Categories
-Top News China USA

Chinese Fentanyl fueling US’ drug problem

A Toronto-based think tank highlighted China’s role in the trade of synthetic drugs, which has led to concerns about possible involvement in the US opioid problem…reports Asian Lite News

Fentanyl, a nameless killer touted as the deadliest drug threat facing the United States, is waging an all-out assault on the most powerful country in the world.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is 50 times more potent than heroin. Just two milligrams of fentanyl, or the amount that could fit on the tip of a pencil, is considered a potentially lethal dose, according to the US government.

“In 2021, a record number of Americans – 107,622 – died from a drug poisoning or overdose. Sixty-six per cent of those deaths can be attributed to synthetic opioids such as fentanyl,” the US Justice Department said this week.

On Tuesday, the US government announced the results of an enforcement operation that spanned from May to September and resulted in significant fentanyl seizures across the United States.

As part of the One Pill Can Kill initiative, the DEA and its law enforcement partners seized more than 10.2 million fentanyl pills and approximately 980 pounds of fentanyl powder during the period of May 23 through Sept. 8, 2022.

The US Justice Department said the amount of fentanyl taken off the streets during this surge is equivalent to more than 36 million lethal doses removed from the illegal drug supply.

China and us flag. (Photo:Xinhua/IANS)

In an editorial, a Toronto-based think tank highlighted China’s role in the trade of synthetic drugs, which has led to concerns about possible involvement in the US opioid problem. “The production of illegal fentanyl, the majority of which was destined for the American drug market, was outlawed in China three years ago as a result of a vigorous diplomatic campaign by the United States. Since then, most of the illicit fentanyl production has moved from China to Mexico, where it is produced on an industrial scale utilising chemicals imported from China as precursors,” the International Forum For Rights And Security (IFFRAS) said.

The IFFRAS said the sale of precursor chemicals and the illicit funds obtained from it has supported China’s economy at a time when it has struggled to recover from the global financial crisis. However, it is unlikely that the opioid crisis is a part of some large-scale Chinese hybrid campaign against the United States.

The think tank argues that the opioid problem has also turned into a political negotiating chip for the Chinese government as tempers are once again rising over the Taiwan Strait.

“In protest of US congressional travels to Taiwan last month, China froze all counterdrug cooperation with the US, saying the consequences of undermining bilateral ties and hurting China-US counternarcotics cooperation should be entirely borne by the U.S. side,” the Canadian think tank said.

It states that China does not have many reasons to contribute to stopping the flow of pharmaceuticals to the US. At the same time, Washington needs to convince Beijing to crack down on Chinese chemical businesses.

According to IFFRAS, both US and China must find a way to cooperate on areas of shared concern, such as drug trafficking, as they are both major players in the global community.

In a bid to establish itself as an accountable member of the world community, China must stop the flow of dangerous narcotics into the United States. Meawhile, Washington needs to employ all of its military might to protect the citizens from the opioid crisis regardless of China’s cooperation. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Will China go for an invasion?

Categories
-Top News China

Will China go for an invasion?

A situation of war will also have a serious effect on the Chinese economy not only because of drastic economic sanctions from the West but also because of the collapse of Taiwanese economy that sustains the world’s semi-conductor industry, writes Baladas Ghoshal

Amidst an already frayed relationship between the United States and China, tensions are soaring over rapid developments in the Taiwan Strait since House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei early last month prompting Beijing to carry on aggressive military drills, launching of missiles and other grey zone strategies like sending unmanned drones to Taiwan-controlled islands.

As demonstration of the US’ commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific, it had sent two Navy warships on August 27 to transit through Taiwan Strait as Pentagon increases the frequency of freedom of navigation operations. While the US sending warships in the Taiwan Straits is nothing new, Cruisers were sent for the first time highlighting the critical nature of the situation in the Taiwan Strait. Then on September 2, the US announced a new 1.1 billion arms package for Taiwan boosting its defences. China warned of countermeasures.

The package includes US $665 million for contractor support to maintain and upgrade a Raytheon early warning radar system in operation since 2013 that will warn Taiwan about an incoming attack. Taiwan will also spend about US $355 to buy 60 Harpoon II missiles which can track and sink incoming vessels if China launches an assault by water. The arms also include US $85.6 million for more than 100 Sidewinder missiles, a mainstay of Western militaries for their air-to-air fire power. China accused the US of interfering in internal affairs and asked to immediately revoke the arms sales.

The announcement of US arms sales came one day after Taiwan shot down an unidentified commercial drone amid a sudden spate of mysterious incursions. At the time of the shooting down Taiwan did not name China, even though it was quite sure it came from China. Now Taiwan’s military has confirmed for the first time that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) flew drones across the median line that divides the Taiwan Strait.

A soldier looks through binoculars during combat exercises and training of the navy of the Eastern Theater Command of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in the waters around the Taiwan Island, Aug. 5, 2022. (Photo by Lin Jian/Xinhua/IANS)

The Defence Ministry said 45 PLA aircraft flew around Taiwan last Thursday, of which 25 crossed the median line, including a BT-100 unmanned aerial vehicle. It also confirmed that more drones had crossed the line on Friday and Saturday. On Monday, it said another PLA drone-identified as a BZK 007 had entered Taiwan’s south-west air defence identification zone, a rare revelation of the model and its flight route.

As the high-octane verbal war between the US and China ensues and the simultaneous Chinese intimidation of Taiwan through aggressive provocative actions continues, will the Taiwan crisis lead to an imminent invasion or an open conflict between the US and China?

Taiwan is naturally alarmed by the unprecedented Chinese military actions in the last one month and its defence ministry has presented a report to its Parliament where it maintained that Beijing has been simulating attacks on US navy ships and aiming to prevent foreign forces coming to Taiwan’s aid. According to the report, China is strengthening its combat preparedness by focusing on the first island chain running from Japan through Taiwan, the Philippines and onto Borneo enclosing China’s coastal seas and its suggests that China aims to gain strategic control of that island chain by 2035. China is now undermining Taiwan’s morale and “force negotiations with a war”, and “force a reunification on arms”.

China could use special force or agents to “decapitate” Taiwan’s command system and damage and infrastructure in an attack and capable of launching electronic attacks to disrupt communications and command systems as per the report dated September 1.

China could blockade Taiwan and cut off its energy supplies and economy, but at the same time noted that to carry on full invasion, Beijing still had transport and logistics constraints. To overcome those constraints, Beijing, however, had been drafting civilian transport ships for its annual amphibious drills to enhance logistic support for any Taiwan attack.

Looking at China’s military capabilities which outnumber Taiwan’s by many times, theoretically it is possible for Beijing to launch an attack on Taiwan. China has more troops, more missiles and more ships than Taiwan or its possible supporters, like the US or Japan could bring to a fight. Even compared to the US, China has certain advantages in the sphere of naval capabilities.

Beijing has 360 combat vessels as against America’s 300 ships. China has the most advanced merchant fleet, a large Coast Guard and a maritime militia, fishing boats unofficially aligned with the military, giving it access to hundreds of additional vessels that could be used to transport the hundreds of thousands troops that China would need for an amphibious invasion. With all those resources if China is quite determined to attack Taiwan, it possibly can and even win a victory.

But will it go for an invasion, as the price of that victory would be bloody and dangerous for both Beijing and its adversaries. Some analysts believe that an invasion of Taiwan would be more dangerous and complex than the Allied D-day landings in France in World War II.

Whither Taiwan Crisis: Will China go for an invasion?.(photo:IN)

US government documents put the number of killed, injured and missing from both sides during the almost three-month-long Normandy campaign at almost half a million as far as the troops are concerned. And the civilian casualties could be even worse considering the density of population concentration of Taipei. Even with numerical advantages, considering the logistics constraints, Beijing will think quite hard and long whether an invasion is worth the overwhelming human cost.

An invading army and occupying force requires almost three times the number of soldiers than the defenders. “With a potential defending force of 450,000 Taiwanese today, China would need over 1.2 million soldiers (out of a total active force of more than 2 million) that would have to be transported in many thousands of ships,” Howard Ullman, a former US Navy officer and Professor at the US Naval War College wrote in a February essay for the Atlantic Council.

According to his estimate, such an operation would take weeks and despite China’s maritime strength, it simply “lacks” the military capability and capacity to launch a full-scale amphibious invasion of Taiwan for the foreseeable future.

Not only a huge number of troops but they would also need massive amounts of supplies to sustain those for an effective invasion. “For Beijing to have reasonable prospects of victory, the PLA (People’s Liberation Army) would have to move thousands of tanks, artillery guns, armored personnel vehicles, and rocket launchers with the troops. Mountains of equipment and lakes of fuel would have to cross with them,” Ian Easton, a senior director at the Project 2049 Institute wrote in The Diplomat last year. For a country which has not seen a war since 1979, organising such an operation is not only difficult but almost near impossible.

Video screenshot shows warplane aerial refueling as the air force and naval aviation corps of the Eastern Theater Command of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) fly warplanes to conduct operations around the Taiwan Island, Aug. 4, 2022. The Eastern Theater Command on Thursday conducted joint combat exercises and training around the Taiwan Island on an unprecedented scale. (Xinhua/IANS)



“The thought about China invading Taiwan, that’s a massacre for the Chinese navy,” according to Phillips O’Brien, Professor of Strategic Studies at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. O’Brien argues that Taiwan has been stocking up on land-based anti-ship missiles similar to the Neptunes, used by Ukraine to sink Russian cruiser Moskva in the Black Sea in April. “Taiwan is mass producing these things and they’re small, it’s not like (China) can take them all out,” to quote O’Brien. He further points out: “What’s cheap is a surface-to-ship missile, what’s expensive is a ship.”

More importantly, an invasion of Taiwan would not be limited to a war between China and Taiwan but would automatically involve the US and Japan, as both have a stake in the security of Taiwan. China gaining control over Taiwan would not only give a huge boost to Xi Jinping’s China dream but would also provide Beijing with an access to the Pacific. It will also boost China’s impressive economy. For the US, it will be a complete loss of face. Allies will think that Washington cannot be trusted to defend them against adversaries.

Washington will suffer its heaviest geopolitical and economic defeat not just regionally but globally. For Japan it would be an existential problem and force it to adopt counter-strike capabilities, which it has started initiating, as reflected in the decisions taken at the 2+2 dialogue held recently in Tokyo between India and Japan. While the US still continues with its ambiguity regarding Taiwan – affirming a One China Policy and at the same time vowing to defend it.

President Biden has mentioned a number of times that he would defend Taiwan in case of a Chinese attack. That’s another matter that his White House staff tried to emphasise Washington’s ambiguous position of the One China Policy and support for the status quo. Notwithstanding the ambiguity, geo-political and economic reasons will compel the US to defend Taiwan in case of an invasion. So will Japan with whatever resources it can chip in. A situation of war will also have a serious effect on the Chinese economy not only because of drastic economic sanctions from the West but also because of the collapse of Taiwanese economy that sustains the world’s semi-conductor industry.

Under the circumstances, China is less likely to take resort to an invasion of Taiwan unless it is forced to do so if the latter declares independence-a red line for Beijing. Short of an invasion, China will do everything to intimidate Taiwan and further intensify its pressure to refrain it from undertaking any measures that go against the interests of Beijing.

To ensure Taipei does not cross the threshold, Beijing will also continue with its current military drills from time to time and launch missiles that will go over the Taiwanese airspace reaching Japanese territorial waterways as it happened last month. Rather than the conventional path, China will now use more of electronic and cyber warfare to disrupt Taiwanese command and control system. Taiwan will have to get used to this new normal and become extremely cautious not to provoke China that compels it to go for an invasion or other extreme measures.

China will also try its level best to change the power balance within Taiwanese politics. The 16th Presidential and Vice-Presidential elections in Taiwan are scheduled for early 2024. Incumbent President Tsai Ing-wen of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), who was reeled in 2024 is ineligible to seek a third term. DPP is considered to be a pro-independence party while the country’s main opposition party (KMT) does not seek total independence of Taiwan. Beijing will aim to see a new President which is definitely not from the DPP, but possibly from the KMT and supported by the Chinese Unification Promotion Party, or the Unionist Party.

Looking at the current situation in Taiwan, there is by and large anti-Chinese feeling within the country after the escalation of conflict following Pelosi’s visit and the uncertain security-economic situation created as a result of that. Whether China will succeed in its attempt to change the political equation within Taiwan will depend on how the crisis unfolds in the coming two years. But Beijing will no doubt continue to strive for that goal.

(The content is being carried under an arrangement with indianarrative.com)

ALSO READ: World Bank slashes China’s growth projection to 2.8%

Categories
-Top News Asia News China

Obesity may cost $10 trillion to China

It has added enormous health and economic burden on individuals, families and the nation if not tackled effectively. It could seriously hinder the sustainable development of the population and society in China…reports Asian Lite News

China has the world’s largest number of people with overweight or obesity and they are expected to cost 10 trillion US dollars a year to the country.

China is among 161 countries whose economies will be affected because of overweight conditions and obesity. According to a paper peer-reviewed and published in BMJ Global Health, the economic cost of the two is expected to rise from 2.19 per cent to 3.3 per cent of GDP in 161 countries.

These findings are from a new study conducted jointly by the World Obesity Federation and RTI International. The study analysed the current economic impact of overweight and obesity and provided the first-ever country-specific global estimate of the economic impacts of non-communicable disease (NCD), mainly due to avoidable healthcare costs of cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular disease attributable to obesity.

Overweight conditions and obesity are common lifestyle problems in China. The Chinese government is very well aware of it but has failed to take effective health measures. Beijing officially participated in the World Obesity Day activity on March 4.

A “Report on Chinese Residents Chronic Diseases and Nutrition (2020)” has made shocking revelations. The report found that more than 50 per cent of adults and 20 per cent of school-age children were overweight or obese. Obesity is associated with increased risks of many chronic diseases and premature death.

It has added enormous health and economic burden on individuals, families and the nation if not tackled effectively. It could seriously hinder the sustainable development of the population and society in China.

For many years, the WHO, the National Health Commission of China (NHC) and other institutions at home and abroad have been fighting the obesity epidemic. World’s highest-impact general medical journal, Lancet has stated that the rapid economic growth in China has been accompanied by an alarming rise in obesity.

According to the Lancet journal, the National survey data has suggested that more than half of Chinese adults are now living with overweight and obesity, with obesity rates likely to increase. Under`Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China’ the journal has pointed out lifestyle to be the real reason behind the rise in diabetic cases over the last three decades.

In three paper series on obesity in China, Lancet stated that China has experienced many drastic social and economic changes and shifts in people’s lifestyles since the 1990s, in parallel with the fast-rising prevalence of obesity. About half of adults and a fifth of children have overweight or obesity according to the Chinese criteria, making China the country with the highest number of overweight or obese people in the world.

Under Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China, the journal made certain observations in June 2021. Obesity has become a major public health issue in China. Overweight and obesity have increased rapidly in the past four decades, and the latest national prevalence estimates for 2015-19, based on Chinese criteria, were 6*8 pc for overweight and 3*6 pc for obesity in children younger than 6 years, 11*1 pc for overweight and 7*9 pc for obesity in children and adolescents aged 6-17 years, and 34*3 pc for overweight and 16*4 pc for obesity in adults (>=18 years).

Prevalence differed by sex, age group, and geographical location, but was substantial in all subpopulations. Strong evidence from prospective cohort studies has linked overweight and obesity to increased risks of major non-communicable diseases and premature mortality in Chinese populations.

The growing burden of overweight and obesity could be driven by economic developments, sociocultural norms, and policies shaping individual-level risk factors for obesity through urbanisation, urban planning and built environments, and food systems and environments.

Substantial changes in dietary patterns have occurred in China, with increased consumption of animal-source foods, refined grains, and highly processed, high-sugar, and high-fat foods, while physical activity levels in all major domains have decreased with increasing sedentary behaviours.

The effects of dietary factors and physical inactivity intersect with other individual-level risk factors such as genetic susceptibility, psychosocial factors, obesogens, and in-utero and early-life exposures.

Under the ‘Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China’, chapter, the journal made serious observations in June 2021. Assuming that observed time trends would continue in the future, Lancet projected the prevalence of and the number of people affected by overweight and obesity by 2030, and the associated medical costs.

The rising incidence of obesity and the number of people affected, as well as the related health and economic consequences, place a huge burden on China’s healthcare system. China has made many efforts to tackle obesity, including the implementation of relevant national policies and programmes.

However, these measures are inadequate for controlling the obesity epidemic. The journal quoted that China has attached great importance to public health in the last decade or so and the Healthy China 2030 national strategy initiated in 2016 provides a historic opportunity to establish comprehensive national strategies for tackling obesity.

China is well positioned to explore an effective model to overcome the obesity epidemic; however, strong commitment and leadership from central and local governments are needed, as well as an active participation of all related society sectors and individual citizens.

Another reputed International Journal of Obesity said China was in the midst of a severely alarming increase in obesity, particularly abdominal obesity. When these increases are combined with the sheer size of China’s population, they are likely witnessing an unparalleled development, at least in scope.

The findings of these journals are therefore a stark warning to the Chinese establishment that instead of creating trouble for other countries, it should look inwards and tackle the problems of overweight and obesity. (ANI)

ALSO READ: ‘Growth of China’s N-arsenal can be a threat’

Categories
-Top News China

China’s Covid-19 mismanagement creates havoc in Tibet

The world is being shown a country like China handling the outbreak in a harmonious way, but the reality apparently is far from that…reports Asian Lite News

China’s COVID mismanagement and stringent measures under its so-called ‘Zero Covid policy’ has created havoc in Tibet Plateau, while CCP maintains a tight information blockade from the information of and from Tibet.

There is an upsurge in COVID-19 cases in Tibet but China’s mishandling of the outbreak has outraged the Tibetans. Harsh lockdown conditions and repressive policies of the Beijing government have forced the locals to suffer, who are struggling to voice their concerns, reported Tibet Press.

The situation in Tibet is frightening. While Chinese censors have tried to keep ground realities hidden from international knowledge, the leaked information showed that at least three have died of coronavirus infection in Tibet so far as the authorities failed to give them timely medical care, according to reports.

The world is being shown a country like China handling the outbreak in a harmonious way, but the reality apparently is far from that. The measures being taken are too severe and not in the interest of the public at all.

China was the centre of the COVID-19 outbreak in the world, the whole suffered millions of deaths in the past 2 years. But when entire China and many parts of the world were reeling under the coronavirus crisis, Tibet remained untouched except for one case at the beginning of the pandemic. Tibet did not see a Covid-19 case for over 900 days.

While most of the world is free from coronavirus infections, many Chinese provinces are suffering from the viral disease. Now, Tibet has also come under its grip, for which people are blaming Chinese agencies, reported Tibet Press.

Tibetans blame that they did not get proper medical care or sanitation services from the Chinese authorities despite rising Covid-19 cases. Tibetans also complained of overbearing treatment by government officials, who are forcing people to go into mandatory quarantine without verifying if they are Covid-10 positive or not.

Chinese President Xi Jinping enforced similar stringent conditions in Tibet as they were in other parts of China earlier under the ‘Zero Covid’ policy.

Tibetans are taken to quarantine facilities or forced to stay inside their homes. This has caused them to lose their jobs and source of livelihood, besides mental harassment.

Amid this, China’s censorship of news and social media posts from Tibet has further raised concerns about the safety of Tibetans.

Several videos of China’s repression of Tibet have circulated on Social media showing Tibetans talking about poor quarantine facilities with harsh quarantine rules and crowded testing sites with no social distancing rules followed, reported Tibet Press.

The angered Tibetans are posting videos of mismanagement as well as the high-handedness of government agencies on social platforms. Videos show the unavailability of food and medicines, barely edible food, no potable water and unplanned lockdowns further raising concerns about the safety of Tibetans.

However, the Communist government has not taken it as a concern but is only aiming for a COVID-free region by taking measures that don’t work in favour of the ill.

The outbreak in Tibet began on August 7, 2022, and the lockdowns started happening right afterwards. The government was also in a state of shock due to the suddenness of the outbreak, according to reports.

The human rights issue in Tibet has gotten much worse over the years and the Chinese government has never backed down from strengthening its torturous hold on the Tibetans. Surveillance of the Tibetans in Tibet by the communist party has been extreme and any suspicious act is dealt with unlawful arrests, detentions and false convictions.

The conflict between Tibet and China has been a topic of debate for years, but the Tibetan freedom struggle has not received the attention or the justice that it deserves till now. (ANI)

ALSO READ: SCO renews call for inclusive govt in Afghanistan

Categories
-Top News China

What’s really going on in China ahead of key CCP meet?

Xi has been absent from the public eye since he returned to China from the SCO Summit in Uzbekistan last weekend. Observers said he is likely to be quarantining…reports Asian Lite News

Purges of senior officials and unfounded rumours of military coups in Beijing have fed into feverish speculation ahead of a key meeting of Chinas ruling party next month, when President Xi Jinping is expected to be granted an unprecedented third term.

The jailing of a clique of senior security officials for corruption, followed by days of strange and quickly dispelled rumours of Xi being under house arrest, have fuelled what one analyst called a “hothouse” environment mired in secrecy and suspicion, The Guardian reported.

Last week, a Chinese court jailed the former vice-minister of public security Sun Lijun, the former justice minister Fu Zhenghua, and former police chiefs of Shanghai, Chongqing and Shanxi on corruption charges.

Fu and the police chiefs had been accused of being part of a political clique surrounding Sun, and being disloyal to Xi.

Chinese President Xi Jinping delivers a speech at a meeting commending role models of the Beijing 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China April 8, 2022. REUTERS/Florence Lo – RC2RIT993BUJ

Xi is expected to be re-appointed as leader of the party and military commission at the meeting, after he abolished the two-term limit in 2018 and waged a years-long anti-corruption campaign that also targeted many political opponents.

On Sunday, the state media announced the list of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) central committee delegates, numbering almost 2,300, had been finalised.

Xi’s inclusion on the list further refuted social media rumours that had been swirling since September 24 of a military coup.

The unfounded claims, accompanied by unsourced videos of military vehicles and based mostly on mass flight cancellations, were debunked, but not before it began trending on Twitter, The Guardian reported.

There was no specific mention of the coup rumours on China’s social media, but a Weibo hashtag related to “airports across the country cancel flights” was viewed by more than 200,000 people over the weekend.

CCP at 100 (Source twitter@ChinaAmbUN) (5)

Some made fun of the rumours, noting the lack of evidence of a political takeover on the ground in Beijing, The Guardian reported.

Drew Thompson, a scholar with the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, said a coup in China wasn’t entirely implausible, and Xi had reportedly shown concern about the prospect in the past, but the weekend’s rumours looked more like “wishful thinking”.

They appeared to originate in accounts associated with the Falun Gong movement, which Thompson said was “essentially not credible”.

“The rumour that Xi Jinping has been arrested has legs because it is such a sensitive political moment in China, and the recent trials (and convictions) of long-serving senior officials creates a hothouse atmosphere,” he said on Twitter.

Other analysts like Sinocism author, Bill Bishop, said he thought the rumours were “BS” but the “inherent opacity” of the CCP mechanisms easily fuelled their spread.

The party congress is a secretive process of power distribution, with the most senior positions not announced until the final day.

Government control of the domestic narrative and crushing of dissent has intensified in recent weeks as the meeting approaches.

Xi has been absent from the public eye since he returned to China from the SCO Summit in Uzbekistan last weekend. Observers said he is likely to be quarantining, The Guardian reported.

“I think the fact this rumour spread so far, and was considered plausible enough to analyse is really a reflection of an underlying shortcoming of Chinese governance,” said Thompson.

China’s government has not responded to the rumours, but public security authorities were among those posting under the hashtag “the truth about large-scale cancellation of flights across the country”, disputing the significance of the cancellations which they said was normal for the pandemic.

The party congress begins on October 16, The Guardian reported.

The event, in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People, is closed to the public but is the most important date on the CCP’s five-year political cycle.

There is speculation that Xi could further consolidate power with the promotion of stronger allies to senior positions, and that the party will resurrect the ‘people’s leader’ title not used since Mao Zedong.

ALSO READ: China uses new tactics to change its image in Africa

Categories
-Top News Asia News China

16 Chinese military aircraft, 4 naval ships cross Taiwan Strait

The drone was a Harbin BZK-005, while the two planes were a Shaanxi Y-8 anti-submarine aircraft and a Shaanxi Y-8 reconnaissance plane..reports Asian Lite News

China’s 16 military aircraft and four ships crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait on Saturday, as per the Taiwanese Ministry of National Defense.

The Ministry of National Defense said it had tracked 16 aircraft and four ships from China’s military around the country by 5 pm on Saturday, reported Taiwan News.

“One unmanned drone and two planes entered the southwest sector of Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ),” the ministry tweeted.

The drone was a Harbin BZK-005, while the two planes were a Shaanxi Y-8 anti-submarine aircraft and a Shaanxi Y-8 reconnaissance plane, it said.

Taiwan issued radio warnings, tasked aircraft and naval vessels, and deployed land-based air defense missile systems to monitor and respond to Chinese activities, said the Taiwanese military, reported Taiwan News.

Video screenshot shows warplane aerial refueling as the air force and naval aviation corps of the Eastern Theater Command of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) fly warplanes to conduct operations around the Taiwan Island, Aug. 4, 2022. The Eastern Theater Command on Thursday conducted joint combat exercises and training around the Taiwan Island on an unprecedented scale. (Xinhua/IANS)

China’s recent incursions come as the US showed interest in helping Taiwan and approved USD 1.1 billion arms package to the self-governed nation.

The deal covered Harpoon anti-ship missiles, Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missiles, and radar equipment.

China’s embassy in Washington threatened counter-measures if the US did not revoke the latest weapons agreement, while Taiwan’s Presidential Office and Ministry of National Defence expressed gratitude for the Biden administration’s support for the country’s defence needs, reported Taiwan News.

In the recent past, China has increased its use of gray zone tactics by routinely sending aircraft into Taiwan’s ADIZ, with most occurrences taking place in the southwest corner.

In 2021, Chinese military planes entered Taiwan’s ADIZ on 961 instances over 239 days.

Gray zone tactics are defined as “an effort or series of efforts beyond steady-state deterrence and assurance that attempts to achieve one’s security objectives without resort to direct and sizable use of force.”

Taiwan has faced the threat of invasion ever since the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949, when Chiang Kai-shek’s defeated Nationalists fled there to set up a new government, having been chased out of the mainland by Mao Zedong’s Communist Party.

More than 70 years later, the Communist Party continues to view Taiwan as something akin to a breakaway province that must be “reunified” with the mainland at all costs — and it has made clear it is prepared to use force, if necessary, to fulfill that objective.

If China were to invade, the Kinmen islands — most of which have been controlled by Taiwan since the end of the war — would make a tempting first target. Lying just a few miles from the mainland Chinese city of Xiamen — and hundreds of miles from Taiwan’s capital Taipei — they are acutely vulnerable, reported CNN.

For Taiwan, the problem is that the nature of that invading force is changing. The Kinmen islands’ proximity to the mainland puts them well within the range of commercially available drones, which are cheap and plentiful in China, home to the world’s second-largest market for the machines and no shortage of potential operators among its population of 1.4 billion. 

ALSO READ: China’s ‘New Great Game’ in Afghanistan

Categories
-Top News Asia News China

China uses new tactics to change its image in Africa

Financial experts have asserted that the BRI has become a big contributor to the debt distress in Africa and the rest of the world…reports Asian Lite News

After eyebrows were raised on China’s debt trap policy under its Belt Road Initiative (BRI), it announced a loan waiver for African countries to change the narrative, however, the amount of these loans was not even 1 per cent of its total lending to the continent, forcing the poor countries to continue to suffer.

The recent cancellation of 23 loans to 17 African countries is not complete cancellation of these loans but just a waiver of the outstanding balance. So these loans are likely to be those that were nearing their end, which means the African countries would continue to suffer under China’s poor debt trap policy.

The Chinese government with its debt trap policy has offered loans to various African countries with higher interest rates that continue to add to the economic woes of the poor African countries.

China has recently emerged as a major lender in more than 32 African countries including Angola ($21.5 billion in 2017), Ethiopia ($13.7 billion), Kenya ($9.8 billion), Republic of Congo ($7.42 billion), Cameroon ($5.57 billion) and Zambia reaching $11.2 billion in 2019.

Financial experts have asserted that the BRI has become a big contributor to the debt distress in Africa and the rest of the world.

Over the last few years, China has extended a total of 1,188 loans to various African countries, which amount to a total sum of USD159.9 billion in loans, according to data compiled by the Global Development Policy Center of the Boston University.

Of the loans, a majority of loans have been extended for transportation and power generation projects, as has been the pattern of Chinese investment elsewhere.

However, as many as 27 of these loans, that amount to USD 3.5 billion have been extended toward defence-related projects. Of these, 13 loans have been provided to the country of Zambia alone, which has received a total loan amounting to USD 2.1 billion exclusively for defence purchases.

Ghana, Cameroon, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Sierra Leone and Namibia are other recipients of Chinese defence-related loans.

China’s debt trap policy BRI is often criticised which China is alleged to be using to take control of vital installations in other countries and expand its military presence,the European Times reported.

The economic crisis in Sri Lanka and the deteriorating financial situation in Pakistan has been linked to the stringent conditions of BRI loan repayment.

Think tank Centre for Strategic and International Studies said while the BRI is crucial for development but “China’s hostile economic practices, military expansion, and coercive political and ideological tactics in Africa should not be ignored.”

A report by the US Secretary of States aid the BRI projects became unsustainable due to heavy economic and environmental costs,the European Times reported.

“Largely debt-financed, 23 China’s projects in Africa often fail to meet reasonable international standards of sustainability and transparency, and burden local economies with heavy debt and other problems,” reads the report.

The elite group of G7 countries has time and again slammed the harsh terms of financing for the BRI loans. They made frequent references to the “debt trap” that made Beijing uneasy. Moreover, they proposed an alternative to the BRI, which would be sustainable and transparent.

This and what is happening in Sri Lanka and Pakistan caused the world to look at the BRI with suspicion. Thus, Beijing played a trick of loan cancellation in Africa, observers believed.

China has been cancelling interest-free loans for decades. Hannah Ryder, chief executive of Beijing -based Development Reimagined, said the debt forgiveness move was “the lowest hanging fruit” which helped Beijing hide the harsh repayment conditions of the other bulk BRI loans, the European Times reported.

Harry Verhoeven, senior research scholar at Columbia University, asserted that China tried to counter the debt-trap narrative by forgiving the 23 African loans. “It is not uncommon for China to do something like this [forgive interest-free loans] … now obviously it is connected to the overall debt-trap diplomacy narrative in the sense that clearly there’s a felt need on the part of China to push back,” he said.

Political economist Shahar Hameiri said Chinese loans are given in a hurry, skipping the important part of analysing debt sustainability.”Chinese lending has contributed to debt problems in a number of countries, although it is not necessarily the only or even the primary cause as in Sri Lanka,” Hameiri said, as quoted by the European Times.

Many African countries have voiced their concerns over the unsustainable BRI loans. Zambia has already cancelled its foreign loans which mainly constitute Chinese ones to stop aggravating its debt distress. This means 14 projects under the BRI are withdrawn. 

ALSO READ: SCO renews call for inclusive govt in Afghanistan

Categories
-Top News China India News

China takes aim at Quad

He said, “We should stand against the drawing ideological lines and expand the common ground to promote world peace and development.”…reports Arul Louis

China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi took aim at the Quad and other such initiatives, saying, “We should jointly oppose group politics and block confrontation.”

“Pursuing one’s own absolute security can only undermine global strategic stability,” he said on Saturday at the high-level UN General Assembly meeting.

The Quad, made up of India, the US, Japan and Australia, is committed to security in the Indo-Pacific region and cooperation on development and has been criticised by China, and India is entering into similar arrangements elsewhere also.

Wang did not name the Quad or India in making the criticism that was implied.

After a long confrontation with India that escalated in recent years, he said, “We must address differences by peaceful means and resolve disputes through dialogue and consultation.”

“We must uphold peace and oppose war,” he added. “Turbulence and war can only open pandora’s box.”

“No country is above others and no country should abuse this power to bully other sovereign countries,” Wang said.

Those principles can also apply to the Ukraine war, about which he added, “We call on all parties concerned to keep the crisis from spilling over and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of developing countries.”

Developing countries have been hit hard by the spillover effects of the invasion that have caused food shortages and resulted in high energy prices, the Chinese Foreign Minister said.

“China supports efforts conducive to the peaceful resolution of the Ukraine crisis. The pressing priority is to facilitate talks for peace,” he added.

“The fundamental solution is to address the legitimate security concerns of all parties and build a balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture,” he said, bringing up Russia’s objections to NATO expansion.

His statement did not reflect any substantial change in Beijing’s approach to Russia’s invasion even though Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has admitted that China had “questions and concerns” about the war.

Regarding the criticism from the West about China’s human rights record and its dictatorial system, Wang added, “A difference in systems should not be used as an excuse to create division. Still, as should democracy and human rights be used as tools or weapons to achieve political ends.”

He said, “We should stand against the drawing ideological lines and expand the common ground to promote world peace and development.”

Wang expressed concern over what he called protectionist trends and, by extension.

“Protectionism can only build around and decoupling a supply chain disruption will hurt everyone. We should stay true to open this and candour, inclusiveness and tear down fences and barriers that hinder the free flow of factors of production.”

On threats to cybersecurity, the Chinese Foreign Minister added, “We have launched a global initiative on data security as our contribution to formulating rules on global data security.”

With tension rising between China and Taiwan and the US, especially after US Speaker’s visit to the island along with Indian-American Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi, Wang reiterated Beijing’s hardline “One China” policy on Taiwan, warning that anyone trying to change it would be “crushed under the wheel of history”.

He said Taiwan issues were an internal matter of China and warned against anyone promoting the island’s independence.

“Chinese have never ceased our efforts to realise reunification,” he added.

ALSO READ-At UN, Jaishankar red flags China

Categories
-Top News China USA

Need for ‘peace and stability’ in Taiwan Strait: Blinken to Wang Yi

Over an hour-long meeting, Blinken emphasized that the United States is committed to maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, consistent with its longstanding one-China policy, reports Asian Lite News

Amid the tension between US and China, Secretary of State Antony Blinken met his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on Friday and stressed for preserving peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.

Blinken, who is in New York to attend the 77th sessions of UNGA, “stressed that preserving peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait is critical to regional and global security and prosperity,” State Department spokesperson Ned Price said in a statement.

Over an hour-long meeting, Blinken emphasized that the United States is committed to maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, consistent with its longstanding one-China policy.

Both leaders discussed the need to maintain open lines of communication and responsibly manage the US-PRC relationship.

“He also reiterated the United States’ condemnation of Russia’s war against Ukraine and highlighted the implications if the PRC were to provide support to Moscow’s invasion of a sovereign state. He underscored that the United States remains open to cooperating with the PRC where our interests intersect,” Ned Price said as quoted by the statement.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and a US delegation meets with a delegation lef by his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi.

Earlier also, the US had repeatedly raised their voice on China-Taiwan relations. On September 19, CBS released their interview with US President from its “60 minutes programme”, where Joe Biden said that American forces would defend Taiwan from a Chinese invasion.

Responding to a query over defending Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion, Biden said the US would defend Taiwan “if in fact there was an unprecedented attack,” according to The Washington Post.

Scott Pelley, the interviewer in the 60-minute programme pressed Biden on whether the situation would be different in the event of an attack on Taiwan.

“So unlike Ukraine, to be clear, sir, U.S. forces — U.S. men and women — would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion?” Pelley asked.

“Yes,” Biden replied.

The relations between China and US deteriorated after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan. That trip angered China’s ruling Communist Party — which views Taiwan as part of its territory, despite never having governed it — and it responded by launching unprecedented military drills around the island, sending warplanes across the Taiwan Strait and firing missiles over the main island. (ANI)

ALSO READ: Blinken ramps up criticism of Russia for war in Ukraine

Categories
-Top News China India News

EAM Jaishankar meets Chinese counterpart

The two leaders came face-to-face for a BRICS foreign ministers’ meeting which was hosted by South Africa…reports Asian Lite News

After attacking China for blocking the designation of Pakistan-based terrorists in the relevant UN sanctions committee, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar met his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi at a BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) ministerial meeting in New York.

The two leaders came face-to-face for a BRICS foreign ministers’ meeting which was hosted by South Africa.

The meeting also witnessed the presence of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. In the BRICS meeting, the ministers exchanged views on major global and regional issues on the United Nations (UN) agenda in the political, security, economic, financial and sustainable development spheres, as well as on intra-BRICS activities.

The ministers also discussed the possibilities for mutual support for their initiatives at the 77th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). They expressed support for the continued cooperation of BRICS members in areas of mutual interest, including through regular exchanges among their Permanent Missions to the UN.

Since its inception, BRICS, which added South Africa in 2011, has been united in calling for more representation of major emerging economies on the world’s stage — and against what it views as a disproportionate dominance of the Western powers. However there is the longstanding source of internal friction within BRICS remains unresolved while tensions between India and China, which in 2020 spiralled into a violent border clash. Critics say BRICS significance may be eroded when China violated two decades of agreements with India. BRICS went on life support in the Galwan Valley, not in New York.

ALSO READ: Fight against impunity critical for securing peace, justice: Jaishankar