Categories
-Top News UK News USA

Johnson: Putin May Have Held Back If Trump Were In Office

Boris Johnson has backed Trump’s claim that Putin would not have invaded Ukraine if he had been in the White House, reports Asian Lite News

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson says that US presidential candidate Donald Trump’s “unpredictability” is an asset because it is a form of “deterrence” that keeps foreign leaders off balance.

“All deterrence is based on unpredictability, but it’s also based on strength”, he said in an interview to USA Today.

Taking a very different perspective from many leaders and media, he said, “People say that one of the things that worries people is his unpredictability, right? ‘Oh, he’s unpredictable’. That’s a good thing.”

“It’s good dealing internationally, because foreign leaders are a little nervous about (Trump)”, the Conservative British leader said.

He gave the example of Trump’s claim that Putin would not have invaded Ukraine if he had been in the White House.

“I think it is probably true that Putin would not have done it if he’d been in the White House — the ’22 invasion. I think that feels right to me”, he said.

Johnson was Britain’s foreign secretary from 2016 to 2018 when he became Prime Minister, an office he held till 2022, enabling him to watch both Trump and President Joe Biden at close quarters.

He did not endorse Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris, saying, “This is the decision for the American people.”

He said that unpredictability effectively gets the message across even to allies and recalled Trump at a 2017 NATO summit when Trump was accused of insulting the other leaders and acting churlish.

Trump tore up the prepared speech and “just extemporised this great tirade against everyone.”

His message was that NATO countries should increase their Defence budgets.

“The point was it was pure U.S. policy… but it was done in a totally unconventional way. And people later reported that summit saying, ‘oh, Trump was threatening to leave NATO.’ He wasn’t doing anything of the kind. He was simply enunciating standard American policy and standard British policy about getting the allies to spend more and pay more (for Defence)”, he said.

“He did it in a way that was unconventional”, he added, but “it was good because they did start to pay more.”

Johnson said that Trump’s unconventional style “may offend refined political tastes”, but it has an appeal.

Many European leaders “think it’s kind of uncouth, but I don’t, and it is a terrible thing to admit, but I like it, so shoot me”, he said.

“If he turns up in a garbage truck to satirise his opponent, I like that. That’s my kind of level, OK? And maybe it doesn’t suit more refined political tastes, but I happen to go with it”, he said.

Johnson was referring to Trump turning up in a garbage truck with a trash collector’s vest on Tuesday in Milwaukee after President Joe Biden called his supporters “garbage”.

“People attack populism, but I kind of feel that our system is a great, great system, and it won’t work if you can’t actually address what people want you to fix”, he said.

Regarding the fears that Trump may give up on Ukraine, Johnson said that Trump’s actual record shows otherwise.

He said that Trump, for example, had given Ukraine Javelin missiles, and “if you look at the actual evidence of what he did, it was actually in sharp contrast to the relative inertia under the previous Democrat administration.”

ALSO READ: Voting ends in Conservative leadership contest

Categories
-Top News Politics USA

Biden’s gaffe gives Trump a boost

His remarks, made in response to a comedian’s derogatory comment about Puerto Rico at a Donald Trump rally, have opened a door for Trump to shift focus away from his own controversial campaign tactics…reports Asian Lite News

President Joe Biden has inadvertently thrust him back into the political spotlight just a week before the US Presidential Elections following his comment during a virtual event defending Puerto Ricans, CNN reported on Wednesday.

His remarks, made in response to a comedian’s derogatory comment about Puerto Rico at a Donald Trump rally, have opened a door for Trump to shift focus away from his own controversial campaign tactics.

Biden criticised the comedian’s description of Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage,” asserting that the people of Puerto Rico are “good, decent, and honourable.” However, his defence sparked a political uproar, detracting from Vice President Kamala Harris’s key closing speech on Tuesday evening, CNN reported.

“And just the other day, a speaker at his rally called Puerto Rico ‘a floating island of garbage.’ Well, let me tell you something… I don’t know the Puerto Rican that I know… or Puerto Rico where I’m–in my home state of Delaware–they’re good, decent, honourable people,” Biden said during his virtual remarks in a get-out-the-vote call meant to help Harris.

“The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters,” Biden said, adding, “His demonisation of Latinos is unconscionable and it’s un-American.”

The White House quickly attempted to clarify Biden’s remarks, stating he was referring to the “hateful rhetoric” at the Trump rally rather than the former president’s supporters. Biden himself took to social media to explain that his use of “garbage” referred to the comments made about Puerto Rico, not to Trump’s supporters, as reported by CNN.

“Earlier today, I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump’s supporters at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage–which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonisation of Latinos is unconscionable. That’s all I meant to say. The comments at that rally don’t reflect who we are as a nation,” Biden wrote on X.

Biden’s remarks drew immediate parallels to Hillary Clinton’s infamous “basket of deplorables” comment in 2016, which became a rallying cry for Trump and his supporters. In the aftermath, Harris felt compelled to address the controversy on Wednesday, emphasising her belief in representing all voters, regardless of their political affiliations, CNN reported.

“Listen, I think, first of all, he clarified his comments, but let me be clear: I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for,” the Democratic nominee said. “You heard my speech last night and continuously throughout my career. I believe that the work that I do is about representing all the people, whether they support me or not,” Harris said.

“I am sincere in what I mean: when elected president of the United States, I will represent all Americans, including those who don’t vote for me, and address their needs and their desires,” she added.

However, Trump wasted no time seizing upon Biden’s comments. At a rally, he referenced Biden’s words, suggesting they were worse than Clinton’s, and positioned his campaign as one that welcomes diverse support from various demographic groups. The Trump campaign quickly framed Biden’s remarks as indicative of a broader disdain for his supporters, as reported by CNN.

“Wow. That’s terrible. That’s what it says. That’s what it says. So, you have, remember Hillary, she said ‘deplorable’ and then she said ‘irredeemable,’ right? But she said deplorable; that didn’t work out. ‘Garbage’ I think is worse, right?” Trump said.

Trump takes jibe

Meanwhile, Donald Trump climbed up a campaign-themed garbage truck in Wisconsin on Wednesday, seizing on President Joe Biden’s remarks in which he appeared to label Trump supporters as “garbage,” as reported by The Hill.

“How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honour of Kamala and Joe Biden,” Trump said from the passenger seat, which featured a Trump campaign sticker and flag. His campaign staff widely circulated photos of the event as photographers captured the moment, The Hill reported.

The Trump campaign is working to leverage the outrage among his supporters over Biden’s comment, with Vice President and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris seeking to distance herself from it.

Biden faced backlash after he seemingly compared Trump supporters to ‘garbage’ while discussing a racially charged joke made by comedian Tony Hinchcliffe at a Trump rally, which referred to Puerto Rico as an “island of garbage,” The Hill reported.

Following his remark, Biden inadvertently thrust him back into the political spotlight just a week before the US presidential elections.

Biden criticised the comedian’s description of Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage,” asserting that the people of Puerto Rico are “good, decent, and honourable.” However, his defence sparked a political uproar, detracting from Vice President Kamala Harris’s key closing speech on Tuesday evening, CNN reported.

ALSO READ: President Biden to celebrate Diwali

Categories
-Top News Politics USA

Harris holds slight edge over Trump

Harris and Trump exchanged barbs over the airwaves as they reached out to the few remaining undecided voters in the final stretch of an election seen as one of the closest in modern US history…reports Asian Lite News

Harris has maintained a lead of two-to-three points in national polling since mid-August, despite presidential and vice presidential debates, encouraging jobs data, an interest rate cut, escalating international crises and a devastating hurricane.

“I literally lose sleep — and have been — over what is at stake in this election,” the Democratic vice president, 59, told radio icon Howard Stern in a 70-minute live interview.

A poll from Siena College and The New York Times out Tuesday highlighted the deadlock, finding Harris ahead of her Republican rival by 49 percent to 46 percent — although it had the pair in a dead heat in September.

Poll-watchers expect the stalemate to break only in the last couple of weeks before election day on November 5, as the small fraction of wavering Americans who will decide the election break one way or the other.

In the seven battleground states seen as likely to determine the election, the race is even tighter. The new poll gave Trump the edge on who is the stronger leader but, crucially, revealed that registered voters see Harris as the change candidate.

Harris — who has spent much of the campaign under pressure to sit down for more interviews — is spending the week targeting women, Latinos and young voters through traditional media and via appearances on influential podcasts and YouTube shows.

“The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” a staple of the evening comedy talk show circuit, was set to air a pre-recorded interview late Tuesday with Harris — and in excerpts shared ahead of the broadcast she called Trump a “loser.”

Trump “openly admires dictators and authoritarians,” she said during a weighty section of what was, at times, a light-hearted conversation in which both host and interviewee sipped beer.

“He has said he wants to be a dictator on day one if he were elected again as president. He gets played by these guys. He admires so-called strongmen and he gets played because they flatter him or offer him favor,” she said.

Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump has maintained an aggressive posture toward his Democratic rival Kamala Harris

Earlier, on popular ABC television show “The View,” she talked about campaigning recently with Republican former congresswoman Liz Cheney. There are more than 200 former officials from past Republican presidents George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as officials tied to Republican heavyweights John McCain and Mitt Romney, who have endorsed her, Harris said.

“We really are building a coalition around some very fundamental issues, including that we love our country and that we have to put country before party,” she said.

Trump meanwhile maintained his aggressive posture, attacking Harris as a “very low intelligence person” on conservative influencer Ben Shapiro’s podcast. The 78-year-old Republican claimed she had been “missing in action” over the federal response to Hurricane Helene — even though Harris visited the disaster zone last week.

Trump, who was on a blitz of several media organizations, then criticized Harris in an interview on right-wing network Newsmax over her plans to pay for her agenda, telling viewers: “You don’t tax the rich… the rich pay most of the tax in the country.”

And, in a more personal moment, he told Los Angeles radio station KFI AM 640 he sees campaign interviews as therapeutic. “You know what this is for me? Therapy, okay? I’m speaking to a smart man. This is like, some people go to a psychiatrist. I don’t have time so this is, like, my therapy,” he told host John Kobylt.

Both candidates were due to appear on the influential CBS show “60 Minutes” this week and while Harris fulfilled her commitment, Trump backed out, offering shifting explanations for his about-face.

He was mocked by Democrats and responded with a campaign statement demanding the transcript of the Harris interview be released, claiming that it had been “deceptively edited.”

Meanwhile, Emory University political science professor Zachary Peskowitz predicts that the polls will be a “nail-biter” and that no candidate has a decisive lead in any of the seven swing states.

Peskowitz says that the electoral college in the US elections will be “extraordinarily close” and the popular vote is going to be “very close.” Asked about his expectations from the two candidates with regards to electoral college and popular votes, Peskowitz says, “So, I think the popular vote is going to be very close. I think within two or three percentage points one way or the other, electoral college is going to be extraordinarily close as well. You know, it’s quite possible that there will be a narrow victory.”

“There’s even a possibility that it will be a tie in electoral college, 269 to 269 that will end up going to the US House of Representatives. You know it’s going to be very close and it’s going to come down to these seven states. So, all the recent polling shows it’s just very close. No candidate has a decisive lead in any of the seven states and it’s gonna be a nail-biter,” the US university professor says.

ALSO READ: Kamala Harris Vows to Unite America

Categories
-Top News London News UK News

Trump, Starmer meet for two-hour New York dinner

Trump and Starmer were also joined by Britain’s Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who has made scathing remarks about Trump in the past…reports Asian Lite News

Keir Starmer met Donald Trump in New York for a two-hour dinner, the first meeting for the new British Prime Minister and the former US President, media reports said on Friday.

Trump, the Republican nominee in November’s US election, hosted the Labour Party leader at Trump Tower on Thursday, the BBC, The Guardian and The Daily Mail reported.

Speaking ahead of the meeting, Trump told reporters: “I actually think he’s very nice. He ran a great race. He did very well. It’s very early. He’s very popular.”

Starmer won a landslide election victory in the UK’s July general election, ousting the Conservatives after 14 years in power.

Starmer said it was important for him to meet both candidates in the US election but that “diary challenges” meant it had not been possible to schedule a meeting with Vice President and Democrat nominee Kamala Harris.

“We’ve now got the opportunity to meet Trump, which is good,” he said.

Trump and Starmer were also joined by Britain’s Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who has made scathing remarks about Trump in the past.

In 2018, Lammy called Trump “a woman-hating, neo-Nazi-sympathizing sociopath.”

However, Lammy was more diplomatic earlier this year, saying in a speech that Trump’s “attitude to European security is often misunderstood.”

Starmer has taken a neutral stance on the US election, although experts say a Trump presidency could pose difficulties, particularly with doubts over the Republican’s support for NATO and Ukraine.

Starmer was in New York attending the United Nations General Assembly.

ALSO READ: Iran’s Khamenei Moved to Secure Location After Hezbollah Chief Killing

Categories
-Top News Politics USA

Muslim group endorses Harris, says Trump bigger danger

The endorsement comes as the 2024 race between Harris and Trump remains very tight ahead of the Nov. 5 election….reports Asian Lite News

US Muslim advocacy group Emgage Action on Wednesday endorsed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris despite its ongoing concern over the war in Gaza, saying former President Donald Trump posed a greater danger with his promise to reinstate travel restrictions affecting majority-Muslim countries.

The endorsement comes as the 2024 race between Harris and Trump remains very tight ahead of the Nov. 5 election. Arab American and Muslim voters may play a decisive role in the outcome in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and other battleground states. These voters helped President Joe Biden defeat Trump in 2020 by thousands of votes.

Many Muslim groups, including Emgage Action, have criticized the Biden administration, where Harris serves as vice president, for its support of Israel’s war in Gaza. Harris has urged an immediate ceasefire and hostage release deal in Gaza, saying she supports Israel’s right to defend itself as well as the Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

“While we do not agree with all of Harris’ policies, particularly on the war on Gaza, we are approaching this election with both pragmatism and conviction,” Emgage CEO Wa’el Alzayat said in a statement, adding it sought to provide “honest guidance to our voters regarding the difficult choice they confront at the ballot box.”

Emgage Action, which endorsed Biden in 2020, said it mobilized 1 million Muslim voters in that election. The group said the Harris endorsement reflects a “responsibility to defeat Trump and defend the community against what would be a return to Islamophobic and other harmful policies.”

Trump’s campaign had no immediate comment.

His campaign has held dozens of events with Arab Americans and Muslims in swing states and plans another event this weekend in Michigan, Richard Grenell, Trump’s former acting director of national intelligence, said last week.

Trump has said he will reinstate the “travel ban” that restricts entry into the United States of people from a list of largely Muslim-dominant countries. Biden rolled back the ban shortly after taking office in 2021.

The Harris campaign welcomed the endorsement a week after another big voting bloc, the pro-Palestinian grassroots organization Uncommitted National Movement, said it would not endorse Harris, Trump or a third-party candidate.

Harris has already won the backing of smaller Muslim groups, including the Black Muslim Leadership Council Fund and the American Muslim Democratic Caucus.

The US, Israel’s biggest ally and weapons supplier, has sent Israel more than 10,000 highly destructive 2,000-pound (900-kg) bombs and thousands of Hellfire missiles since the start of the Gaza war in October, US officials told Reuters in June.

The war in the Gaza Strip began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas gunmen stormed into Israeli communities, killing some 1,200 people and abducting about 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.

Since then, Israel’s military has leveled swaths of Gaza, driving nearly all of its 2.3 million people from their homes, giving rise to deadly hunger and disease and killing more than 41,000 people, according to Palestinian health authorities.

ALSO READ: US call for ceasefire across Lebanon-Israel border

Categories
-Top News Politics World News

Why we are losing faith in our politicians and institutions

We are losing faith in the various institutions at central or local government level that rule our lives. This is a very worrying development. What it means is that politicians can emerge who seek and even win power by saying the system is corrupt and cannot be trusted, writes Mihir Bose

The night after the fire at Grenfell Tower I was doing the Paper Review on BBC News, a program that no longer exists. The papers we were reviewing reported the fire extensively with all of them reporting how the fire had started, how many may have died, at that time there was no definite number of the people killed, and praise for how the fire brigade had responded. There was nothing about cladding or the real causes of the fire. The papers had complete confidence that the authorities bore no responsibility for this disaster and that they would handle the aftermath with great care giving attention to those who had survived.  Sir Martin Moore-Bick’s enquiry shows how wrong the papers were although it has taken us seven years to learn the truth.

The 1,700-page final report makes it very clear the fire “was the culmination of decades of failure by central government and other bodies in positions of responsibility in the construction industry to look carefully into the danger of incorporating combustible materials into the external walls of high rise residential building and to act on the information available to them”.

In the days after the fire much was made that there was cladding at Grenfell to improve energy efficiency leading to criticism about those who campaign about energy. That says the report was not the case. The “initial motive for cladding Grenfell Tower was to improve its physical appearance and to prevent it looking like a poor relation” to a building next door. The argument to improve energy efficiency came later. The report makes it clear there was always a relentless focus on cost.

In the days after the fire much was made about how well the survivors were being looked after. But the report says survivors were “comprehensively failed” and “left to fend for themselves”. They were “abandoned” without information after the fire had taken place, killing 72 people, and this was a fire scene that was described as a “horror film” and “war zone”. The survivors were not sure who had escaped and as they looked for loved ones they experienced feelings of “utter helplessness and despair”. For the survivors there is “long-lasting trauma” and their “lives have been changed forever”.

As for the emergency accommodation provided by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, which was extensively reported in the weeks after the fire and praised, this was not adequate and arrangements for obtaining food at some hotels made some people “feel like refugees”. “Survivors described it as living in a limbo, with no space to heal.”

The papers on the day I did the Paper Review and immediately afterwards praised the London Fire Brigade. The report says, “One significant shortcoming was a failure to recognise the possibility that in the event of a fire in a high-rise residential building a large number of calls seeking help, both from within and outside the building, might be generated. The LFB failed to take any steps to enable it to respond effectively to that kind of demand. As a result, when faced with a large number of calls about people needing to be rescued from Grenfell Tower, both those in the control room and those responsible for handling that information at the fireground were forced to resort to various improvised methods of varying reliability to handle the large amount of information they received.”

An apartment building is engulfed by a massive fire in western London, Britain, June 14, 2017. (Xinhua/Han Yan/IANS)

All this means there is a gap growing between those who rule us and the reality we experience. Grenfell is not the only example and comes after the shocking Post Office and contaminated blood scandals. In all of these cases people relied on government to help them only to find that they not only did not but often did not want to. Their attitude was the one the great dramatist Bertolt Brecht mocked when living in communist East Germany. “Some party hacks decreed that the people had lost the government’s confidence and could only regain it with redoubled effort. If that is the case, would it not be simpler, If the government simply dissolved the people and elected another?”

Looking at the government’s response to these scandals you do get the impression our government, despite being democratic, would like to elect another people.

Now in many developing countries this is common. I remember when I was living in India there was a coal mine disaster. Immediately a figure was given out by the authorities about how many had died. I was told that figure was obviously wrong. It had been understated. It was much higher.

In these former colonial countries suppressing the truth is not uncommon and they are, you could say, carrying on in the way the colonial authorities behaved. So, there is still discrepancy about how many were killed by the British at Jallianwala Bagh when General Dyer ordered his troops to shoot innocent people gathered in an Amritsar park. Read any history book on the subject and you will find two figures. One given in the Hunter inquiry appointed by the British Raj is 379 and the other figure, given by a rival inquiry held by the Congress party, is well over a 1,000.  There is similar disagreement about how many people died in the Bengal famine, the worst famine in south Asian history,  during the war with the difference running into millions, the British Raj figure being the smaller one. But then it suited a conqueror to  conceal the truth. That in free India people do not believe what the government says after a disaster shows how in that respect society has not changed.

But however Britain behaved in its colonies, something many people in this country do not know and even now cannot come to terms with, we in Britain are supposed to be different. Here a disaster is followed by a report of inquiry which makes recommendations. Grenfell is part of that tradition. It is very likely that as a result of this report there will be changes in building regulations, the defects of which the report highlights. It  recommends a single regulator, answerable to a government minister, so that officials and industry can be held to account. The government may well accept that recommendation to show it is responding. The police are also conducting a major inquiry with potential crimes under investigation including corporate manslaughter, fraud and misconduct in public office.

One problem is the time it has taken. The inquiry  took seven years to finish its work, interrupted by Covid. Any trial as a result of the police investigation may not take place until 2027, ten years after the fire.

But more that, like former colonial countries, what the Grenfell fire shows is that  we as a country now face a huge problem. We are losing faith in the various institutions at central or local government level that rule our lives. This is  a very worrying development. What it means is that politicians can emerge who seek and even win power by saying the system is corrupt and cannot be trusted. In America this has happened and may happen again this November.

Donald Trump is the classic example of that. His whole strategy is to call his opponents liars and say he is the only man telling the truth. So much so that he has refused to accept his defeat in the last Presidential election and still insists he was cheated by the rigging of the vote. That is the sort of thing that we hear after elections in developing countries. That it is now coming from the country proud to have been the first to democratically elect its head of state shows how things have changed. It is because of such distrust that Trump’s followers do not find it outrageous that in the Presidential debate with Kamala Harris he claimed that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Illinois were eating cats despite the city authorities saying there was no evidence of it. When you have lost faith in institutions you will believe anything, and Trump thrives on it. He knows his followers will believe whatever he says and that is the path to power.

Our politicians in Britan do not go that far but there is growing sense in this country that when they, or an institution they run, says something they may be hiding the truth.

Sir Keir Starmer has promised to restore our trust in government. This may explain why he has become the merchant of gloom. But if this turns out to be just a political weapon to paint the Conservatives as unable to govern and not quite the whole truth then it will do nothing to restore trust. The distrust between the governors and the governed will in fact grow and we will be faced with politicians emerging in this country who are in the mould of Trump profiting from such alienation. A lot is riding on Starmer to fulfil his promise to make us believe that we can trust those we elect to rule us to tell it like it is.

(Mihir Bose is the author of Thank You Mr Crombie Lessons in Guilt and Gratitude from the British.)

ALSO READ: No inquiry into undeclared gifts for Starmer’s wife, say No10

ALSO READ: Starmer Renews Special Ties With the US

Categories
-Top News Politics USA

Harris, Trump clash on Afghanistan

Kamala Harris pivoted to attack Trump for setting up the withdrawal with a deal with “terrorists” Taliban and keeping out the Afghan government….reports Asian Lite News

Vice President Kamala Harris defended President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw the US from Afghanistan saying it was something that four other presidents had wanted but not done and it saved $300 million a day that was spent on staying there.

But she pivoted to attack Trump for setting up the withdrawal with a deal with “terrorists” Taliban and keeping out the Afghan government.

“He calls himself a deal maker, even his national security adviser said it was a weak, terrible deal, and here’s how it went down. He bypassed the Afghan government. He negotiated directly with a terrorist organisation called the Taliban.

The negotiation involved the Taliban getting 5000 terrorists. Taliban terrorists released and got this. No, get this. And the president at the time, invited the Taliban to Camp David, a place of storied significance for us as Americans, a place where we honour the importance of American diplomacy, where we invite and receive respected world leaders. And this former President, as President, invited them to Camp David because he does not again appreciate the role and responsibility of the President of the United States to be commander in chief with a level of respect,” she said.

“So if you take a look at that period of time, the Taliban was killing our soldiers, a lot of them with snipers,” Trump said, defending himself. “And I got involved with the Taliban because the Taliban was doing the killing. That’s the fighting force within Afghanistan. They don’t bother doing that because, you know, they deal with the wrong people all the time. But I got involved, and Abdul is the head of the Taliban.

He is still the head of the Taliban. And I told Abdul, don’t do it anymore. You do it anymore. You’re going to have problems. And he said, why do you send me a picture of my house? I said, you’re going to have to figure that out, Abdul. And for 18 months, we had nobody killed. We did have an agreement negotiated by Mike Pompeo. It was a very good agreement. The reason it was good was, we were getting out. We would have been out faster than that, but we wouldn’t have lost the soldiers. We wouldn’t have left many Americans behind, and we wouldn’t have left, we wouldn’t have left $85 billion worth of brand new, beautiful military equipment behind. And just to finish, they blew it,” he further said.

“The agreement said, you have to do this, this, this, this, and they didn’t do it. They didn’t do it. The agreement was terminated by us because they didn’t do what they were supposed to do,” Trump added.

Taylor Swift endorses Harris; Musk takes a jibe

Tesla CEO Elon Musk made a jibe at American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift who threw her support behind Vice president Kamala Harris for the next president following a high stakes debate with former president Donald Trump.

Post the presidential debate hosted by ABC News between Harris and Trump held in Philedelphia on Tuesday (local time), Swift announced that she is endorsing Democratic candidate Kamala Harris for the 2024 US Presidential Election.

“Fine Taylor…you win…I will give you a child and guard your cats with my life,” Musk posted.

Swift in a social media post announced “I will be “casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election.”

Swift termed Harris a “steady-handed” and “gifted” leader.

“Like many of you, I watched the debate tonight. If you haven’t already, now is a great time to do your research on the issues at hand and the stances these candidates take on the topics that matter to you the most. As a voter, I make sure to watch and read everything I can about their proposed policies and plans for this country,” Swift said.

“I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election. I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them. I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos. I was so heartened and impressed by her selection of running mate @timwalz, who has been standing up for LGBTQ+ rights, IVF, and a woman’s right to her own body for decades,” the singer added.

She signed off her post calling herself a “childless cat lady,” alluding to a phrase previously used by Sen JD Vance, Trump’s running mate, to criticize Democrats.

This is not the first time, Swift has supported Harris and Democrats. In 2020, she announced her support for Biden and Harris in their bid for the White House, CNN Entertainment reported.

A segment of Swift’s fans, known as Swifties, have united during the 2024 election cycle, establishing an online community called Swifties for Kamala shortly after Biden exited the race and endorsed Harris, as reported by CNN Entertainment.

Harris was nominated as the Democratic nominee after President Joe Biden quit the presidential race amid mounting concerns over his age, particularly after his poor show in the debate with Donald Trump in June.

She is the first female, first Black, and first Asian American vice president. If elected president, the 59-year-old Harris would become the first woman in history to become the US president. The vice president is only the second woman ever nominated for the presidency by a major political party.

Harris is up against Donald Trump, the former President who is aiming a return to the White House after his bitter exit in 2020. The presidential polls are scheduled on November 5. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Harris puts Trump on defense

Categories
-Top News Politics USA

Trump vows to punish colleges for ‘antisemitic propaganda’

Trump made clear his intent to penalize colleges where protests against Israel have been prevalent…reports Asian Lite News

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump pledged on Thursday that, if elected, he would strip U.S. universities of accreditation and federal funding if they do not put an end to what he described as “anti-Semitic propaganda.”

Speaking remotely to over 1,000 donors at a Republican Jewish Coalition event in Las Vegas, Trump made clear his intent to penalize colleges where protests against Israel have been prevalent, according to Reuters report.

“Colleges will and must end the anti-Semitic propaganda, or they will lose their accreditation and federal support,” Trump stated, pointing to the protests on campuses earlier this year that opposed Israel’s military actions in Gaza.

These protests, led by students, demanded universities cut ties with companies backing Israel. Republicans argue that such protests highlight anti-Semitism within the Democratic Party, though protest groups have denied this, claiming their stance is a critique of Israel’s policies, not of Jewish people.

The Association of American Universities, which represents major U.S. higher education institutions, did not immediately respond to Trump’s remarks. While the federal government does not directly accredit universities, it oversees private organizations that do, which gives the government indirect influence.

Trump also proposed policies to crack down on immigration from conflict zones, pledging to ban refugee resettlements from areas like Gaza and to arrest “pro-Hamas thugs” involved in acts of vandalism, referring to the student protests.

However, U.S. State Department data shows that under both Trump and Biden administrations, the U.S. accepted a comparable number of Palestinian refugees.

Although Trump’s speech provided limited new Middle East policy details, he warned of what he called a dire future for Israel under a potential Harris presidency, claiming without evidence that Israel would be abandoned if Vice President Kamala Harris were to take office.

Harris, who supports Israel alongside President Joe Biden, has nonetheless advocated for a ceasefire in Gaza, describing the humanitarian situation as devastating.

Since Hamas’ attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023, which left approximately 1,200 Israelis dead and 250 hostages, Israel’s military response has killed over 40,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities.

The conflict has displaced most of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents, triggered a hunger crisis, and led to genocide accusations against Israel, which the country denies.

ALSO READ: Blinken in Haiti to show support for fighting gang violence

Categories
-Top News Politics USA

Trump pushes high tariffs, onshoring; India could face impact

Trump made no mention of India or software or back office jobs, concentrating on China and manufacturing….reports Arul Louis

 Doubling down on the ‘America First’ agenda of his first term, former US President Donald Trump threatened if he is elected again to enforce a policy of high tariffs and bringing back manufacturing that could impact India.

In particular, it would strike at collaborative defence manufacturing that is beginning to take off in India.

“We want an industrial base that can take care of our defence needs 100 per cent” to safeguard national security, he said on Thursday at the Economic Club of New York before an audience of business leaders.

“You can call it what you want. Some might say it’s economic nationalism. I call it common sense. I call it America first,” he said in a speech loaded with hyperbole.

He cited the distributive manufacturing of F-35 stealth fighter jets, the parts for which are made in different countries, calling it a risk to US defence.

If Trump were elected and introduced the policy of 100 per cent defence manufacture in the US, it could affect, for example, the project to co-produce F-414 jet engines that envisages technology transfer of up to 80 per cent, as well as other joint manufacturing plans.

But implementing it would face several hurdles.

His threat of high tariffs would also affect the manufacturing — like Apple phones — that is sprouting in India because of the China factor.

Trump made no mention of India or software or back office jobs, concentrating on China and manufacturing.

At the meeting, Trump outlined his economic policy if he were to return to the White House.

To applause from the audience, he announced he would bring in Elon Musk, the Tesla and Space X boss, to head a government efficiency commission to run a financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and recommend drastic reforms to save “trillions”.

At the same time, he said that he would end the mandates for electric vehicles, an industry Musk, who has endorsed him, is heavily invested in.

Deregulating government to free business activity, as he put it, is a key plank of his economic plan.

He said he would turn the US into a “manufacturing superpower” and make “America the world capital for crypto and Bitcoin”.

Most of his economic policy outline was about undoing the policies of the current administration, which he pointedly said was that of Vice-President Kamal Harris, his Democratic Party rival.

Not a believer in the impact of climate change, Trump said that he would end the green energy mandates and the restrictions on fossil fuels.

“Energy is going to bring us back,” Trump said, and increasing the production of fossil fuels would fight inflation, bringing down the cost of everything from groceries to electricity.

He said that he would enact an energy emergency to achieve the goal.

He made out his tariffs plan — which many economists have said would add to the inflation and set back the economy — to be the panacea for the deficit, the reduced revenues from tax cuts and higher spending for some of his plans.

From the higher tariffs, Trump said he would create a sovereign wealth fund like that of countries like Singapore that would “invest wisely” in infrastructure and in industries with the advice of private sector investors and its “gigantic returns” would rundown the national debt.

While he hit at China at several points, there was a measure of ambiguity.

Trump called President Xi Jinping a “dear, dear friend” and a very “fierce” and “smart” person.

“We had a very good relationship with China until Covid” epidemic undid it, he said.

“I believe we will have a very good relationship with China and with a lot of other countries that we’re not getting along with too well today,” he said, adding that it was “very important that we get along with the rest of the world” because of the nuclear threat.

As he always does at his meetings, he made ad hominem attacks on Harris, calling her a “Communist” and a “Marxist”, who was trying to adopt some of his policies.

Some of his plan like threats to end defence manufacturing abroad and across-the-board tariff hikes are unlikely to work the way he claims because of underlying alliances, the web of geostrategic interests, reciprocal trade, and immediate supply chain issues.

While in office Trump tangled with India over tariffs, making the duties on Harley-Davidson motorcycles a cause celebre.

He hiked duties on steel and aluminum imports and eliminated the Generalised Scheme of Preferences for some Indian exports and New Delhi retaliated by raising tariffs mostly on agricultural exports like apples and almonds.

ALSO READ: Blinken in Haiti to show support for fighting gang violence

Categories
-Top News Politics USA

Battle lines drawn for Sept. 10 debate  

ABC News has laid out parameters from the basic format — 90 minutes, with two commercial breaks — to specifications that moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis…reports Asian Lite News

Vice President Kamala Harris has accepted the rules set forth for next week’s debate with former President Donald Trump, although the Democratic nominee says the decision not to keep both candidates’ microphones live throughout the matchup will be to her disadvantage.

The development, which came Wednesday by way of a letter from Harris’ campaign to host network ABC News, seemed to mark a conclusion to the debate over microphone muting, which had for a time threatened to derail the Sept. 10 presidential debate at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.

President Joe Biden’s campaign had made the muting of microphones, except for the candidate whose turn it is to speak, a condition of his decision to accept any debates this year. Some aides have said they now regret that decision, saying voters were shielded from hearing Trump’s outbursts during the June debate. A disastrous performance for the incumbent Democrat fueled his exit from the campaign.

Once Harris rose in Biden’s stead and became their party’s pick for president, her campaign had advocated for live microphones for the whole debate, saying previously that the practice would “fully allow for substantive exchanges between the candidates.”

But on Wednesday, Harris’ advisers wrote that the former prosecutor will be “fundamentally disadvantaged by this format, which will serve to shield Donald Trump from direct exchanges with the Vice President.”

“We suspect this is the primary reason for his campaign’s insistence on muted microphones,” her campaign added.

Despite those concerns, Harris’ campaign wrote, “we understand that Donald Trump is a risk to skip the debate altogether, as he has threatened to do previously, if we do not accede to his preferred format.” So as not to “jeopardize the debate,” Harris’ campaign wrote, “we accepted the full set of rules proposed by ABC, including muted microphones.”

According to an official with Harris’ campaign, a pool of journalists will be on hand to hear what the muted candidate may be trying to say when his or her microphone is turned off. That detail was not in the full debate rules, also released Wednesday by ABC, which are essentially the same as they were for the June debate between Trump and Biden.

The network laid out parameters from the basic format — 90 minutes, with two commercial breaks — to specifications that moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis “will be the only people asking questions,” perhaps hoping to avert a free-for-all between the candidates.

“Moderators will seek to enforce timing agreements and ensure a civilized discussion,” the network noted.

The Harris campaign official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss planning around the debate, said a candidate who repeatedly interrupts will receive a warning from a moderator, and both candidates’ microphones may be unmuted if there is significant crosstalk so the audience can understand what’s happening.

After a virtual coin flip held Tuesday and won by Trump, the GOP nominee opted to offer the final closing statement, while Harris chose the podium on the right side of viewers’ screens. There will be no audience, written notes or any topics or questions shared with campaigns or candidates in advance, the network said.

Meanwhile, Harris leads Trump 45 percent to 41 percent in a Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Thursday that showed the vice president sparking new enthusiasm among voters and shaking up the race ahead of the Nov. 5 election.

The 4 percentage point advantage among registered voters was wider than a 1 point lead Harris held over the former president in a late July Reuters/Ipsos poll. The new poll, which was conducted in the eight days ended Wednesday and had a 2 percentage point margin of error, showed Harris picking up support among women and Hispanics.

Harris led Trump by 49 percent to 36 percent — or 13 percentage points — among both women voters and Hispanic voters. Across four Reuters/Ipsos polls conducted in July, Harris had a 9 point lead among women and a 6 point lead among Hispanics.

Trump led among white voters and men, both by similar margins as in July, though his lead among voters without a college degree narrowed to 7 points in the latest survey, down from 14 points in July.

The findings illustrate how the US presidential race has been shaken up over the summer. President Joe Biden, 81, folded his flailing campaign on July 21 after a disastrous debate performance against Trump sparked widespread calls from his fellow Democrats to abandon his re-election bid.

Since then, Harris has gained ground against Trump in national polls and those in critical swing states. While national surveys including Reuters/Ipsos’ give important signals on the views of the electorate, the state-by-state results of the Electoral College determine the winner, with a handful of battleground states likely to be decisive.

ALSO READ: UAE President tours ADIHEX in Abu Dhabi