Categories
-Top News Politics UK News

Row erupts over Jenrick’s Islamophobic comment

Labour MP Naz Shah, vice-chair of a cross-party group on British Muslims, called Jenrick’s Allahu Akbar comments “complete ignorance and textbook Islamophobia”…reports Asian Lite News

Tory leadership contender Robert Jenrick has been accused of “textbook Islamophobia” after saying that people shouting Allahu Akbar should be “immediately arrested”.

The former immigration minister said he had been “very critical of the police in the past”, particularly around the policing of protests against the war in Gaza, which started after Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October last year.

He told Sky News: “You know, I thought it was quite wrong that somebody could shout Allahu Akbar on the streets of London and not be immediately arrested, or project genocidal chants on to Big Ben and that person not be immediately arrested. That attitude is wrong.”

Jenrick praised the police for their efforts over the past week, in which rioters across the country have injured officers. Speaking in parliament in February, Jenrick said: “We’ve allowed our streets to be dominated by Islamist extremists”.

Asked about using that phrase, he said: “Well, I think I was absolutely right. And, you know, there were instances back then where we saw Islamist extremists on our streets. I’ve just given you one example where you literally had somebody chanting or shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ off Oxford Street. We saw people commending the Houthis for firing missiles at British flagged vessels, you know, in the seas. You know, that is completely wrong. That is anti-British. And we should be calling it out.”

Labour MP Naz Shah, vice-chair of a cross-party group on British Muslims, called Jenrick’s Allahu Akbar comments “complete ignorance and textbook Islamophobia”.

“It literally equates every Muslim in the world with extremism,” she said and explained the phrase means “God is Great” and is said by “every Muslim in the world” during prayer.

“Imagine in this climate, either being that ignorant or deliberately trying to stigmatise all Muslims,” she said.

“He should apologise and speak to Muslim communities and learn more about our faith.”

The Muslim Council of Britain also condemned his comments, saying they were “shocked” and called it “Islamophobic rhetoric, the lowest common denominator for demagogues”.

“It only goes to show that institutional Islamophobia is alive and well in the Conservative Party,” a spokeswoman said.

“As a prospective leader, Jenrick should be showing leadership, reassuring our communities when fear is palpable. He should apologise, fully retract his comments, and speak to ordinary Muslims to understand why his remarks are so outrageous.”

The spokeswoman accused Jenrick of emboldening the “far-right thugs” and said he should be focusing on ways to bring communities together instead.

Following the accusations of Islamophobia, Jenrick posted a video on X of a march through Bolton with people chanting “Allahu Akbar”.

He said: “‘Allahu Akbar’ is spoken peacefully and spiritually by millions of British Muslims in their daily lives. But the aggressive chanting below is intimidatory and threatening.

“And it’s an offence under Section 4 and 5 of the Public Order Act. Extremists routinely abuse common expressions for their own shameful ends.

“All violence must end. All violence must be called out.”

Former Tory Foreign Office minister Lord Ahmad called on Jenrick to apologise.

Baroness Warsi, a former Tory cabinet minister, addressed Jenrick directly on X, saying: “No Robert, you do not get to go on national broadcasters and say one thing and try and pretend you said something else after! If you genuinely feel you comments on Sky News were inappropriate, offensive, incendiary and anti Muslim (which they were) then start by apologising. Then you can go back to pretending you a responsible candidate for the leadership of our party.”

ALSO READ-Police deploy 6,000 specially trained officers  

Categories
INDIA 2024 India News West Bengal

Didi’s offer to cook food for PM stirs row

The CPI(M) weighed in, hinting at a possible political alliance between the TMC and the BJP, while criticizing both Banerjee and Modi for intertwining politics with religion…reports Asian Lite News

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s unconventional offer to “cook food” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ignited a flurry of reactions across the political spectrum. Banerjee’s invitation, delivered with a hint of sarcasm, has been met with a blend of skepticism and support from various quarters.

Banerjee’s gesture came as a response to Prime Minister Modi’s recent remark accusing RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav of consuming fish during a Hindu fasting period. During an election rally, Banerjee took a dig at Modi’s alleged interference in dietary choices and expressed her willingness to prepare a meal for him.

While Banerjee’s supporters laud her culinary skills and defend her stance on individual dietary autonomy, critics, particularly from the BJP, have questioned the underlying motives. Former BJP state president Tathagata Roy mocked Banerjee’s offer, suggesting she first extend it to her lieutenant Firhad Hakim.

“Mamata Banerjee wants to feed Modi ji with fish and rice cooked by her. Good proposal. But before that, why doesn’t she first offer pork chop to her lieutenant Firhad Hakim? It will serve three purposes, secularism will be asserted, it will show charity begins at home and the fritters will also be praised,” Roy posted on X.

The CPI(M) weighed in, hinting at a possible political alliance between the TMC and the BJP, while criticizing both Banerjee and Modi for intertwining politics with religion. However, the TMC stood by Banerjee, emphasizing her defense of India’s religious and cultural diversity.

In the midst of these divergent perspectives, the debate over Banerjee’s offer underscores broader issues of political rhetoric, individual rights, and the delicate balance between religious freedom and political agendas in India.

ALSO READ-Priyanka slams PM Modi, says she brought her dad back in pieces

Categories
-Top News Defence

France probe into Rafale deal revives political row in India

Congress demands Prime Minister Narendra Modi to order an investigation, reports Asian Lite News

The controversy over the Rafale jet deal has resurfaced with the Congress party seeking a joint parliamentary committee investigation after a French news website reported that a French judge has been appointed to lead a “highly sensitive” judicial probe into alleged “corruption and favouritism” in the Rs 59,000-crore deal with India.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi should order the investigation, Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala told reporters in Delhi on Saturday. “Corruption in the Rafale deal has come out clearly now. The stand of the Congress party and Rahul Gandhi has been vindicated today after the French government ordered a probe,” Surjewala said.

France’s National Financial Prosecutors’ Office on Friday said it will look into alleged corruption in the sale of Rafale jets to India. This French judicial institution was created in December 2013 to track down serious economic and financial crimes.

“When the French government has accepted that there is corruption in the deal, should a JPC (joint parliamentary committee) probe be not held in the country where the corruption took place?” Mr Surjewala said.

The Congress had used alleged corruption in the Rafale deal to attack the government during the intense campaign for the general election in 2019. Party leader Rahul Gandhi had targeted PM Modi at his campaigns over the Rafale row.

On Saturday, Rahul Gandhi and his sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, who is a Congress General Secretary, tweeted on the controversy.

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth. – Lord Buddha,” Priyanka Gandhi tweeted, while her brother took a swipe at the Prime Minister using the hashtag “#RafaleScam”.

The BJP termed the Congress’s latest round of attacks over the Rafale deal as “lies”. “The way Rahul Gandhi is behaving, it will not be an exaggeration to say that he is being used as a pawn by competing companies. He has been lying right from the beginning on the issue. Probably, he is acting as an agent or some member of Gandhi family has been for a competing company,” BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra told reporters on Saturday.

Patra cited a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General and a Supreme Court verdict, both of which had found nothing wrong in the defence deal between India and France, to reject allegations of the Congress.

France’s Dassault Aviation had initially won a contract in 2012 to supply 126 jets to India and had been negotiating with Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). Later, HAL was replaced by Reliance Group and a new contract for 36 jets was finalised. The announcement to buy the 36 jets was made in an India-France joint statement when PM Modi visited France in April 2015.

ALSO READ-Commodore Rather: Rafale’s Kashmir touch

READ MORE-IAF to induct Rafales’ second squadron soon