Categories
-Top News Columns UK News

Tories may never recover

The choice of either Robert Jenrick or Kemi Badenoch could prove that those predicting doom may not be wrong, writes Mihir Bose

The choice of Tory MPs to make the Tory leadership race one between Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick could make the Tories like the Republicans in the US or right-wing parties of Europe.

Donald Trump may win power but his Republican party is so far removed from the country club Republican party that has dominated American politics that many of the old Republicans are voting for Kamala Harris. On the continent the traditional right-wing parties have been even more marginalised.

However, to write of the Tories always seems a bit premature. In 1997 after Tony Blair’s victory Geoffrey Wheatcroft wrote The Strange Death of Tory England taking his cue from a famous book  written in 1935, The Strange Death of Liberal England by George Dangerfield. That book was prophetic because the Liberals as a party of government did disappear and have only been in power once as a junior coalition partner of David Cameron’s first government. Even that proved such a disaster that they were nearly wiped out in the next elections. The Conservatives, in contrast, not only survived the Blair wave but returned to power with such vengeance that it has taken Labour fourteen years to regain power.

But the choice of either Jenrick or Badenoch could prove that those predicting doom may not be wrong.

Jenrick is clearly going for the anti-immigrant vote but while this has appeal elections are decided by how people see governments perform in delivering on the economy, NHS, welfare, public services.

Badenoch’s decision is to fight the culture wars. Culture war has taken over from political correctness as another word that conceals its true meaning. Some years ago when Calcutta became Kolkata and Bombay, Mumbai people said this was political correctness. I pointed out Bengalis had always pronounced Calcutta as Kolkata and Mumbai was the name the Kohli fisherman called the city. There is after all a great temple in Mumbai called Mumbadevi. I grew up in Mumbai hearing Maharashtrian demonstrators going down Flora Fountain shouting Mumbai Amachi, Mumbai is ours, demanding the creation of the state of Maharashtra. Indeed during one demonstration outside our house I saw the police fire on a crowd and kill a boy, I remember his body naked to the waist bathed in red blood, the first dead body I had seen. Culture wars, like political correctness, are polite words meant to say how dare you interfere with the world our European ancestors created?

Badenoch, of Nigerian origin, was born here but lived in Nigeria as a child and told the Times that her upbringing in Nigeria showed her the danger of identity politics. “Human beings will always find a difference. I grew up in a place where everybody was black, but there were different languages, there were different cultures. And you still had the same sort of vicious hatred for people who looked exactly the same, but they might dress differently or have a different religion”. Countries need a “dominant shared identity”. In the UK you had to be British. “Watering that down and encouraging everybody to find a way to split into different groups is actually quite dangerous. And I’ve seen more and more of that happening here in a way it wasn’t 30 years ago”

What she did not say was that Nigeria was created by British colonial rulers when Africa  was described as the dark continent which had no history before the Europeans arrived with their civilising mission. Not to acknowledge that history means a vital part of British history is being censored constructing a sham Britishness.

This is, of course ,a pan-European thing and is well demonstrated in the whole debate about the environment. It is wonderfully analysed by the historian Sunil Amrith in The Burning Earth (Allen Lane £30) which looks at the environmental history of the last 500 years but reinterprets a history previously been seen from a Euro and anthropocentric viewpoint into a global viewpoint.

The Chinese in the 15th century then the mightiest power did not want to expand and paid the price when the Europeans came knocking on their doors. There is the story of Madeira the Atlantic island which became the largest producer of sugar in the world just as 12.5 million humans were enslaved and transported across the Atlantic between 1492 and 1866. In Madeira vast expansive land was turned over to growing a single crop. “There was nothing unprecedented in the speed with which the forest of Madeira were razed by the new settlers. “To exhaust the land” was the imperative of Chinese provincial governors in Ming and Quing times. But their aim was always to secure food for a growing population. Investors in Portuguese sugar ventures wanted something else- they wanted to extract the maximum profit in the shortest time”.

He also links the British bringing railways to India, something the British are very proud of, with even more famines taking place because the railways constructed to transport British troops did not reach remote areas. In the 1970s India’s National Sample Survey found that still 72% of all journeys in rural India were made on foot. The British absolved themselves of any responsibility for the famines blaming it on Indian society and even today cannot accept any blame for the second world war famine that killed three million Bengalis in the worst 20th century famine in south Asian history.

But I do not suppose Badenoch would read it as it would not help promote her idea of Britishness which she hopes will win her power. Should the Tories buy her very selective view of Britishness this time they could become marginalised.

Mihir Bose is the author of Thank You Mr Crombie Lessons in Guilt and Gratitude to the British.

Categories
-Top News Politics UK News

‘Starmer Faces Reality’

The working people, the phrase Starmer and Reeves always use, do not have friends who would give them such gifts. By accepting these gifts Starmer, Raynor and Reeves put themselves on a pedestal high above the working people and in a very different class … writes Mihir Bose

It was not meant to be like this. Keir Starmer had won office promising change, and we were told that the changes would be so welcome we would feel we are living in a new country which was infinitely better than the grubby one left behind by fourteen years of Tory rule. Yet three months into his government many now feel that the change Starmer talks about is not change for the better but either no change or something much worse. We are not quite at the stage where we are saying Come Back Rishi, all is forgiven but we do not feel like saying how wonderful Keir is.

When we should excitingly be discussing how the country can improve and how we can get growth going which will mean more money in our pockets we are wondering about the wonderful presents Starmer, and his wife have had. It makes you feel that the Starmers are enjoying their own private Christmas long before Santa has even got up to get his sledges ready.

So how did we get to this state? For a start we live in an age where we expect our politicians to be more open about their lives and also expect them to maintain standards in public life that their predecessors never did. Take gifts. A few days ago, I met a very distinguished former politician of this country at a party. I mentioned to him how in the past I had never worried about the clothes the Prime Minister was wearing or where he got his glasses from. He smiled and said well Churchill got presents and so did Disraeli. Indeed, they did and Lloyd George, one of this country’s greatest prime ministers, was corrupt. What is more his predecessor Herbert Asquith, just as the first world war was starting, had an affair with Venetia Stanley, a pretty young woman. He made love to her on the back seat of a sedan while being driven round London, showing her secret, highly confidential, documents which he then tossed  out of the car leading to an inquiry as to how these secret papers were being found on the London streets. We know about all this from Robert Harris’s new novel Precipice.

Harris, an excellent journalist, bases his novels on historical events. In what I consider his best novel, The Fatherland,  he gave a very interesting twist to history, imagining what might have happened had the Nazis won the war. This novel is based on having been given access to an archive of letters, telegrams and official documents in the possession of the Bonham-Carter family. Many of them are reprinted in the novel, several for the first time. The Guardian reviewer said Harris has left the framework of history intact, his only invention being the character of a detective to act as the envoy of the writer and reader. That Harris had constructed a quite brilliant novel about a clandestine love affair.

Now here is the difference between our age and that bygone age. Then this affair was known but only to a small circle of people and they would never have revealed it. Now  should something like that happen it will be difficult to keep it secret. It will soon be on social media, television news and in the printed media.

So, observe how the fact that Lord Alli , a Labour peer, gave clothes and spectacles to the Prime Minister and clothes to his wife emerged like a slow drip. And with no Dowing Street plumber able to fix this leak, or even perhaps want to, more stories emerged of gifts like allowing Starmer to use Alli’s luxury flat during the election. Ali also gave gifts to Angela Raynor, the deputy Prime Minister  who used his flat in New York where she stayed with a friend. Rachel Reeves got clothes which came from a friend of hers. We also learnt that Starmer had had use of a box at Emirates to watch his beloved Arsenal.

Now there is nothing corrupt about all this. Starmer, Raynor, Reeves declared these gifts. But observe the effect of this stories. All three have said they will no longer receive gifts of clothes. But the fact that they accepted these gifts  mean they , seeking to run this country, showed an astonishing political naivete. Starmer has justified it was necessary to use Ali’s flat in order to allow his “boy” to concentrate on his GCSEs and not be distracted by the election. Starmer justified his Arsenal box by saying security reasons meant he could not use his Arsenal season tickets. Reeves said she accepted the clothes because she never has time to go shopping and the friend was helping her out.

However, the working people, the phrase Starmer and Reeves always use, do not have friends who would give them such gifts. By accepting these gifts Starmer, Raynor and Reeves put themselves on a pedestal high above the working people and in a very different class.

The fact is we live in an age, unlike the age of Churchill and Lloyd George, when we expect our politicians to be exactly like us. Starmer and Reeves and the Labour government are constantly telling us hard times are coming. Fasten the seat belts. We need to go through the valleys of deprivation before we see the sunny lands of prosperity. If that is the case then we expect the politicians to fasten their seat belts as well. Not sawn round in luxury while we cut back. That shows there are two worlds one for the politicians and one for us. There may always have been two worlds but in the past our fathers and grandfathers accepted there would be. We don’t. Politicians of our age cannot expect people to make sacrifices when they are not making them as well.

But there is another aspect to this story that is, in some ways, even more worrying. Why did this story of Starmer and his gifts emerge? First we had a story of Lord Ali having a Downing Street pass, something that is unusual and raised questions as to why. Then we started hearing of the gifts that were being given. This was followed by stories of disquiet in Downing Street about how Sue Gray, Starmer’s chief of staff, was earning more than him. That Labour party members who had acted as advisers for MPs when they were in opposition had been offered salaries lower than what their Tory counterparts had got when they worked for Tory ministers. The rewards they expected in helping Labour get to power after fourteen years had not come their way. Instead a select few had profited. All this has bred discontent. Is it any surprise that there are leaks from Downing Street about Starmer and his gifts.

What we have here is a dysfunctional government. When Starmer came to power I felt that while he did not have the charisma of a Blair he would be a good technocrat who would know how to run the government as he had run the CPS one of the biggest organisations in this country. The evidence so far suggests that this assumption may not be right. This is what is most worrying. Starmer is not a word smith. He will never utter a phrase like Blair’s tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime which will resonate. But the expectation has been he would gather competent people round him and give us a government that works. Now it would seem Starmer’s managerial capacity has been exaggerated. I hope I am wrong. But if he cannot manage his Downing Street operation how can he manage the country?

Starmer needs to show quickly that he can be a good manager otherwise it will be difficult to believe that his slogan change means anything.

(Mihir Bose is the author of Thank You Mr Crombie, Lessons in Guilt and Gratitude to the British.  Order my new book https://www.amazon.co.uk/Thank-You-Mr-Crombie-Gratitude/dp/1911723006 )

Categories
-Top News Europe UK News

Labour got more donations than other parties combined

The Conservatives’ biggest source of donations was a lottery, which raised £225,000 in total throughout the campaign. Labour’s biggest donor was Lord David Sainsbury, who gave the party £2.5m…reports Asian Lite News

Labour declared more donations than all other parties combined during the general election campaign, taking more than £9.5m in total.

Final totals from the elections watchdog show the Conservatives raised just under £1.9m, less than a tenth of what they raised during the 2019 election, when the party declared over £19m.

The Conservatives’ biggest source of donations was a lottery, which raised £225,000 in total throughout the campaign. Labour’s biggest donor was Lord David Sainsbury, who gave the party £2.5m.

The figures cover donations from when Parliament was shut on 30 May up to polling day on 4 July. Lord Sainsbury, the former chairman of the Sainsbury’s supermarket chain, was the biggest donor of the campaign. He previously served as a science and innovation minister in Tony Blair’s government.

In total, more than £8m of Labour’s donations came from 10 sources. They included: two unions, the former Autoglass boss Gary Lubner, hedge fund managers Martin Taylor and Stuart Roden, the sculptor Antony Gormley, the production company Toledo Productions, tech investor Danny Luhde-Thompson and former professional poker player Derek Webb, who founded the Campaign for Fairer Gambling.

The National Conservative Draws Society, a weekly lottery licensed by the Gambling Commission, contributed a total of £225,000 to the Conservatives over the course of the campaign. It was the largest amount declared by the party from any one source, according to analysis of Electoral Commission data.

Labour and the Liberal Democrats also have their own lotteries. The biggest Liberal Democrat donor of the campaign was Adam Management Holdings, a management consultancy and real estate company run by Safwan Adam. The company provided almost £480,000 to the Liberal Democrats and also donated £20,000 to the Green Party.

The biggest donor to Reform UK was Britain Means Business, a company with deputy leader Richard Tice as a director. The company run by the new MP for Boston and Skegness donated £500,000 in total to the party during the campaign. Businessman Zia Yusuf was the second biggest Reform UK donor, providing £200,000. Since the election, he has become the party’s chairman.

Labour received significantly less from trade unions than it did in the 2015, 2017 and 2019 elections. In 2019, the party declared £5m from unions. In 2024, it was £2.4m, with £1.49m coming from the public sector union Unison and the rest from six other unions.

Unite, a major union backer in 2019, did not donate to Labour during the 2024 campaign. It refused to endorse the party’s general election manifesto, saying it did not go far enough on protecting workers’ rights and jobs in the oil and gas industry. There were over 130 different donors in the data, ranging from individuals to companies and unions.

Parties were obliged to submit weekly reports of any donations and loans over £11,180 received between 30 May 2024 and polling day. In previous general elections, the threshold was £7,500 but this was increased in January 2024.

ALSO READ-Sunak urged to stay on as Tory leader until Nov

Categories
-Top News UK News

Sunak urged to stay on as Tory leader until Nov

The Conservatives were reduced to just 121 MPs at the general election, their worst result in history…reports Asian Lite News

Rishi Sunak has been urged to stay on as Conservative leader until November amid divisions within the party over how long the contest to replace him should take.

Shadow foreign secretary Andrew Mitchell said the former prime minister’s instinct “is almost certainly to go” but more time was needed for potential successors to make their case.

The view is at odds with other senior figures who fear a protracted contest would leave a vacuum for Labour and Reform UK to capitalise on. Mitchell told Times Radio on Monday: “An interim leader is not, in my view, the best option.

“The best option is to seek to persuade Rishi to remain. It’s not an enormously long time in the scope of things. It’s probably ’til mid to end November.” He added: “I think his instinct is almost certainly to go. I hope that he won’t.”

Mitchell said the Conservative Party conference at the end of September would be a good time for “a debate to take place” about who should take over the party. He pointed to the example of Michael Howard, who delayed his departure as Conservative leader for six months after an election defeat in 2005.

“I think we should play it long,” Mitchell said. “Following the very significant defeat of the Conservative Party, we need to adopt a modest profile in this respect. I would expect also that the party conference, when people will have a look at what the Conservative Party is then saying, is the right time for this debate to take place.”

He added: “I very much hope that what the party will decide to do is to mirror what Michael Howard did in 2005 and allow the party conference the space for candidates who are offering themselves to say what they would do… Members of Parliament can then take a view as a result of that showcasing.”

The Conservatives were reduced to just 121 MPs at the general election, their worst result in history.

Sunak accepted responsibility for the scale of the defeat and said he would step down as Tory leader once the formal arrangements for choosing his successor were in place.

The rules and timeline will be decided by the 1922 Committee of backbench MPs, who elected their new chairman last week. While several Tory MPs have called for a period of self-reflection before choosing a successor, others fear this could be even more damaging to the party’s public perception. Long contest risks ‘turning off the public even more’

Should the contest drag on, Sunak may be unwilling to stay, forcing the party to appoint another leader in the interim. Lord Houchen, the Tory mayor of Tees Valley, has said the party should not “navel gaze for too long”, suggesting it would “turn off the public even more”.

He told the BBC a protracted contest “feeds into that perception that we’re more concerned about the ongoings of the Conservative Party rather than what the public care about, which is: how do we help improve their lives”. No candidate is yet to officially declare they will run for the Tory leadership.

ALSO READ-Starmer meets Biden on NATO sidelines

Categories
-Top News Asia News Nepal

Nepal’s RSP delays exit from Prachanda govt

Rashtriya Swatantra Party ministers had reached Dahal’s residence to tender their resignations but changed their decision after meeting him….reports Asian Lite News

In a change of stance, Nepal’s Rashtriya Swatantra Party (RSP) has decided not to immediately walk out of the government led by Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’, who is battling a political crisis following withdrawal of support by CPN-UML.

Rashtriya Swatantra Party ministers had reached Dahal’s residence on Thursday to tender their resignations but changed their decision after meeting him.

“We went to meet Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal carrying resignation letters. He apprised us that he will exercise his constitutional rights and face the parliament. We also asked him to take the floor test soon and our ministers didn’t tender resignation,” Santosh Pariyar, chief whip of the party, told ANI over the phone.

Pariyar along with four ministers and vice president of RSP went to Dahal’s residence to give resignations.

Dahal is leading a minority government after his major ally, CPN-UML, walked out of the government on Wednesday.

With the expiration of the 24-hour deadline given on Tuesday, the Communist Party of Nepal-Unified Marxist Leninist (CPN-UML), the key ally of the Dahal-led government walked out of the government. The party had given a one-day ultimatum to Prime Minister Dahal to step down from the post which it called “a respectful exit.”

On Wednesday (July 3), eight ministers from CPN-UML on board the cabinet of Dahal formed on March 4 earlier this year, tendered resignations before the Prime Minister at his residence in Baluwatar. The ministers had reached Balkot, the residence of UML Chairman KP Sharma Oli and headed for Baluwatar.

“We have resigned and submitted the letter to the Prime Minister a while ago. All the 8 ministers on board the cabinet from the CPN-UML have resigned informing the Prime Minister that we no longer are part of this government and withdraw our support,”

Jwalakumari Sah, the former minister for Agriculture told ANI over phone call from PM residence, Baluwatar.

The UML and Congress on Monday night agreed to form a new government. Oli would lead a new national consensus and government for a year and a half. For the remaining term, Nepal’s former PM Sher Bahadur Deuba will be the prime minister.

Dahal expressed reluctance to resign immediately. The office-bearers meeting of the CPN (Maoist Centre) held in Baluwatar on Tuesday had decided that the Prime Minister will not tender his resignation but instead face a trust vote in Parliament within 30 days since the retraction of support.

On Wednesday, the Nepali Congress formally endorsed the agreement reached with the CPN-UML on the formation of a new coalition. A central work execution committee meeting of the party held at party President Sher Bahadur Deuba’s residence in Budhanilkantha endorsed the deal reached between the top leaders of the two largest parties.

In the deal, leaders from the two largest parties have reached an understanding to lead the governments in the remaining around three-and-half-year tenure of the present parliament on a rotation basis.

“The meeting concludes that it would be appropriate for the prime minister to pave the way for the formation of a new national consensus government as, following the agreement between Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML, a clear majority in the House of Representatives is in favour of forming the government under the leadership of KP Sharma Oli,” reads a statement issued after the meeting.

The meeting also expressed commitment to implement the agreement. “The meeting expresses its determination to implement the agreement reached between the Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML regarding leading governments on a rotation basis to protect national interests, control corruption, ensure good governance, the development, maintain political stability, amending the constitution to strengthen the federal democratic republican system and inclusiveness and to strengthen the economy.”

As per the midnight agreement between Sher Bahadur Deuba from Nepali Congress and KP Sharma Oli from CPN-UML on Tuesday, a committee is also formed to suggest amendments to the election procedures and the constitution under the leadership of former Chief Justice Kalyan Shrestha.

In the overnight agreement, the largest and the second largest party in the parliament drafted a constitutional amendment agreement where it was stated that the Vice President would be made the chairman of the National Assembly. Leaders from the Congress and the UML informed President Ram Chandra Paudel about the change in coalition.

During the meeting, the leaders informed the President about activating Section 76 (2) to form a new government in case the incumbent Prime Minister fails to win the vote of confidence after UML withdraws its support. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Nepal jails ‘Buddha boy’ for 10 years over child sex abuse

Categories
-Top News UK News

Sunak urges right-wing voters to stand by his party

Farage, one of Britain’s most recognizable and divisive politicians, has spent decades railing against the establishment and the European Union, and has in recent years campaigned for Donald Trump in the United States…reports Asian Lite News

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Monday urged voters on the political right to stick with his Conservatives at this week’s election, saying a huge win for Labour would be bad for the country and its democracy.

Appearing to all but concede defeat before Thursday’s election, Sunak appealed to Conservative voters, some of whom have been shifting to Nigel Farage’s right-wing Reform UK in protest at his Conservative government, to prevent what he called a Labour “super majority.”

The Conservatives look set to be kicked out of office after 14 turbulent years, marked by Britain’s vote to leave the European Union in 2016 and the cost of living crisis that followed the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Opinion polls have consistently given Keir Starmer’s center-left Labour Party an around 20-point lead, with support for Reform potentially splitting the center-right vote and the centrist Liberal Democrats further draining Conservative support.

“If there is an unchecked, unaccountable Labour Party in power with a super majority, think what that would mean for everyone,” Sunak told voters at a rally.

“Once you’ve given Labour a blank check, you won’t be able to get it back, and that means that your taxes are going up … it’s in their DNA.”

Farage, one of Britain’s most recognizable and divisive politicians, has spent decades railing against the establishment and the European Union, and has in recent years campaigned for Donald Trump in the United States.

SPLIT THE RIGHT

He entered the election in early June — his eighth attempt at winning a seat in the Westminster parliament — vowing to supplant the Conservatives as the main party of the right.

Polls appear to show that Reform’s support peaked in the second half of June, shortly before Farage said the West provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Some of his candidates and supporters have been dropped for racist or inappropriate remarks.

While Britain’s electoral system means Reform may win millions of votes, the party is unlikely to win more than a handful of parliamentary seats. But that could be enough to split the right in many areas and hand victory to Labour.

Reform said on Monday its membership had doubled from 30,000 to 60,000 in a month, and that donations would help it fund an advertising campaign through the last week.

“It is humbling but also very telling that they are prepared to back their faith in Reform UK with hard-earned cash and I thank each and every one of them,” Farage said in a statement.

Britain will likely elect a center-left government as much of Europe swings right, including in France where Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally won the first round of a parliamentary election on Sunday.

With polls showing many voters are undecided, Sunak made a final plea for people to limit Labour’s power if it gets into government, saying: “I say to every Conservative: don’t surrender to Labour, fight for every vote, fight for our values, and fight for our vision of Britain.”

ALSO READ-Big majority better for the country, claims Starmer  

Categories
-Top News Asia News PAKISTAN

PML-N Faces Flak From Own Legislators Over ‘Tax-Heavy’ Budget

The legislators slammed Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb for presenting a “tax-loaded and International Montery Fund (IMF)-dictated budget”.

The ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) faced an unprecedented backlash in the National Assembly with lawmakers from even the treasury benches joining their opposition counterparts in lashing out at the government over the federal budget, Dawn reported.

The legislators on Friday slammed Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb for presenting a “tax-loaded and International Montery Fund (IMF)-dictated budget”.

The second day of the budget debate yesterday was also marked by fierce criticism of the government by the members from both sides over the absence of the ministers, especially the finance minister, from proceedings.

The PPP, a key partner in the ruling coalition, continued its protest by only having a “token participation”, as its members attended the session but didn’t participate in the debate as a mark of protest over the alleged violation of an agreement reached with the PML-N at the time of the formation of the government after the February elections and for “not consulting” it on the preparation of the budget.

The boycott of the debate by the PPP came despite reports that the issues between the two parties had been settled after a meeting between Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Thursday evening

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari

It is pertinent to note that five PML-N members also participated in the debate on Friday, but none of them supported the government’s economic policies and almost all of them complained that they were also “not consulted” by the finance minister and bureaucrats while preparing the budget.

Taking part in the debate, the opposition members belonging to the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) took the government to task over the alleged “political victimization” of the party and demanded the immediate release of PTI’s founder and former premier Imran Khan, as well as other party activists who had been jailed in different cases.

Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif also attended the sitting for a few minutes, but most of the time the front treasury rows remained empty, drawing criticism from the lawmakers from both sides of the aisle.

The lawmakers grilled the finance minister over indirect taxation and for putting more burden on the salaried class, besides imposing sales tax on each and every item, including stationery items, books, packed milk, and medical equipment.

Most of the leaders termed it an “IMF-dictated budget” which, they said, had been presented only to appease foreign masters and to get more loans, Dawn reported. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Milk prices surge as Pakistan faces high inflation

Categories
-Top News INDIA 2024 India News

Allies Seek Plum Posts

While TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu has taken a firm stand that he wants to play a key role in the Modi 3.0 govt, JD(U) wanted shortcomings in the ‘Agnipath’ scheme to the discussed in detail…reports Asian Lite News

Dispelling rumours that he was considering feelers from the INDI Alliance, Telugu Desam Party chief Chandrababu Naidu attended the NDA meeting in Delhi. Pictures of the meet showed the Andhra leader being seated right next to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The TDP is the second-largest party in the NDA with 16 MPs.

Top party sources said Naidu has taken a firm stand that he wants to play a key role in the Modi 3.0 government. He is also learnt to have given the BJP brass a list of demands. These include the Lok Sabha Speaker’s post and at least five portfolios for the regional party.

The TDP is keen on the Speaker’s position because it comes with immense power and access, and the Chair will play a crucial role in case of a hung Parliament. Late GMC Balayogi from the party had served as Speaker in the A B Vajpayee government from 1998 to 2002.

A TDP MP said the party wants rural development, housing and urban affairs, ports & shipping, road transport & highways, and Jal Shakti ministries. It is also keen to have a junior minister in the finance ministry as the state is in dire need of funds.

As Naidu wants to resume development of Amaravati as Andhra capital, the urban affairs portfolio will come in handy. Similarly, he needs the rural development ministry to fulfil his promise of developing rural infrastructure in the state. Three industrial corridors pass through the state; hence, the demand for road transport and highways ministry.

The state has four ports under development, which can be completed fast with the help of the ports & shipping ministry. Naidu hopes to complete the Polavaram multi-purpose irrigation project with the help of the Jal Shakti ministry. However, he may not insist on this portfolio owing to conflict of interest: Andhra Pradesh has river water disputes with Telangana, Karnataka, and Odisha.

Agniveer scheme should be discussed, says JD(U)

JD(U) senior leader KC Tyagi on Thursday said that his party had offered unconditional support to the Bharatiya Janata Party-led NDA but wanted the shortcomings in the ‘Agnipath’ scheme to the discussed in detail.

“A section of voters has been upset over the Agniveer scheme. Our party wants those shortcomings which have been questioned by the public to be discussed in detail and removed,” he said

The Agnipath Scheme in the Indian Armed Forces is a scheme where selected candidates will be enrolled as Agniveers for a four-year period. Based on organisational requirements and policies promulgated by the Armed Forces, Agniveers after completing their engagement period will be offered an opportunity to apply for enrolment in the permanent cadre. Of these upto 25% of Agniveers will be selected to be enrolled in the Armed Forces as a regular cadre.

Meanwhile, JDU spokesperson KC Tyagi also spoke on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), which has been one of the poll promises of the BJP. He signalled that the JDU is not against the UCC but it should be discussed with the stakeholders.

“We are not against the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), but we reckon that it should be discussed with all the stakeholders including the states, Chief Ministers and political parties”, he said.

The JDU leader also advocated for a caste census saying that PM Narendra Modi was not opposed to it.

Tyagi stated, “A caste census is being demanded by all. Bihar has paved the way for it. Even the Prime Minister did not oppose the caste census, so we will pursue it.”

KC Tyagi also spoke on special status for Bihar, which has been a demand of the party and Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar.

“There is no pre-condition. There is unconditional support. But Bihar should be given a special status. That is something which we have in our heart… ” said KC Tyagi.

As per the results announced by the Election Commission of India on Tuesday, the BJP won 240 seats and along with its allies, it stands at 293 seats. Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP and Nitish Kumar’s JDU, having won 16 and 12 seats respectively in their respective states, have extended support to the NDA.

The INDIA bloc has 234 MPs in the new parliament with the Congress having won 99 seats. (ANI)

ALSO READ-Albanese Dials Modi, Hails Lok Sabha Win

Categories
-Top News UK News

Over 100 business leaders back Labour  

The letter, signed by current and former chief executives in retail, advertising, travel and finance, said Labour had shown it had changed and should be given a chance to shape the country’s future…reports Asian Lite News

More than 100 business leaders have given their support to Britain’s opposition Labour Party before a July 4 election, saying the country needs to end the instability and stagnation that has dogged the economy.

Rishi Sunak’s governing Conservatives have typically been the party of big business but Labour’s finance policy chief Rachel Reeves has spent years courting business owners in a bid to show her party can be trusted to run the economy.

The letter, signed by current and former chief executives in retail, advertising, travel and finance, said Labour had shown it had changed and should be given a chance to shape the country’s future.

“We, as leaders and investors in British business, believe that it is time for a change,” the letter said.

“We are in urgent need of a new outlook to break free from the stagnation of the last decade and we hope by taking this public stand we might persuade others of that need too.” Labour will hope the endorsement shows that it is no longer the party of Starmer’s predecessor, veteran left-wing lawmaker Jeremy Corbyn, who campaigned at the last election in 2019 to renationalise some key assets and hike taxes on the rich.

Leaders who signed the letter include the boss of retailer Iceland, the chairman of JD Sports, the head of the UK arm of ad giant WPP, the former CEO of Aston Martin and the founder of a children’s company that once included Sunak’s wife Akshata Murty as an investor.

Starmer’s Labour have held an around 20-point lead in polls for almost a year. It has accused the government of 14 years of economic mismanagement, failing to give business the stability it craves and leaving people worse off.

Britain’s economic performance since the coronavirus pandemic has been the weakest among the Group ofSeven economies with the exception of Germany, weighed down by high levels of debt and stuck in a rut of slow growth.

Reeves will say later on Tuesday the endorsement shows that Labour can bring business investment back to Britain. “Our plans for growth are built on partnership with business,” she will say.

Sunak’s Conservatives say they have had to steer the economy through the twin shocks of Covid-19 and the energy spike that followed Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. A recent drop in inflation, they say, shows that the economy is back on track.

After an underwhelming start to the election campaign, Sunak has proposed tax cuts for millions of pensioners – the section of the electorate that is most likely to vote Conservative.

The new proposal will cost 2.4 billion pounds ($3.1 billion)a year by 2029/30 and be funded through government efforts to clamp down on tax avoidance and evasion, the party said.

Rayner promises to fight to end Gaza’s suffering

Angela Rayner, the deputy leader of the UK’s Labour Party, has promised that her party will do everything in its power to ease the suffering in Gaza as it bids to regain Muslim voters’ support, a leaked video surfacing on social media has revealed.

The footage was first reported by the political blog Guido Fawkes, which claimed to have obtained the leaked tape from a meeting in Ashton-under-Lyne, Rayner’s constituency.

The MP is seen appealing to voters upset with the party’s stance on Israel’s assault on Gaza, The Telegraph reported. Rayner — claiming she worked “day and night” to get three British doctors out of Rafah and is now attempting to secure aid for the enclave — said: “I promise you, the Labour Party, including myself, is doing everything we can, because nobody wants to see what’s happening.”

She acknowledged the party’s current inability to halt the fighting, admitting that Labour’s influence would be “limited,” even if it came to power after July’s general election. Rayner added: “Only last week the Labour Party were supporting the ICC (International Criminal Court). The Conservatives didn’t support the ICC, so with this general election on that issue, we can’t affect anything when we’re not in government.

“And I’ll be honest with you, if Labour gets into government, we are limited. I will be honest. I’m not going to promise you … because (Joe) Biden, who’s the US (president), who has way more influence, has only got limited influence in that. And Qatar, Saudi Arabia, all of these people, we are all working to stop what’s happening at the moment; we want to see that. So I promise you, that’s what we want to see.”

Rayner also promised that, if Labour was elected, the party would recognize Palestinian statehood.

She added: “If Labour gets into power, we will recognize Palestine. I will push not only to recognize … there is nothing to recognize at the moment, sadly. It’s decimated. We have to rebuild Palestine; we have to rebuild Gaza. That takes more than just recognizing it.”

Gaza has been a divisive issue for Labour since Oct. 7, with reports revealing that Muslim voters have abandoned the party as a result of what they perceive as its politicians enabling the war.

ALSO READ-Labour rejects Tory’s National Service plan

Categories
Columns India News Politics

MUMBAI DIARY: The Future Hinges on Results

Uddhav Thackeray’s popularity graph has grown up tremendously in the state and also at national level. As political observers feels that Maharashtra and Mumbai can play a crucial role of “King Maker” in the formation of the government … writes VINOD RAGHAVAN

INDIA’s financial capital – Mumbai is all set to decide the fate of three heavyweight political leaders’ their future on June 4th.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is eyeing to break the record of India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru by occupying the country’s top post for the third consecutive term, is not leaving any stone unturned. While, his close ally turned bitter foe Uddhav Thackeray, who has been bruised and badly hurted for breaking his Shiv Sena, which was founded by his late father, who is popularly addressed as Hinduhriday Samrat Balasaheb Thackeray, in his home turf Mumbai capital of Maharashtra state.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Uddhav Thackeray interacting during the Dwishatabdi Mahotsav (200 Years) of Mumbai Samachar, in Mumbai. (File Photo: ANI)

Political veteran 84-year-old, Sharad Pawar, is all set to take revenge against Modi-led BJP for engineering split in his Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and dividing his joint family, with Ajit Pawar taking away his party symbol of “Wrist Watch” and also the party symbol, which was founded by senior Pawar after leaving Congress party.

Mumbai, has six Lok Sabha seats, which is believed to be the stronghold of the united Shiv Sena. After the split in Sena led by Eknath Shinde with 40 MLAs and 13 MPs, the power equation shifted to the Shinde faction supported by BJP in Maharashtra. This is the time for Uddhav Thackeray to flex his muscle and to show Modi-Shah and also to the Election Commission of India, that the party cadres and the people of Mumbai and Maharashtra are with him and his is the real Shiv Sena.

Shiv Sena was founded way back in 1960s by Balasaheb Thackeray to fight for the causes of Marathi Asmita (Maharashtra’s pride) and to regain the Maharashtrian pride, Uddhav has toured every nook and corner of Maharashtra with his alliance partners NCP-Sharad Pawar group, Indian National Congress with other smaller parties, addressed in all the 48 Lok Sabha constituencies with huge rallies and systematically played the victim card vigorously, which has gone down well with the masses of Mumbai and Maharashtra.

Then Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray speaks during the floor test in assembly, Eknath Shinde, Jayant Patil and Aditya Thackeray is also seen. (File Photo: ANI)

Many old-timers from Mumbai and neighbouring Thane district feels that Uddhav has been back-stabbed by BJP-led by Modi-Shah. Shiv Sena which helped BJP for nearly three decades to grow from 2 MP party with Vajpayee and Advani at the helm, today they have become too big for their shoes.

In desperation, Modi addressed around 25 rallies in Maharashtra and Mumbai, also held a Road Show in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, which shows his panic. Modi might have realised Uddhav’s importance, thus recently, he told selected journalists that “I will be the first to reach Uddhav for any help” but while addressing public rallies, he takes potshot on Uddhav and also calls his Sena as “Nakli Sena” (Duplicate Sena) 

Earlier, in 2014 and 2019 BJP with united Shiv Sena the combine had sweeped all the six Mumbai seats and also the neighboring Thane and Kalyan-Dombivali seats were in their kitty. While, the alliance had bagged 42 seats from Maharashtra in 2014 and 2019.

Interestingly, political observers feels that Uddhav, got good support from the people of Maharashtra and also Muslim communities are whole-heartedly supporting him, as they have seen him in discharging his duties as Chief Minister of Maharashtra. Communists were Sena’s bitter rivals for decades, are also supporting Uddhav openly and sharing dias in many of their strongholds, with a sole aim of stopping Modi to come back to power for the third time, as they fear that he will change the Constitution and will sell off all the government properties to his good friends.

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge in conversation with Nationalist Congress Party (NCP-SCP) chief Sharad Pawar during the INDIA bloc joint press conference, in Mumbai. (ANI Photo)

NCP patriarch Sharad Pawar, is also facing the same problem, as his nephew Ajit Pawar, ditched him and fielded his wife Sunetra against Supriya Sule, a sitting MP and senior Pawar’s daughter from their stronghold Baramati near Pune.

Modi, who was seen as a new ray of hope in 2014 and 2019 with his charisma and speech, looks like he is fading as he has remained mum on his earlier poll promises of giving every year two crore jobs, bringing black money,  giving Rs15 lakh, price rise of essential commodities. However, he is talking about his vision of 2047 and to make India powerful nation globally.

People burst into laughter to Uddhav Thackeray calling Modi as “Gajini” Aamir Khan’s film, where he forgets and moves ahead with new promises.

Uddhav Thackeray’s popularity graph has grown up tremendously in the state and also at national level. As political observers feels that Maharashtra and Mumbai can play a crucial role of “King Maker” in the formation of the government.

ALSO READ: Close to 9% drop in voter turnout in Maharashtra phase 4 polls