Categories
Economy Health India News

Healthcare Leaders Urge Infra Investment, Tax Reforms in Union Budget

During the interim budget, the government had announced widening the coverage by including Anganwadi and ASHA workers. The experts urged the government to further widen the coverage by including the excluded self-employed, seniors above 70 years old, and other weaker groups…reports Asian Lite News

Prioritising and scaling up investment, infrastructure, medical tourism, and tax reforms will be key to creating a new ecosystem that can support the nation’s ambitious healthcare goals, said experts on Monday, ahead of the Union Budget 2024-25.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman is expected to present the Union Budget 2024 on July 23. While the interim budget in February has provided a roadmap, the journey toward transforming the entire healthcare landscape requires a comprehensive and concerted effort.

Speaking to IANS, Sugandh Ahluwalia, Chief Strategy Officer, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre (ISIC), New Delhi, said that a key expectation from the upcoming budget “is the reclassification of hospitals as infrastructure investments”.

“This reclassification can attract significant private sector investment, which is essential for building state-of-the-art healthcare facilities. In addition, extending interest rate subvention for medical equipment can alleviate financial burdens on hospitals, enabling them to upgrade their technology and improve service delivery,” said Ahluwalia.

During the interim budget, the government had announced widening the coverage by including Anganwadi and ASHA workers. The experts urged the government to further widen the coverage by including the excluded self-employed, seniors above 70 years old, and other weaker groups.

“This initiative is expected to go a long way in dealing with the acute shortage of doctors in India, especially in underserved areas,” Alok Khanna, Head Marketing and Branding Officer at Medanta Lucknow, told IANS. He also called on to “equip new medical colleges with state-of-the-art facilities and experienced faculty”.

“The government needs to pay attention to attract young doctors to work in tier II and III cities and rural areas to break the rural-urban divide and make quality care more accessible,” he added.

Further, the experts lauded the announcement of a cervical cancer vaccination programme in the interim budget as a positive move.

“It is promising to note that the government plans to promote vaccination for girls aged 9 to 14 to prevent cervical cancer. However, to maximise the impact of this programme, it is essential to ensure widespread awareness and accessibility,” Dr Ajay Kohli, Group Head, Oncology and Director, Corporate Growth Initiatives North and Narayana Hospital Gurugram, told IANS.

Stakeholders also called for increasing policy support for medical tourism — a significant foreign exchange earner.

“If we have to offer world-class and cost-effective treatment and care to patients even from the US, UK, and Europe, the government needs to take up the issue of flying time restrictions beyond certain hours through diplomatic channels. Cross-border partnerships can further promote medical value travel,” Baldev Raj, Founder and Chief, Prius Brand and Business Partners, told IANS.

He also stressed further pushing public-private partnerships (PPP) for “effective collaboration, hassle-free visas, advanced medical technology, knowledge exchange, and incentivised packages”.

The experts also urged the government to focus significantly on pharma and the diagnostics sector to further strengthen India’s status as a global leader in the healthcare industry.

“The sector needs a major boost in terms of quality innovation and research which has been considered a weak link for the Indian healthcare industry. Expanding healthcare facilities and centres through the PPP model and innovative investment models to resolve issues like resource crunch in the public health system and increase access and outreach is important,” Nilaya Varma, Co-founder and CEO, Primus Partners told.

Chronic diseases, building climate-resilient health structures, and the one health policy may be some of the other critical areas to target, he said.

Burnout Crisis Among Doctors

Hailed as gods on earth, healthcare staff — particularly doctors and nurses — are significantly prone to burnout. A new book stresses the need to increase compassion for them.

Professor Dame Clare Gerada, a London-based general practitioner, and former president of the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), UK, called for a more comprehensive guidance that focuses on “kindness” and “sensitivity”.

Citing the infamous case of the troubled Tanzanian-Indian prodigy and psychiatrist Dr Daksha Emson who took her own life and her daughter Freya in 2000, and a junior doctor Rose Polge who reportedly drowned herself in 2016, she said that employers often treat physicians as “naughty school children” when they go sick or suffer mental health problems.

A look at how Doctors maintain their mental health amidst the pandemic.(photo:IANSLIFE)

Emson was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and Polge suffered acute self-esteem issues.

Her book ‘The Handbook of Physician Mental Health’ also highlights how suicide rates are up four times in doctors, as compared to other professional groups. General Physicians, psychiatrists and doctors trained overseas among healthcare workers are the ones especially at risk.

Importantly, female clinicians face the double whammy of a second shift, first caring for the patients and their families.

Increased workload, bullying, and racism lead to doctors developing depression, anxiety, etc.

While there is guidance on how doctors should behave when unwell or consulting with a sick colleague, it is in the form of avoidance and blame, which needs to be changed urgently, Gerada said.

Patient complaints, moving around for better prospects, and unsatisfactory treatment further worsen the case as it alienates the doctors and increases the existing loneliness.

ALSO READ-G20 Presidency Drives Global Digital Public Infrastructure Agenda

Categories
Economy India News

India’s Direct Tax Collections Rise 19.5%

There has also been a 64.5 per cent increase in direct tax refunds during the current financial year at Rs 70,902 crore between April 1 and July 11…reports Asian Lite News

The country’s nets direct tax collection posted a robust 19.5 per cent growth to Rs 5.74 lakh as on till July 11 of the current financial year (2024-25) compared to the same period of the previous year, according to the latest figures compiled by the Income Tax Department

Net corporate tax collections from April 1 to July 11 increased 12.5 per cent over the same period last year to Rs 2.1 lakh crore, while personal income tax including securities transaction tax rose 24 per cent to Rs 3.64 lakh crore.

Gross direct tax collections, before refunds, surged 23.2 per cent compared to the same period last to Rs 6.45 lakh, the figures showed.

There has also been a 64.5 per cent increase in direct tax refunds during the current financial year at Rs 70,902 crore between April 1 and July 11.

The buoyancy in tax collections will help the government control the fiscal deficit as it gears up to present the full budget for 2024-15 on July 3.

The hefty Rs 2.11 lakh crore dividend from the RBI and the robust direct tax and GST collections will give the Finance Minister headroom for pushing ahead with policies aimed at accelerating growth and implementing social welfare schemes aimed at uplifting the poor.

The fiscal deficit has been reduced from more than 9 per cent of GDP in 2020-21 to the targeted level of 5.1 per cent for 2024-25. This has strengthened the macroeconomic fundamentals of the economy. S&P Global Rating raised India’s sovereign rating outlook to ‘positive’ from ‘stable’, citing the country’s improving finances and strong economic growth.

After having presented an interim budget ahead of the Lok Sabha polls, the Finance Minister will now present the full budget for 2024-25 that ensures the economy continues on the high growth trajectory and creates more jobs during the third term of the Modi government.

Sitharaman is expected to increase the exemption limit for income tax to give some relief to the middle class. This would place more disposable income in the hands of consumers and lead to an increase in demand to fuel economic growth.

ALSO READ-Indian Auto Parts Revenue to Rise 7% in FY25

Categories
Business India News USA

India, US Extend 2% Digital Tax on E-commerce

On February 15, 2024, the United States AND Austria, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom decided to extend the political compromise set forth in the October 21 Joint Statement until June 30, 2024…reports Asian Lite News

India and the United States have agreed to extend the 2 per cent equalisation levy or digital tax on e-commerce supplies until June 30.

On Oct 8, 2021, both countries joined 134 other members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework (including Austria, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) in reaching agreement on the Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution of OECD/G20, to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalization of the Economy.

On November 24, 2021, India and the United States agreed that the same terms that apply under the October 21 Joint Statement shall apply between India and the United States with respect to India’s charge of 2% equalisation levy on e-commerce supply of services and the United States trade action with respect to the said Equalisation Levy.

The validity of this agreement was from 1st April 2022 till the implementation of Pillar One or 31st March 2024, whichever is earlier. This was stated in public statements made by both sides on November 24 Statements.

On February 15, 2024, the United States AND Austria, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom decided to extend the political compromise set forth in the October 21 Joint Statement until June 30, 2024.

“In light of the above developments, India and the United States have decided to extend the validity of the agreement reflected in November 24 Statements until June 30, 2024. All other terms of the transitional approach remain the same,” the finance ministry’s release said

The OECD/G20 two-pillar solution addresses the tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy and aims to modernize the international tax framework.

This pillar introduces a global minimum corporate tax rate to prevent tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). The minimum tax rate ensures that MNEs pay at least a minimum level of tax regardless of where they are headquartered or where they operate.

It also mandates to implementation of Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules to ensure that foreign income is taxed to restore a level playing field and eliminate the need for countries to offer very low tax rates in order to compete for inbound investment.

The Finance Ministry further added in the statement that both countries will remain in close contact to ensure that there is a common understanding of the respective commitment and endeavour to resolve all issues on this matter through constructive dialogue. (ANI)

ALSO READ-Fighting for third day in north Gaza as thousands displaced

Categories
Business Economy India News

Industry seeks tax reforms during meet with revenue secy

The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) emphasized the need for a significant increase in government capital expenditure, proposing a 25 per cent rise compared to the 16.8 per cent increment outlined in the interim budget…reports Asian Lite News

In a series of pre-budget consultations, industry leaders from the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI), and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) presented a slew of recommendations aimed at bolstering economic growth, enhancing ease of doing business, and fostering sustainable development.

The meetings with Revenue Secretary Sanjay Malhotra and his team highlighted key areas for government focus in the upcoming Union Budget.

The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) emphasized the need for a significant increase in government capital expenditure, proposing a 25 per cent rise compared to the 16.8 per cent increment outlined in the interim budget.

The CII’s focus is on creating rural infrastructure, including irrigation systems, warehousing, and cold chain facilities, to support agricultural productivity and rural economic growth.

CII suggested, “To boost consumption demand in the short term, steps such as providing a marginal relief in income tax at the lower end of the spectrum with taxable income upto Rs 20 lakhs; reduction in excise duties on Petrol and Diesel: upward revision of minimum wages of MNREGA; raising DBT amount under PM Kisan”.

CII also proposed a mission on Advanced Manufacturing and Advanced Materials to enhance India’s manufacturing capabilities.

They emphasized the need for a strong focus on agriculture and rural development, suggesting the creation of non-farm rural jobs through village-level entrepreneurship and the development of integrated rural business hubs.

Furthermore, CII called for the establishment of a Green Transition Fund to support the decarbonization of industries, particularly for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs).

They also highlighted the need for a National Mission on Water Security and proposed an employment-linked incentive scheme for labor-intensive sectors with high growth potential.

The CII’s comprehensive suggestions included the creation of a Social Security Fund for gig and platform workers and the formulation of a roadmap to increase public expenditure on health to 3 per cent of GDP and education to 6 per cent of GDP by 2030.

They also proposed the next set of Goods and Services Tax (GST) reforms, advocating for a three-tier GST structure and the inclusion of petroleum, real estate, and electricity under the GST regime.

The PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI) met with Revenue Secretary Sanjay Malhotra to discuss their budget recommendations.

Hemant Jain, Senior Vice President of PHDCCI, called for an increase in personal tax exemptions and a reduction in penalization clauses to simplify the tax system and ease the burden on taxpayers.

He said, “We recommended that personal tax exemptions should be increased. Additionally, penalization clauses, which the government has reduced over the last two terms, should be further minimized. The government must ensure ease of doing business and avoid repetitiveness in the taxation procedure, ensuring that common people are not harassed.”

Mukul Bagla, Chair of the Direct Taxes Committee at PHDCCI, highlighted the heavy tax burden on the Indian middle class, particularly those earning Rs 15 lakhs or more. (ANI)

ALSO READ-Labour rules out changes to council tax bands

Categories
-Top News Politics UK News

Labour rules out changes to council tax bands

Current laws stipulate that any local authority wanting to raise council tax by 5% or more has to hold a referendum first…reports Asian Lite News

Labour have said they will not change council tax bands if they win the general election. The party has promised to not raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, but has avoided making explicit commitments on other taxes, including council tax bands.

However, Labour minister Jonathan Ashworth said: “No increase in income tax, no increase in national insurance, no increase in VAT or corporation tax. We’re not doing council tax re-banding.”

But, he would not specifically rule out a rise in fuel or stamp duty.

He added: “We have outlined that all our policies are fully funded, they do not require additional tax increases.”

Current laws stipulate that any local authority wanting to raise council tax by 5% or more has to hold a referendum first. Labour politicians, including shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves, have previously called for a council tax revaluation as current rates are based on house prices from 1991.

Some parts of London have seen prices rise by more than 800% in that time, whereas in places like Hartlepool, they have barely tripled, according to the Land Registry.

In Wales, the Labour Party has promised to introduce new council tax bands and tax band rates, but that has been pushed back to 2028.

Labour leader Keir Starmer has described the Welsh Labour government as a “blueprint for what Labour can do across the UK”, and has spoken about his desire to reform local authority funding.

Asked earlier this month whether he would rule out a council tax review in England, Starmer said council tax was “too high for too many people”, and he was “not wanting to raise tax”.

Torsten Bell, Labour candidate for Swansea West and head of thinktank the Resolution Foundation, wrote about the need for revaluation in his book, Great Britain? How To Get Our Future Back.

“It’s time to bite the bullet and carry out a revaluation of properties in England and Scotland (Wales has already done it),” he wrote.

“We need to either add more bands, increase the bill variation between them, or move to a fully proportional tax on property values.”

Reacting to Ashworth saying Labour will not change council tax bands, the Conservative chief secretary to the Treasury, Laura Trott, said: “Rachel Reeves has failed to rule out increasing council tax, and this morning Jonathan Ashworth was making it up as he went along. Labour are in chaos on tax.

“Labour are already introducing higher council tax bands and a full council tax revaluation in Wales. So it is time Keir Starmer comes clean with the British public and admits council tax will be higher under Labour in England too. The £38.5bn black hole in their manifesto means there would be at least a £2,094 tax bill for working families under Labour. And that’s just the start, Wes Streeting admitted their manifesto is not the ‘sum total’ of their future spending.”

Separately on Monday, Mr Shapps said he was a “realist” and would not “try and pretend black is white” by claiming the Conservatives are on course for victory.

He told Times Radio it was “possible [for the Conservatives] to win the election”, but conceded it is “not the most likely outcome”, adding: “I’m a realist.”

Asked if a Tory victory is unlikely, he replied: “I think that’s the realistic position, isn’t it? I mean, I live in the real world. So, you know, let’s not try and pretend black is white.”

So why are the Conservatives adopting this strategy?

Labour says the focus on tax is a sign of how “desperate” the Tory campaign is, but Conservative insiders think they’re planting doubt in voters’ minds over Keir Starmer’s economic policy and limiting his room for manoeuvre if he becomes prime minister.

Homes in Wales were revalued over the last 12-months, creating new property bands that could raise council tax for over 470,000 homes and reduce it for about 800,000 households.

Defence Secretary Grant Shapps accused Labour of secretly planning to copy the scheme to pay for “unfunded spending promises”.

“Once you start getting into the details, we know they plan to reband the council tax as they have done where Labour runs things in Wales,” he said.

Labour is selling itself as the party of “wealth creation”, with the aim of improving living standards for working people. Remove inflation and the typical person is only 5% better off than they were at the end of the 2008/2009 financial crisis.

Central to Labour’s pitch is its claim that it will encourage more investment, something that has been languishing since 2016. It hopes this will lead to more funding for training, skills, technology and buildings which, economists say, would make us more efficient. It’s that, the amount we each produce per hour – or productivity – where the UK lags behind many international peers.

But businesses need more than good intentions. There are relatively few actual policies, apart from reforms to planning and education, to encourage such business spending. And while there are £3.5bn of public “green” investments, including upgrading homes and investing in hydrogen, it’s a fraction of the package worth hundreds of billions deployed in the US by President Biden.

Official projections have the economy growing over the next few years, although there’s always the risk unexpected events blow things off course. The question is how much these plans would add and how soon. Investments typically take years to pay off and impact our pockets.

ALSO READ-US, India to initiate quantum tech cooperation  

Categories
-Top News Economy UK News

‘Tax may go up if insurance scrapped’

Some Tory MPs now believe the Conservative party is planning to make scrapping NI an election manifesto commitment…reports Asian Lite News

Income tax may eventually have to be raised to pay for abolishing national insurance, Jeremy Hunt has suggested the day after delivering the government’s spring budget.

The chancellor spent about £10bn to cut NI by 2p in the budget, and has indicated that the government’s eventual ambition is to scrap the tax entirely.

Asked how he would pay for this, Hunt told Sky News: “We’re not saying that this is going to happen anytime soon, and indeed that’s not the only way that you can end that unfairness of taxing work: you can merge income tax and national insurance.”

It suggests that the government is looking at raising income tax as one way of paying for abolishing NI, whose existence Hunt said was “unfair” as it amounted to a “double tax on work”.

Some Tory MPs now believe the Conservative party is planning to make scrapping NI an election manifesto commitment. Labour said the move would cost £46bn a year, equivalent to £230bn over the course of a five-year parliament, and questioned how the Tories would pay for it.

Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “At the end of the budget statement after an hour and 10 minutes, the chancellor started floating this idea of getting rid of national insurance altogether.

“I think it is really irresponsible to start making promises without having the faintest idea of where the money is going to come from. The last time ministers attempted this it was Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng. They made £45bn of uncosted and unfunded tax cuts. The chancellor yesterday suggested £46bn of unfunded tax cuts.”

In broadcast interviews on Wednesday and Thursday, the chancellor stressed he wanted to “end the unfairness” of the system but that eliminating NI contributions altogether would be a “huge thing to do”. He admitted that the tax would not be scrapped “any time soon”.

Any rise in income tax would affect pensioners, who do not pay national insurance. Some Tories criticised the decision to cut NI rather than income tax in the budget on Wednesday because of this.

Hunt insisted to Sky that the government had done an “enormous amount for pensioners” and that ultimately growing the economy would help to increase the state pension. “This government introduced the triple lock … we have really prioritised pensioners,” he said.

Experts from the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation, two influential economics thinktanks, said the budget left the “big picture” largely unchanged because overall taxation was still rising as a result of fiscal drag.

In analysis published overnight, the Resolution Foundation said the budget showed real household disposable income was set to fall by 0.9%, making this parliament – between 2019 and 2025 – the first in modern history in which living standards have dropped.

The IFS director, Paul Johnson, said the chancellor had used “smoke and mirrors”, while Torsten Bell of the Resolution Foundation said Wednesday’s tax cuts relied on the prospect of £19bn of post-election tax rises and “the fiscal fiction that another £19bn of cuts to public services can be delivered”.

Hunt also warned he ‘can’t afford’ to go further on taxes yet amid warnings the Budget package was ‘not enough’ to turn the tide at an election.

He also delivered a strong hint that the Conservative manifesto could include an ambition of scrapping the levy altogether, condemning it as ‘complex’ and unfair.

However, the overall burden is still rising and many Tories had been pushing for him to target income tax, sparking complaints there was nothing ‘vivid’ to win back voters in the package.

Concerns have been fuelled further by analysis from the Resolution Foundation pointing out that pensioners – regarded as key Tory supporters – have ended up the losers.

That is despite the fact that those who draw income from their private and workplace pensions are paying more tax as a result of stealth taxes – to the tune of £960 a year on average.

In a round of interviews from Liverpool this morning, Hunt acknowledged that taxes had gone up to cope with the impact of Covid. ‘I’m not pretending that I brought all those taxes down in one go. We can’t afford to do that,’ he told Times Radio.

‘It wouldn’t be responsible to do that. But do I want to carry on bringing them down, as I did yesterday, as I did in the autumn statement? Yes, I do.’ 

ALSO READ-Hunt seeks to win over voters with £900 tax cut

Categories
News

Hunt seeks to win over voters with £900 tax cut

Chancellor of the Exchequer also announced another 2 percentage-point cut to the national insurance payroll tax, following a similar move in Nov…reports Asian Lite News

Jeremy Hunt cut personal taxes as the Conservative Party tries to win back voters ahead of a nationwide election expected later this year.

Delivering his budget, the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced another 2 percentage-point cut to the national insurance payroll tax, following a similar move in November. Taken together, he said, 27 million employees will get an average tax cut of £900 (€1,052) a year. He also said the UK’s budget watchdog had upgraded the country’s growth prospects for this year and next.

“We know that lower-taxed economies have more energy, more dynamism, and more innovation,” Hunt said in the House of Commons on Wednesday. “We have today put this country back on the path to lower taxes.”

The tax cut is a central part of the Tories’ strategy to close a 20-point gap to the opposition Labour Party in national polls, prior to an election that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak must call by January 25 at the latest. But Hunt was constrained by fragile public finances with the UK entering a recession last year, and the chancellor went into his budget with just £12.2bn (€14.26bn) of breathing space against his key fiscal rule, a margin near historic lows.

Hunt barely kept his budget within the self-imposed rule to have the ratio of borrowing to GDP falling in the final year of his five-year forecast period. He did so by raising taxes by extending a windfall tax on the profits of oil and gas companies and overhauling a tax break for foreigners moving to the UK.

After the change, foreigners arriving in the UK will have a four-year hiatus on tax on their overseas assets, before paying the same rate as Britons. The current non-dom regime lasts for 15 years but with an annual fee.

In a move that appeared designed to get more houses onto the market, Hunt announced a reduction in property capital gains tax and the end of a tax break for people renting out second homes as short-term lets for tourists. Hunt also said the threshold at which families start to lose child benefits will rise by £10,000 in April.

Other budget measures included a freeze on fuel and alcohol duty, a new tax on vaping, and a hike in air passenger duty on business travel.

The Conservatives were given a boost by the rosier growth forecasts from the OBR: Hunt said growth is now due to be 0.8% in 2024, up from the previous estimate of 0.7%. The watchdog is now predicting 1.9% growth for 2025, compared to a previous reading of 1.4%, Hunt said.

Hunt also said he wouldn’t be reducing future public spending plans, an option he’d been considering to help finance his tax cuts. Still, critics have said the 1% increase in spending Hunt is baking in — which involves real terms cuts for unprotected departments — would be politically unsustainable. Hunt didn’t detail his plans, but said boosting public sector productivity would be a key priority.

The budget measures will increase the UK tax burden by 1.1 percentage points, the OBR said.

“The hidden sting in the tail is the continued frozen tax thresholds which will eat into any savings” from the national insurance cut, Christine Cairns, tax partner at PwC, said in an emailed statement.

The chancellor is navigating the constraints of fragile public finances and a stagnant economy that entered a shallow technical recession at the end of 2023.

Inflation has fallen faster than anticipated and market expectations for interest rates are well below where they were prior to Hunt’s Autumn Statement in November, but many British households are still feeling the cost of living squeeze, while public services remain extremely stretched.

Former British finance minister Philip Hammond said it would be a mistake not to have a system in place that encourages so-called “non-doms” to reside in the U.K.

Non-domiciled tax status allows people who are based, but not settled, in the country to only pay U.K. tax on money made in the country. As part of the Spring Budget statement, U.K. Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt said on Wednesday that this would be scrapped and replaced with a new system.

“It would be a massive own goal to remove non-dom taxation and then see a big outflow of investment from the U.K.,” Hammond told CNBC’s Silvia Amaro on Wednesday.

“It would be a mistake to have no regime in place that encouraged people in those circumstances to base themselves in the U.K.,” he said. “If we said for example to people that they have to pay tax on their worldwide assets if they come and spend time in the U.K. I think that would probably be detrimental to the U.K. economy in the long term.”

Hammond said the integrity of the policy would now depend on the details of Hunt’s new plan.

Hammond was broadly positive about the statement, saying it was “a careful and thoughtful budget from a careful and thoughtful Chancellor.”

He also said that he would like to see lower taxes eventually, but that public services needed to be taken into account. “In the future we need higher productivity, higher economic growth, so we can reconcile this tension between the desire for good public services and the desire to keep taxes at a bearable level.”

ALSO READ-Will Hunt Spring A Surprise?

Categories
-Top News Economy UK News

Will Hunt Spring A Surprise?

Jeremy Hunt will use his final budget before the election to promise voters lower tax and higher growth, with the chancellor set to announce a 2p cut to national insurance…reports Asian Lite News

Jeremy Hunt will use his final budget before the election to promise voters lower tax and higher growth, with the chancellor set to announce a 2p cut to national insurance, even at the expense of public services.

Sources said Hunt had decided to reduce national insurance for the second time in less than six months, having defied calls from some in Downing Street and across the party for a more expensive pre-election income tax cut.

The chancellor will frame the move as a push for growth, opportunity and prosperity, having brushed off concerns among many Tories that cutting national insurance would not be enough to overturn the party’s 20-point deficit to Labour in the polls.

But he is likely to impose strict spending limits to come in after the election to help pay for the tax cuts, causing some in his party to worry that voters will punish them for cutting services rather than rewarding them for lowering taxes.

Hunt will say: “Conservatives know lower tax means higher growth. And higher growth means more opportunity and more prosperity. But if we want that growth to lead to higher wages and higher living standards for every family in every corner of the country, it cannot come from unlimited migration. It can only come by building a high-wage, high-skill economy. Not just higher GDP, but higher GDP per head.”

In a message designed to bolster the pre-election message that a Labour government would take the country backwards, Hunt will add: “Instead of going back to square one, our plans mean more investment, more jobs, more productive public services and lower taxes.”

However, Labour will attempt to focus the debate on declining living standards. Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, said: “The Conservatives promised to fix the nation’s roof, but instead they have smashed the windows, kicked the door in and are now burning the house down.”

In his post-budget response, the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, will say taxes will rise for most families even after the budget, given that thresholds for national insurance and income tax continue to be frozen in cash terms.

An analysis by the Resolution Foundation thinktank on Tuesday showed that only those paid between £27,000 and £59,000 a year would be better off as a result of both the autumn statement and Wednesday’s budget. Those paid £16,000 would lose almost £500 a year, as would those receiving more than £60,000.

Hunt and Rishi Sunak have spent the last few weeks trying to find enough money for a tax cut on the scale of last November’s autumn statement, when the chancellor reduced national insurance from 12% to 10%.

The chancellor has been hampered by forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility that showed he had less money than he had hoped to be able to spend without breaking his promise to have debt beginning to fall in five years’ time.

Hunt is preparing however to announce a series of targeted tax rises to help pay for the national insurance cut. They include limiting tax breaks to non-doms, introducing a levy on vaping products, increasing taxes on short-term holiday lets, extending the energy windfall tax and increasing taxes on business-class flights. Together these measures are expected to raise about £5bn a year.

More controversially, Hunt is preparing to defy economists’ warnings of an impending public services crunch and reduce his forecasts for departmental spending after the election.

The plans he set out in November assumed departmental budgets would rise 1% above inflation each year after the election, all of which would be soaked up by protected departments such as health and defence. However, the chancellor is set to reduce that figure to just 0.75%, meaning unprotected areas such as justice and local government would face cuts of up to 20% over the course of the parliament.

The plans have sparked concern among some in the Tory party, who point to a series of polls showing that voters would prefer higher public spending and higher taxes than the promise of immediate tax cuts.

“The tax cuts are going to require even more unrealistic public service cuts post-election,” said one Tory insider. “There is already a big argument about whether the public will react more badly to that than they do positively to the tax cuts themselves.”

Hunt decided to reduce national insurance despite some in No 10 pushing for a cut to income tax instead, which they argued would be more easily understood by voters. Since announcing November’s national insurance move, the Conservatives have fallen one point further behind Labour in the polls.

One Tory MP said: “It didn’t work last time round, what makes them think it will be any different this time?”

But the chancellor argued that focusing on national insurance would be less inflationary, and unlike income tax would apply to the whole of the UK.

Many Tory MPs also expect the prime minister to promise further tax cuts in the election manifesto, including as large as 4p from income tax.

“It would create a clear dividing line with Labour,” said one. “There’s no way that they could match that.”

Hunt is also preparing to make other tax cuts on Wednesday, including another freeze in fuel duty.

Sources have said he is also likely to continue the freeze in alcohol duty that he announced last year but is set to run out this August.

Sunak will visit two pubs in different parts of the country this week, sparking speculation among industry sources that the chancellor could go even further and announce a temporary cut in VAT and business rates for the hospitality industry. Pubs, restaurants and hotels have been campaigning heavily for such a move given that so many hospitality businesses have closed in recent years as a result of spiralling costs.

ALSO READ-Labour seeks deeper UK-India cooperation  

Categories
-Top News UK News

Hunt may extend energy windfall tax by a year

Hunt raised the tax in November 2022 from its initial 25% rate to 35%, bringing the overall tax burden on North Sea oil and gas producers to 75%, among the highest in the world…reports Asian Lite News

Finance minister Jeremy Hunt is expected to announce a one-year extension of a windfall levy on energy firms’ profits in this week’s budget, industry sources briefed on the move said.

The energy profit levy (EPL) was introduced in May 2022 after a jump in energy prices resulting from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Hunt raised the tax in November 2022 from its initial 25% rate to 35%, bringing the overall tax burden on North Sea oil and gas producers to 75%, among the highest in the world.

The British chancellor also extended the tax to 2028 from 2025 and expanded it to electricity generators with a levy of 45% in an effort to raise tens of billions of pounds to plug a major hole in public finances.

In his annual tax-and-spend speech on Wednesday, Hunt is expected to extend the levy by one more year to 2029. The tax rate, as well as a 29% investment allowance in the windfall tax that allows companies to offset spending, would remain unchanged, the sources said.

Britain’s finance ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. North Sea producers have warned in the past that the higher levy would lead to lower investment in the country’s oil and gas output.

Over the weekend, Hunt sought to dampen speculation about big pre-election tax cuts in this week’s budget, saying there had been a worsening in the economic outlook, but he hinted at some help for voters.

Meanwhile, industry leaders have hit out at reported plans from Chancellor Jeremy Hunt to extend the life of the windfall tax during next week’s Spring Budget.

According to a report from Bloomberg, the Chancellor is considering extending the levy, due to expire in March 2028.

The same report said the move is “low down the list of potential measures under consideration” – so it may not happen – and the Treasury didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Maintaining the energy levy for an extra year would increase the tax take in 2028-2029, the crucial fifth year of the OBR’s forecast horizon during which Hunt’s own fiscal rules state that the national debt must be falling. That would give him a bit of extra breathing space to ease other taxes.

ALSO READ-Economy is on the right track, claims Sunak

Categories
-Top News UK News

Hunt dampens hopes of tax cuts  

The Chancellor of the Exchequer had been widely expected to cut taxes in Wednesday’s budget, in a move seen as a way of closing the gap on the main Opposition Labour Party ahead of elections…reports Asian Lite News

Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt talked down the likelihood of tax cuts in this week’s budget, pledging “prudent and responsible” measures “for long term growth”.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer had been widely expected to cut taxes in Wednesday’s budget, in a move seen as a way of closing the gap on the main Opposition Labour Party ahead of elections.

Rishi Sunak’s Conservative Party is trailing in the polls with pollsters predicting that Labour leader Keir Starmer in on track to win the keys to number 10 Downing Street at a general election later this year.

Voters, hit by a cost of living crisis, have repeatedly punished the Conservatives in a string of recent by-elections.

With the Bank of England’s main interest rate sitting at a 16-year high of 5.25%, millions of voters are also suffering from soaring mortgage repayments.

“It’s going to be a prudent and responsible budget for long term growth,” Hunt told Sky News television channel. Official data last month showed Britain had sunk into recession after the economy shrank in the final two quarters of 2023.

While economists predicted that the recession could be short-lived, the data has been a big setback for Sunak, who has placed economic growth as a key priority.

But Hunt said he would not cut taxes at the expense of future generations. “I think the most unconservative thing I could do would be to cut taxes by increasing borrowing,” he told the BBC.

“Because that’s just cutting taxes and saying that future generations have to pick the tax up,” he added.

Although he would not be drawn on tax measures expected in the budget, Hunt did announce an £800 million ($1.01 billion) package of technology reforms designed to make public services more efficient and reduce paperwork.

As part of the package, police will use drones to assess incidents such as traffic collisions and artificial intelligence (AI) will be deployed to speed up the results of cancer scans in the state-run National Health Service.

“There is too much waste in the system and we want public servants to get back to doing what matters most: teaching our children, keeping us safe and treating us when we’re sick,” Mr. Hunt said in a statement.

According to The Sunday Times, the Office for Budget Responsibility told Hunt on Wednesday that he has £12.8 billion of headroom to play with — more than £2 billion less than the figure the Treasury is said to have previously been basing its calculations on.

After a shallow recession in 2023, the economy looks set to grow only slowly in 2024 while demands are mounting for spending on stretched public services and investment. Debt has soared to almost 100% of economic output after the COVID pandemic and the surge in energy prices hammered the public finances. 

Nonetheless, Hunt and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak are under pressure to cut taxes to help the party’s flagging fortunes before a national election expected later this year. 

Many Conservative lawmakers say the budget represents the last chance of turning around the centre-left opposition Labour Party’s 20-point lead in opinion polls. 

Speaking to Sky News on Sunday, Hunt said he would like to cut taxes further possibly as soon as Wednesday. 

“What you saw in the Autumn Statement was a turning point, when we cut two pence off the National Insurance rate. We will hope to make some progress on that journey, but we’re going to do so in a responsible way,” Hunt told the broadcaster.

British bond markets went into a slump 18 months ago when former Prime Minister Liz Truss and finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng promised sweeping and unfunded tax cut plans which had to be quickly reversed by Hunt. 

In November, he announced some cuts to business and payroll taxes but the overall tax burden is still rising, largely because thresholds for paying many taxes have not risen in line with inflation. 

Media reports have speculated about possible cuts to income tax rates, another social security cut or the relaxation of the threshold freezes. 

Budget experts have said Hunt might again claim that he can afford to cut taxes now by making unrealistic promises of a squeeze on public services that are already under huge strain. 

Reports have also cited a possible tightening of tax rules for so-called “non-dom” residents on their overseas earnings. 

Hunt focused on another way that he could carve out a bit more fiscal wiggle room, telling BBC television on Sunday he would “rethink our whole approach to public spending.” The finance ministry said on Saturday it planned to improve public sector productivity which would deliver up to 1.8 billion pounds ($2.3 billion) of worth of benefits annually by 2029. 

ALSO READ-Hunt to allow private firms to trade shares on exchanges