the people of Ukraine.  Putin’s maniacal ambitions will stop at nothing. The blood of every innocent Ukrainian who perishes in this entirely unprovoked and illegal invasion is on his hands.

 “Let us also not forget the human cost for the Russian people who are now embroiled in a war they did not ask for by a leader they cannot get rid of. It is time to let rip on the most severe of punitive sanctions. That must include an immediate end to the era of Russian interference in our country. Liberal Democrats stand ready to support a special extended session of Parliament to immediately pass the necessary legislation.”

Earlier, Mr Johnson said the UK “cannot and will not just look away” at Russia’s “hideous and barbaric” attack on Ukraine.

The PM said President Vladimir Putin had launched a “vast invasion by land, by sea and by air” without provocation.

He said the UK and allies will launch a “massive package” of sanctions to “hobble” Russia’s economy.

In a pre-recorded TV statement, Mr Johnson stressed that Ukraine was “not some faraway country of which we know little”.

“We have Ukrainian friends in this country, neighbours, co-workers. Ukraine is a country that for decades has enjoyed freedom and democracy and the right to choose its own destiny,” he said.

The prime minister said the UK and the world could not allow that freedom “just to be snuffed out”.

As a result, the UK and its allies would agree a “massive package of economic sanctions” in a bid to “hobble” the Russian economy, Mr Johnson said, before warning that the West would need to cease its dependence on Russian oil and gas.

“Our mission is clear: diplomatically, politically, economically and eventually militarily, this hideous and barbaric venture of Vladimir Putin must end in failure,” he said.

Ukrainians hold a protest against the Russian invasion of Ukraine outside Downing Street There are around 35,000 Ukrainian-born people living in the UK, according to the most-recent ONS data.

Meanwhile the head of the Western defensive alliance Nato, Jens Stoltenberg, condemned the invasion as a “blatant violation” of international law and said he is calling a virtual summit of alliance leaders on Friday to discuss the “serious threat” to security in the region.

“This is a grave moment for the security of Europe. Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified attack on Ukraine is putting countless lives at risk,” he said.

In a pre-dawn TV statement on Thursday, President Putin said Russia did not plan to occupy Ukraine, but demanded its soldiers lay down their weapons, before warning that Moscow’s response would be “instant” if anyone tried to take on Russia.

READ MORE: UK to stop Russia selling sovereign debt in London

READ MORE: UK inflation rises at fastest rate in 30 years