The former PM has branded the Privileges Committee’s findings “deranged” – and his most loyal supporters are set to vote against it…reports Asian Lite News
Conservative MPs are split over whether or not to approve a report condemning Boris Johnson for misleading Parliament over Covid rule-breaking.
The former PM has branded the Privileges Committee’s findings “deranged” – and his most loyal supporters are set to vote against it.
But other Tory MPs are torn about what to do, as Johnson remains popular with many party members. No 10 has not said if Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will attend the vote.
His official spokesman said he would “take the time” to fully consider its findings before Monday, when MPs will vote on its recommendations. The report, which was published on Thursday morning, said the former PM had deliberately misled Parliament over lockdown parties and had committed repeated offences with his denials.
If Johnson had still been in Parliament, MPs would be voting on whether to suspend him for 90 days.
But since he has already stood down, the main punishment available to the committee is to strip him of the parliamentary pass former MPs are normally entitled to hold.
Nevertheless, many Conservatives face a dilemma.
Voting against the recommendations risks alienating local party activists who want Johnson gone – but voting for it risks angering his fans, who believe he has been hounded out of Parliament.
Some MPs may well choose to abstain to keep their distance from the vote.
One former minister told the BBC they were planning to vote for the report but, in a sign of the febrile mood, did not want to say so publicly yet in case “something happens” over the weekend.
Another said: “I think I’m hovering between voting for the report and abstaining, the latter solely because voting for it will rile members.”
One senior party figure said: “The report speaks for itself.” They described the 90-day suspension as “a bit tough, but hey-ho”.
Tim Loughton, MP for East Worthing and Shoreham, said he was likely to support the report, describing the committee as “legitimate” and their conclusions “damning”.
Asked if most Conservatives would follow suit, he said he expected it to pass easily with some abstentions, adding “there will be some of [Johnson’s] dwindling band of loyalists who want to repeat some of the barbs he has thrown at the committee”.
So far 12 Conservatives have publicly criticised the committee
Johnson ally Nadine Dorries suggested Tories who vote for the report should be kicked out of the party
Sir James Duddridge tweeted: “Why not go the full way, put Boris in the stocks and provide rotten food to throw at him?”
Liz Truss told GB News she would not question the integrity of the committee, but added their decision seemed “very harsh”.
Jacob Rees-Mogg said he would “probably” vote against the report, but added that MPs as a whole would be likely to vote in favour. Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the SNP are all expected to support the committee’s findings.
MPs will be able to amend the motion when it comes before the House of Commons on 19 June, which is also Johnson’s 59th birthday.
Lord Caine, who was appointed as a Northern Ireland minister by Boris Johnson in 2019, said he could understand why people might feel angry about Johnson’s conduct, and spoke about his mother’s funeral during the pandemic.
“I had to deliver a eulogy to the nine other people in the chapel and then go home, sit on my own, in her house for the rest of the afternoon,” he said.
“I have never felt so lonely in my life. So I think people might draw their own conclusions about how I feel and I imagine a great many people up and down the country will share those feelings.”
Following a year-long investigation, the seven-person Privileges Committee found Johnson had had “personal knowledge” of Covid-rule breaches in Downing Street but had repeatedly failed to “pro-actively investigate” the facts.
The committee said officials had not advised Johnson that social distancing guidelines were followed at all times, contrary to what he said in the House of Commons at the time.
In key evidence, Martin Reynolds – one of Johnson’s most senior officials – said he had advised the PM against making the claim, questioning whether it was “realistic”.
Johnson announced last Friday that he was standing down as an MP with immediate effect after being shown a draft of the report. A by-election will be held on 20 July in his Uxbridge and South Ruislip constituency.
In an eviscerating statement he branded the committee a “kangaroo court” and its findings “deranged”, accusing Harriet Harman, the Labour chairwoman of the committee, of bias.
The committee said the initial proposed sanction was increased “in light of Mr Johnson’s conduct” in recent days – including breaching confidentiality rules and “being complicit in the campaign of abuse and attempted intimidation of the committee”.
Johnson’s statement was “completely unacceptable”, they said. Responding to the report, Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner said Mr Johnson had “disgraced himself”, and the Liberal Democrats’ Daisy Cooper said he had treated Parliament with “total disdain”. SNP leader Humza Yousaf called it a “dark day” for Westminster.