Categories
-Top News Europe USA

Blinken announces new $2 bn military aid for Kyiv

The aid, in the form of new weapons systems and support for Ukraine’s defense industry, comes partially from a $61 billion package that the US Congress approved last month…reports Asian Lite News

The Biden administration will send further military aid worth $2 billion to Ukraine amid its ongoing conflict with Russia, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Wednesday (local time) as he concluded his two-day visit to Kyiv intended to underline Washington’s support, the Washington Post reported.

Blinken said the USD 2 billion for Ukraine would come in the form of a “first-of-its-kind defense enterprise fund” that would channel assistance to the country in the coming months.

The aid, in the form of new weapons systems and support for Ukraine’s defense industry, comes partially from a $61 billion package that the US Congress approved last month, while $400 million comes from a separate pool of money earmarked for general foreign defence aid, which is now being directed to Ukraine.

However, Blinken also stressed that the Biden administration remains opposed to Ukraine striking targets inside Russian territory with US weaponry — something Ukrainian policymakers have been pushing for with increasing urgency.

The visit coincided with Russian military advances that highlighted Ukraine’s defenses in an “extremely vulnerable” light.

Russia in recent days has mounted an assault on towns near Kharkiv — Ukraine’s second-largest city.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Wednesday cancelled a planned trip to Spain as concern mounted about the latest Russian assaults.

“We have not encouraged or enabled strikes outside of Ukraine,” Blinken told reporters Wednesday at the end of his first visit to Ukraine since September.

“But ultimately, Ukraine has to make decisions for itself about how it’s going to conduct this war, a war it is conducting in defense of its freedom, of its sovereignty, of its territorial integrity,” Blinken said. “And we will continue to back Ukraine with the equipment it needs to succeed.”

Notably, Ukraine is able to use weaponry supplied by other countries, including the United Kingdom, to hit targets on Russian soil, the White House has forbidden American equipment from being used to hit Russian territory for fear of inciting a direct military conflict with Russia, the Washington Post reported.

This has proved ‘frustrating’ for Ukraine, especially in recent weeks, as it witnessed a military build-up on Russian territory close to Kharkiv but found its ability to strike it very limited, the report added.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Dmytro Kuleba, appreciated the US help, but also acknowledged the “difficulties” faced by Kyiv due to more than six months of ‘congressional inaction’ that preceded April’s approval of the aid.

“Every delay of supply results in setbacks on the front line. This is the general rule,” Kuleba said. “When a Ukrainian infantryman or artilleryman has everything that he or she needs, we are winning. Every time there are delays in supplies and insufficient supplies, we are not winning. The law of war is cruel but very clear.”

The report cited analysts and US officials in stating that Russian forces do not appear poised to capture Kharkiv city, but that they are probably trying to cause enough of a challenge there to draw Ukrainian military assets away from other front-line positions farther south.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based independent research group, said Russia’s attack on the northeast Kharkiv region appeared to have slowed, indicating that it was probably an effort to create a buffer zone on the border, not an effort to capture the city. It added that Russia continued to make small but steady gains farther south, Washington Post reported.

Ukraine war.(photo:Instagram)

Russia intensifies attack

Meanwhile, Russia has escalated its campaign in Ukraine, employing psychological, tactical, and economic tactics to complicate Kyiv’s defence. The recent developments have prompted US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to acknowledge the challenges at hand, remarking on the “challenging moment” unfolding, Al Jazeera reported.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko highlighted the intensification, revealing Russian soldiers’ training with Belarusian military in tactical nuclear weapons. This move, coupled with the Kremlin’s insinuation of battlefield use in Ukraine, has heightened concerns.

“An escalation is ongoing. What should we do in this situation? We need to keep powder dry, including these lethal weapons,” Russian official news agency TASS quoted him as saying.

The Russian Army has opened a new front in Ukraine’s northern Kharkiv region, capturing villages near the border – an offensive Ukrainian officials had warned about days earlier, as reported by Al Jazeera.

President Vladimir Putin of Russia has made strategic manoeuvers, appointing an economist to streamline the Ministry of Defence and nationalise Russian defence industries. This action is interpreted by some observers as a signal of long-term preparations for potential conflict with NATO.

Russian forces have opened a new front in Ukraine’s northern Kharkiv region, seizing villages near the border, despite earlier warnings from Ukrainian officials. This escalation aims to divert resources, sow panic, and facilitate territorial gains, particularly in Ukraine’s eastern regions.

In response, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addressed the nation, acknowledging the intention behind the strikes in Kharkiv Oblast to undermine Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his Sunday evening address: “The intention of the strikes in Kharkiv Oblast is to stretch our forces and undermine the moral and motivational basis of Ukrainians’ ability to defend themselves.”

ALSO READ: ICC probing Ukraine, Gaza war crimes defies threats

ALSO READ: Russia intensifies attacks on Ukraine’s Kharkiv

Categories
-Top News Arab News UAE News

UAE President to visit Russia

UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan will pay a visit to Russia on Tuesday, during which he will meet with President Vladimir Putin.

During his visit, Sheikh Mohamed will discuss with President Putin the friendly relations between the UAE and Russia along with a number of regional and international issues and developments of common interest, state news agency WAM reported.

UAE top Arab destination for Russian investments

Last week, Saqr Ghobash, Speaker of the UAE Federal National Council (FNC), discussed with the Russian Federation Council Speaker, Valentina Matvienko, ways of enhancing cooperation between the two friendly countries, especially in the parliamentary field, in line with the support these relations enjoy from the leadership and governments of the two countries.

During the meeting ,which took place on the sidelines of the 8th G20 Parliamentary Speakers’ Summit in the Indonesian capital Jakarta, the two sides acknowledged the role of parliamentary diplomacy in serving state policies and strengthening international security and peace. They commended the mission of the eight-member IPU Task Force for the peaceful resolution of the crisis in Ukraine, led by MP Dr. Ali Al Nuaimi of the United Arab Emirates.

Saqr Ghobash stressed the importance of strengthening and continuity of communication, coordination and strategic parliamentary dialogue between the two sides, and unifying positions, visions and orientations on various issues of common interest in various regional and international parliamentary forums, especially in the Inter-Parliamentary Union, with the importance of exchanging experiences, knowledge and parliamentary practices.

For her part, Valentina Matvienko stressed the need for parliamentary relations keeping pace with the strategic partnership relations between the two countries, and the development they are witnessing at various economic, commercial, cultural, energy and technology levels.

The UAE is the first Arab destination for Russian investments and is the largest Arab investor in Russia, she noted.

ALSO READ: ‘UAE rebuilding bridges for regional, global stability’

Categories
-Top News Columns World News

UKRAINE: Cold War 2.0 Begins

For the region and beyond Ukraine war puts leaders before tough choices. A maverick Russian President Vladimir Putin had sent numerous signals that the Kremlin will not tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. That would put Western troops right on the Russian borders. The West had failed to provide the guarantees that Putin had asked for. And, without siding with one power against the other, we now find ourselves embroiled in a global crisis the kind of which we had not seen since the Cuban missile crisis of the 1960s …. Writes Osama Al Sharif

This is not World War Three, but it is the closest the world has gotten to since the dramatic collapse of the Soviet Union. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been in the offing for decades as NATO moved slowly towards the east recruiting former Warsaw members and installing nuclear warheads closer to Moscow. The geopolitical game of brinkmanship has been going on since the 1990s and the blame game had continued from the time of Boris Yeltsin who pointed the finger at the West for not honouring pledges made to Mikhail Gorbachev by the US that NATO will not encroach on Russia’s vital sphere of influence.

A maverick Russian President Vladimir Putin had sent numerous signals that the Kremlin will not tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. That would put Western troops right on the Russian borders. The West had failed to provide the guarantees that Putin had asked for. And, without siding with one power against the other, we now find ourselves embroiled in a global crisis the kind of which we had not seen since the Cuban missile crisis of the 1960s. Pundits will continue to engage in endless debates over who is really the evil party in this. But for the Middle East, in particular, and beyond the region’s leaders are polarized.

The US and the EU have imposed an unprecedented regime of sanctions on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. The all-inclusive sanctions are really a brutal blockade aimed at suffocating the Russian economy. This is where some countries, close to the US, had to take a step back and reconsider their position carefully.

The UAE, a member of the Security Council, stunned its western allies by abstaining at two resolutions condemning the Russian invasion. India and China took the same position. The west was fuming. Jordan, Egypt and Israel as well took their time and issued diluted statements that did not mention Russia as the aggressor. Finally, under tremendous western pressure, the UAE, Jordan, Israel and Egypt voted for a General Assembly resolution that condemned the Russian invasion of Ukraine. India and even Iran abstained.

Qatar and the UAE refused to terminate their billion dollar investments in Russia—for now. The pressure will build up. India is coming under attack from American officials for failing to take sides.

While the Americans have less to lose—every country in the world will be affected by the western sanctions—the Europeans will be hard hit by the penalties. The Russian economy is already suffering. There is no way that energy markets will go back to normality any time soon. And that means that GCC countries will grapple with its effects as well. India, Pakistan and South Asian countries—all dependent on foreign supplies of oil and gas—will struggle as well. This open-ended crisis has already polarized the world.

Call it a Cold War 2.0 or the resetting of a new world order by other means, this showdown is not to the liking of regional leaders who have been focused on building new economic and political alliances in a fast-changing region. Pakistan wants Russian gas and India’s fast growing economy is becoming energy dependent.

And the geopolitics of the region is changing too. Israel is now an ally of at least two Gulf countries, while Moscow has two vital bases in Syria. The US is not shy of admitting that it is fed up with the Middle East and is now pivoting to the South East; much to Beijing’s anxiety.

And when it comes to economic giant China, it is not interested in warfare as much as slowly building vital global financial and economic networks through its Road and Belt initiative. As much as it now stands reluctantly with Russia it will not go as far as challenging the west and suffer economic penalties itself. But it knows that the US is watching every step it takes because in reality while Russia has issues with inter-European national security; one that it must eventually resolve, its own global agenda is completely different.

These facts are not hidden from the region’s leaders. India has built a close relationship with the US, especially under Donald Trump, but it has no interest in taking sides in what is really a geopolitical European crisis that could have been resolved diplomatically many years ago.

Along the same lines, Israel knows that antagonizing the Kremlin could have immediate effects over its ability to violate Syrian skies to hit Iran backed militias without Russian intervention on an almost daily basis. An injured Russia could still play havoc with regional security.

What is certain now is that Russia will at some point march into Kiyv and install a puppet regime. Then a long standoff will prevail with the Ukraine borders presenting themselves as a New Berlin Wall.

There is something else that irks the region’s leaders and that is the double standards and hypocrisy that dominates the west’s positions. The Russian invasion conjures up memories of the US-British illegal invasion of Iraq, NATO’s unilateral intervention in Libya and other examples where international law was trampled on.

The end game is open to all scenarios: A new alliance of countries that may shun the dollar and adopt a new crypto-currency to evade sanctions or even a new block of countries that are happy to do business with each other outside the western financial network. In all cases the war in Ukraine will change the world we have known since the 1990s and the region’s leaders are coming to grips with this new reality.

(Osama Al Sharif is a journalist and commentator based in Amman)

READ MORE: The Gulf and India: A robust partnership in the making

READ MORE: Politics of brinkmanship in Vienna