Categories
-Top News USA

Trump Faces 91 Criminal Charges Across Four Cases

A vast majority of Democrats – 90% – said they won’t vote for him if he was convicted or jailed…reports Asian Lite News

A conviction for former President Donald Trump on any of the 91 criminal charges he is facing across four separate cases will not prevent him from running for the White House but it will cost him the support of a third of his own Republican party voters and Independents, according to polls, and deprive him of his own vote.

Trump is currently on trial in Manhattan in a case of falsification of business records in regard to hush-money he allegedly paid an adult porn star in 2016 for not going public with their affair.

He is facing 34 charges in the case, each of which carries the punishment of four years in jail. But a conviction will not land him in prison immediately as he will be able to appeal it in the appellate court and eventually the Supreme Court.

The other three cases have not gone on trial yet.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll in February found that while the majority of Americans – 55 per cent – will not vote for Trump if he is either convicted or is in jail, a third of Republicans – 32 per cent – said they won’t, and 24 per cent said they were not sure yet of what they will do.

A vast majority of Democrats – 90% – said they won’t vote for him if he was convicted or jailed.

Another poll by Ipsos, done with Politico magazine in Month, found that a third of Independent voters said they would be less likely to support Trump if he were to be convicted in the Justice Department’s case against him for trying to subvert the 2020 election through the January 6 insurrection and the Manhattan case of falsifying business records.

Independent voters are critical in determining the electoral outcomes in the handful of swing states that decide the presidential election every cycle.

The poll did not cover views about the two other cases, mishandling of classified documents and trying to overturn the 2020 vote count in Georgia.

A conviction would not, however, stop him from running. The US Constitution only lays down three qualification rules for running for President: 35 years of age, a natural-born citizen, and a resident of the US for 14 years.

There are no rules on criminals and felons, and although some states have barred felons from running, these rules do not apply to elections for federal offices. But a conviction will take away his vote in Florida, where he lives.

People convicted of a felony are disenfranchised by Florida state law till the completion of the jail sentence or payment of a fine. Felons can, however, apply for a waiver from the Governor.

He could, however, switch to New York state where he has lived most of his life to keep his vote because of the more permissive rules, which allow felons to vote during parole or probation.

But if he is imprisoned, he will lose his vote. Only the states of Vermont, Maine, and Washington DC allow felons to vote.

The four cases against Trump

Falsification of business records, Manhattan, New York: Trump faces 34 charges of falsifying records to pay Stormy Daniels, an adult film star, to keep quiet about an affair they had in 2005 (he has denied the affair). The money was paid to Daniels by Michael Cohen, a one-time fixer for Trump, and he was later reimbursed as legal fees.

Mishandling of classified documents: The US Justice Department has charged Trump with 40 counts for carrying away classified documents from the White House at the end of his term. He had held on to them despite requests from the National Archives, which is the custodian of all presidential records. President Joe Biden was also found later to have carried away classified documents after his two terms as Vice President in 2016.

January 6 efforts to overturn 2020 presidential election: The US Justice Department has also charged Trump with four counts for instigating supporters to attack the US Capitol, home to the US Congress, to stop a joint sitting of the two chambers to prevent the certification of Biden as the winner of the 2020 presidential election.

Georgia state efforts to overturn 2020 vote count: The former President faces 13 counts of conspiring with his accomplices over the vote count in the state to overturn his defeat to Biden into victory.

ALSO READ-Prosecution alleges ‘criminal conspiracy’ in Trump trial

Categories
-Top News UK News

Prince Harry settles case against tabloid publisher

Judge Timothy Fancourt found that Harry’s phone was hacked “to a modest extent.” The settlement avoids new trials over 115 more tabloid articles that Harry says were the product of hacking or other intrusions...reports Asian Lite News

Prince Harry said Friday that his “mission” to rein in the British media continues, after he accepted costs and damages from a tabloid publisher that invaded his privacy with phone hacking and other illegal snooping.

Harry’s attorney, David Sherborne, said at a court hearing that Mirror Group Newspapers had agreed to pay all of the prince’s legal costs, plus “substantial” damages, and would make an interim payment of 400,000 pounds ($505,000) within 14 days. The final tab will be assessed later. Harry said he had been vindicated, and vowed: “Our mission continues.” “We have uncovered and proved the shockingly dishonest way in which the Mirror acted for so many years, and then sought to conceal the truth,” the 39-year-old royal said in a statement read outside the High Court in London by his lawyer. Harry was awarded 140,000 pounds ($177,000) in damages in December, after a judge found that phone hacking was “widespread and habitual” at Mirror Group Newspapers in the late 1990s, went on for more than a decade and that executives at the papers covered it up.

Judge Timothy Fancourt found that Harry’s phone was hacked “to a modest extent.” The settlement avoids new trials over 115 more tabloid articles that Harry says were the product of hacking or other intrusions. Mirror Group said in a statement that it was “pleased to have reached this agreement, which gives our business further clarity to move forward from events that took place many years ago and for which we have apologized.”

Harry’s case against the publisher of the Daily Mirror is one of several that he has launched in a campaign against the British media, which he blames for blighting his life and hounding both his late mother Princess Diana and his wife Meghan. In June, he became the first senior member of the royal family in more than a century to testify in court during the trial of his case against the Mirror.

ALSO READ-Prince Harry returns to be at King Charles’ side

Categories
-Top News USA

Hunter Biden Indicted for Tax Evasion in California

In September, Hunter Biden was indicted on separate gun-related charges…reports Asian Lite News

US President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden was indicted in California on nine counts related to a Justice Department investigation into his taxes, the media reported.

According to the indictment, filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, the charges include failure to file and pay taxes, evading a tax assessment, and filing a false or fraudulent tax return, Xinhua news agency reported.

The indictment, the second criminal case that Special Counsel David Weiss has brought against the president’s son, showed that Hunter Biden engaged in a four-year scheme to not pay at least 1.4 million US dollars in federal taxes between 2016 and 2019.

Weiss first began investigating the president’s son five years ago as the US attorney for Delaware, appointed by former US President Donald Trump.

In September, Hunter Biden was indicted on separate gun-related charges.

Less than a year ahead of the 2024 presidential election, the US president will be fighting a Republican impeachment bid while his son, the first child of a sitting president to be criminally indicted, struggles to avoid prison in two criminal cases.

ALSO READ-Trump’s Shadow Looms Large as Focus Shifts to Biden’s Performance

Categories
-Top News USA

Trump’s right to free speech on Jan 6 event not absolute, says judge

Trump pleaded not guilty to four criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election last week, and the judge warned Trump about any possible intimidation of witnesses…reports Asian Lite News

The judge hearing former US President Donald Trump’s case of alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 elections, said on Friday that although the former President has rights to free speech, these rights are “not absolute”, CNN reported.

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan also said that she plans to put serious limits on how sensitive evidence is handled in the Donald Trump 2020 election interference case.

The former president has a right to free speech, but that right is “not absolute,” Chutkan said. “Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech, but that right is not absolute. In a criminal case such as this one, the defendant’s free speech is subject to the rules,” CNN quoted her as saying.

Notably, this is the first hearing before Chutkan. She has already shown a habit of responding quickly and tersely on the docket to debates between the parties over scheduling.

An Obama appointee and former public defender who has overseen several cases regarding the events of January 6, 2021, Chutkan has been outspoken about the harm the US Capitol attack caused to American democracy, as per CNN.

Trump pleaded not guilty to four criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election last week, and the judge warned Trump about any possible intimidation of witnesses.

The district judge said that “whether or not Trump’s public statements are covered by the protective order that’s issued if they result in the intimidation of a witness or the obstruction of justice, I will be scrutinizing them very carefully.”

Trump’s lawyer John Lauro said, “President Trump will scrupulously abide by his conditions of release,” CNN reported.

Chutkan also adopted restrictions proposed by prosecutors that would bar Trump from publicly disclosing information from interview transcripts and recordings from the investigation, including from witness interviews with investigators that took place outside of the grand jury.

Notably, the way Chutkan handles the case is likely to serve as a contrast to US District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee in Florida who has been in less of a rush to move proceedings along in the classified documents case against the former president.

Cannon has already been heavily scrutinized for what the critics call “favorable treatment” of the former president in a previous lawsuit Trump brought last year challenging aspects of the Justice Department’s investigation, according to CNN. (ANI)

ALSO READ-Judge cautions Trump on trial influencing statements

Categories
Africa News

Court cases filed against Chinese company CRBC in Kenya

These projects inter-alia include construction of roads, highways, and provisions for water supply, sewer extensions, street lighting etc. CRBC has contracted various local vendors for supply of raw material etc…reports Asian Lite News

Chinese companies operating in Africa have often been accused of showing laxity in projects, not following the laid down safety protocols thereby resulting in accidents and loss of assets related to projects. In some countries, once the projects get underway, the Chinese companies are learnt to mount pressure on host countries/companies to circumvent local laws for their own benefits.

A recent case of malpractice that has come to the fore is that of breach of contract by Chinese company China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC) in Kenya. Multiple infrastructure projects are being carried out by Chinese State Owned Enterprise (SoE) CRBC in Kenya under the umbrella of ‘Community Projects’. These projects inter-alia include construction of roads, highways, and provisions for water supply, sewer extensions, street lighting etc. CRBC has contracted various local vendors for supply of raw material etc.

Recently, several court cases have been filed against CRBC for failing to pay its sub-contractors in Kenya. In one such case, Tuk Chilo Ltd., a local Kenyan firm, alleged that CRBC had failed to pay over KES 44.3 million for the construction of various roads in Nairobi. Tuk Chilo Ltd. was subcontracted by CRBC to construct and upgrade roads in various informal settlements and densely populated areas in Nairobi Country. The business and operations of the Kenyan company have suffered irreparable loss and damages due to non-payment of dues.

In another case, JTG Enterprises Ltd served a ‘Demand Notice’ to CRBC for breach of contractual obligations viz. non-payment of dues. The notice accused CRBC of not releasing the retention money of the sub-contractors even after the passage of the default lock-in period and demanded that CRBC immediately and unconditionally admit liability for breach of the subcontract agreement. It asked CRBC to immediately release/pay retention money to JTG Enterprise that include two separate amounts viz. KES 19,89,921/- and 5,19,321/-. The notice further underlines that if the amount was not paid within seven days, legal proceedings may be initiated against CRBC. If the above payments are made in time, the two sides would then proceed to discuss the amount to be paid by CRBC to JTG Enterprises in lieu of damages for breach of contract.

Unconfirmed sources suggest that another local company MESTEC Cables Ltd. has also sent an invoice to CRBC amounting to around KES 60,000/-. The company is working as supplier to CRBC and is primarily engaged in manufacturing of steel bars and other material used in building and construction. Probably, another case is in the offing against CRBC as it is most likely to default on this vendor’s payment as well.

Taking into account above cases, the Kenyan government must realize that the integrity of Chinese companies is always doubtful. They suffer from poor image in corporate ethics. Corruption and criminality are often associated with Chinese funded projects. Before signing the contracts, the Kenyan government must ensure that these contracts have strict legal provisions that debar Chinese nationals from fleeing the country and put them behind bars in case of default on payment to local companies.

ALSO READ-CHINA’S DEBT TRAP DIPLOMACY: Kenya Goes Sri Lanka Way

Categories
-Top News India News

Rahul Gandhi convicted by Surat court, gets Bail

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was held guilty by a court in Surat in a 2019 criminal defamation case filed against him over his alleged ‘Modi surname’ remarks…reports Asian Lite News

The Surat District Court on Thursday sentenced Congress MP Rahul Gandhi to two years’ imprisonment in a criminal defamation case filed against him over his alleged ‘Modi surname’ remark.
He was later granted bail by the court.

 “The court has suspended the punishment for 30 days and granted bail to Rahul Gandhi,” said an advocate at Surat district court.
Meanwhile, Union law minister Kiren Rijiju outside Parliament said, “I will see the details of the order before I say anything. Whatever Rahul Gandhi speaks it always affects the Congress party and the entire nation in a negative way. Some Congress MPs told me that because of his attitude, Congress is suffering.”

Earlier today, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was held guilty by a court in Surat in a 2019 criminal defamation case filed against him over his alleged ‘Modi surname’ remarks.

The Surat District Court pronounced the verdict in the case for his alleged “how come all the thieves have Modi as the common surname?” remarks on a complaint lodged by BJP MLA and former Gujarat minister Purnesh Modi. Rahul Gandhi had made the alleged remarks about Modi’s surname at a rally in Karnataka’s Kolar, ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha election.

Last week, the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate HH Varma concluded hearing final arguments from both sides and set March 23 to pronounce its judgment in the four-year-old defamation case. (ANI)

ALSO READ-Rahul Gandhi urged to take over top party post

Categories
-Top News India News UK News

UK university loses discrimination case against Indian lecturer

She added that there was no adequate workplace support for her while she was caring for her critically-ill child…reports Asian Lite News

 An Indian lecturer has won a discrimination case against a UK university whose selection process, according to an employment tribunal, was “tainted by race discrimination”.

The University of Portsmouth failed to reappoint Dr Kajal Sharma for a job she had been doing for five years, replacing her with a white candidate with no experience of the role, The Guardian reported.

While 11 out of her 12 white colleagues were reappointed after their contracts ended, Sharma, hired as a senior lecturer in 2016, was not given her job back.

The tribunal in its judgement reprimanded the university for ignoring the fact that “a senior member of the academic staff who was a BAME (Black, Asian, and minority ethnic) woman was not reappointed to a post”.

At the case hearing in Southampton, Sharma informed the tribunal that she had a “difficult” relationship with her manager, Dr Gary Rees.

Citing an instance, she said Rees had asked her to do university work in the immediate aftermath of her father’s death.

She added that there was no adequate workplace support for her while she was caring for her critically-ill child.

Rees encouraged a white colleague to pursue an additional qualification but did not support Sharma when she wanted to do the same, the tribunal was told.

While reapplying for the job as her contract neared end, Sharma appeared before an interview panel, which had Rees, and lost out to a rival candidate supported by him.

The tribunal said that the fact that she was not reappointed to her job was “extraordinary” and should have raised questions.

“Instead, the fact that a senior member of the academic staff who was a BAME woman was not reappointed to a post was ignored by the university.”

The tribunal ruled that Sharma was the victim of subconscious discrimination and described the selection process as being “tainted by race discrimination”, The Guardian reported.

It concluded that Rees had treated Sharma “in a way that we considered was different to the way he would have treated others, in areas such as support over her father’s death, and her child’s illness.

“We conclude that his involvement in the recruitment process and his subconscious bias means that the failure to recruit the claimant was an act of race discrimination.”

According to a 2022 TUC (The Trades Union Congress) survey, more than 120,000 workers from minority ethnic backgrounds quit their jobs because of racism.

The landmark survey found that more than one in four workers from black and other minority ethnic backgrounds faced racist jokes at work in the last five years and 35 per cent said it left them feeling less confident at work.

ALSO READ-Indian American appointed Tufts University President

Categories
-Top News Kerala

CBI to probe ISRO espionage case

The 79-year-old Narayanan waged a legal battle against the Kerala police officers who accused him of being a Pakistan’s spy in 1994…reports Asian Lite News.

At last former ISRO scientist Nambi Narayanan’s case was handed over to CBI. The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered a CBI probe into the role of Kerala police officers in framing ISRO scientist Nambi Narayanan in the 1994 ISRO espionage case.

A bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar accepted the report of a panel headed by former top court judge D.K. Jain, and asked the CBI to carry out further investigation. The top court said the matter is very serious and it requires a CBI probe.

The bench asked acting CBI Director to take charge of the case and treat the report by Justice Jain panel as a preliminary inquiry report to conduct further investigations into the matter.

The bench also comprising Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Krishna Murari also asked the CBI to file status report on its investigations in three months. The top court has ordered that panel’s report should be kept confidential in a sealed cover.

The 79-year-old Narayanan waged a legal battle against the Kerala police officers who accused him of being a Pakistan’s spy in 1994. Besides appointing the panel, the top court had directed the Kerala government to pay Rs 50 lakh compensation to Narayanan for causing him immense humiliation.

In 2018, a bench of the then Chief Justice Dipak Misra decided to appoint a committee under Jain and asked the Centre and the Kerala government to name one person each to the committee. While the Centre appointed a top official — D.K. Prasad, the Pinarayi Vijayan government appointed former Additional Chief Secretary V.S. Senthil.

The ISRO spy case surfaced in 1994 when Narayanan was arrested on charges of espionage along with another senior official of ISRO, two Maldivian women and a businessman.

The CBI had held that the then top police officials in Kerala were responsible for Narayanan’s illegal arrest. The panel examined the circumstances leading to Narayanan’s arrest. It was alleged that confidential documents on India’s space program was allegedly transferred to foreign countries.

Narayanan had maintained that Kerala police fabricated the case and the technology he was accused to have stolen and sold in 1994 case did not even exist at that time.

Also Read-ISRO launches CARTOSAT-3, 13 nano satellites into space

Read More-CHANDRAYAN-2: ISRO Begins Countdown